首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pe
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pe
admin
2010-04-30
40
问题
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pennsylvania, after buying a seedy (破烂的) bar — "a real trash can, everything covered in grease and nicotine," he says —and turning it into a spiffy (整洁的) family restaurant. But one day last year DeLiberty opened his mail and learned he was being sued. A group called the American Disability Institute said DeLiberty’s pub failed to comply with the federal Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires that businesses be accessible to the handicapped.
Some of the alleged violations at the Westgate Pub were laughable: a toilet that was supposed to hang 18 inches from a wall was only 17 inches away, for instance. Others were off the mark. The suit complained that Westgate’s parking lot had no handicapped space —but DeLiberty says the lot is run by the local township. Meanwhile, be had served handicapped patrons for years, letting one customer regularly bring in his Seeing Eye dog, and never heard a complaint. Moreover, DeLibarty would have been willing to make any necessary changes if given the chance. He wasn’t. The message of the letter, he says, was clear: "We will close you down."
There was one possible way out, though. DeLiberty could settle the case for $2,100. Worried about an expensive legal battle, he bargained down to $1,600 and paid up. And that was it. "I never heard from them again," he says.
Before long, DeLiberty learned he was one of dozens of local businesses targeted this way. The founder of the American Disability Institute, who is a retired dentist, told the local newspaper that he planned to file more than 5,000 similar suits, potentially reaping millions of dollars in settlements.
"They throw fear into you," DeLiberty says. "The fear that all the blood, sweat and tears you’ve put into your business is going to go down the drain."
Welcome to one of the seediest (肮脏的) legal ruses (花招) going. In recent years, a number of profiteers have used the ADA to blindside (攻其无防备之处) thousands of small businesses nationwide. They demand four-or five-figure settlements over problems that may cost a few hundred dollars to fix. The targeted busi- nesses often receive no warning, and once the lawyers have been paid, they can disappear as fast as they came. Some say that it’s little more than a slick protection racket (非法勾当).
The scheme works because business owners are scared of litigation (诉讼). It takes deep pockets to fight back, as actor Clint Eastwood discovered when he faced an ADA suit against his inn in Carmel, California. In the end, a jury decided he didn’t owe the complainant a cent, yet Eastwood’s costly defense took close to four years.
The shameful thing is that money-hungry attorneys are corrupting a law meant to help the most vulnerable among us. The ADA was enacted in 1990 to protect America’s 50 million disabled people from job discrimination and to require efforts to make public places accessible to them. But the access part of the law is extremely complicated many would say over the top —detailing everything from countertop heights to mirror placement. Bathrooms alone may have to meet dozens of specifications. Even the most diligent person can fail to follow every role, thereby inviting shakedown (勒索) artists to ply their trade.
Just last year, the Pennsylvania law firm of Brodsky & Smith filed more than 100 ADA suits there and in New Jersey. In Florida, the Miami firm Fuller, Mallah &Associates racked up more than 700 lawsuits from 1998 to 2001. Another Florida lawyer, Robert Bogdan, helped start an outfit called Citizens Concerned About Disability Access before unleashing his own slew (许多) of lawsuits.
No business, from a mom-and-pop store to a big chain, is safe. One suit in Lake Worth, Florida, named a wheelchair store whose owners are disabled. Another targeted a strip club whose private lap-dance room was up a flight of stairs. And the list is growing, with suits springing up in at least 29 states.
The ADA-lawsuit king may be George Louie of Oakland, California, who claims to have filed 300 in one two-week period in 2002. A typical Louie settlement offer demands up to $10,000 —enough to break the back of a small business owner. According to Walter K. Olson, writing in City Journal, some of Louie’s settlements have totaled as much as $100,000.
Louie has no sympathy for the businesses he targets, saying they’ve had years to comply with ADA rules. "You know that if you go in and rob a bank you can’t claim ignorance of the law," he argues.
Bank robbery? Exactly who is robbing whom? Because the ADA’s rules can be so complex, "small businesses might not be aware of the requirements," says Mariana Nork of the 80,000-member American Association of People With Disabilities. "We advocate giving them a chance, telling them what the right thing to do is."
But for ambush-artists like Louie, fair warning might mean no profit. "I call it drive-by litigation," says Republican Congressman Mark Foley of Florida. "They’re not looking for compliance, just a financial settlement." Foley is now pushing a bill to require 90 days’ advance notice before any ADA lawsuit. They can’t crack down soon enough for DeLiberty. "This is legalized extortion (敲诈) ," he says. "These guys are just thieves with suits on."
What do we know about Mario DeLiberty from the first two paragraphs?
选项
A、DeLiberty ran a restaurant successfully but was being threatened by his competitors.
B、DeLiberty was being sued for denying the handicapped their access to his business.
C、DeLiberty offered poor services to his handicapped customers.
D、There were some quality problems for the facilities in DeLiberty’s pub.
答案
B
解析
根据文章头两段,可以确定A、C、D为错误的理解。B项有明确说明,为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8FOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthatofBritain,isheavilydependentoncertainessent
MoreandmoreyoungEuropeansremainsinglebecause______.AccordingtoParagraph3,thenewestgroupofsinglesare______.
Accordingtotheauthor,______.TheauthormentionsthatthemaximumTHRforolderadultparticipantsinsportsshouldbeless
Theoldestandsimplestmethod,then,ofdescribingdifferencesinpersonalitywasto(36)______peopleaccordingto(37)______
Thebesttitleforthepassagewouldbe______.TheJapanesestaffcomplainedtotheAmericanmanagerbecause______.
Comparedwiththeprofitsofmusicsector,thoseofmoviesaremuchsmaller.AccordingtoaFTCreport,U.S.mediacorporations
WhyhavesomeparentsofschoolchildrenbroughtthecityDepartmentofEducationandtheMayortocourt?Theparentswhowantt
Infaceoftheevolvingglobaleconomy,theauthorsuggeststhattheemphasisincareereducationbeshiftedto______.WhatZw
A、Jackvacuumedthelivingroombutnotthebathroom.B、Jackcleanedthebathroombutnotthelivingroom.C、Jackcleanedneithe
A、HowAswanDamWasBuilt.B、HowHollandSolvedItsDrainageProblem.C、TransportingwithCanalBoats.D、CanalsandTheirUses.
随机试题
关于粉煤灰水泥特性的说法,正确的有()。
A.盐酸普萘洛尔B.氯贝丁酯C.硝苯地平D.甲基多巴E.卡托普利影响肾素一血管紧张素一醛固酮系统的降压药是()。
简述权力机关监督的方式和程序。
在《关于实施(合格境内机构投资者境外证券投资管理试行办法)有关问题的通知》中,对QDII基金的净值计算及披露的说法错误的是()。
证券交易的特征主要表现为证券的流动性、收益性和风险性。
劳动合同的终止必须符合法定的条件,这些条件包括()。
____________willyoustaythere?
在史前夏商时期,以鼎、觚、爵为代表的大型青铜礼器,以璧、圭、琮、璋等为代表的精美玉器,一般应为国王、贵族或最高统治者所拥有的“重器”,可作为判断遗址性质的参考标准。一个大型遗址一旦发现有使用此类物品的迹象,那么其性质很可能与都邑有密切关系。但由于青铜器、玉
《共产党宣言》是科学社会主义第一个纲领性的文献。它的发表,标志着马克思主义诞生。《共产党宣言》被译成一二百种文字,出版1000多次。在人类文明史上有过许多传世名著,但没有哪一部能像《共产党宣言》这样牵动全世界最广大人民的心魄。2008年是纪念《共产党宣言》
给定资料1.据报道。一家名为“北京龙门尚学”的培训机构公开招生,称凡参加其委托班的学生,均有机会提前获得与北京四中国际部的直接签约机会,连中考成绩都可以免除。消息一出,舆论哗然:这样在招考、选拔、录取等环节上“占坑”,挑战社会常识的嚣啸之词,置教育公平于
最新回复
(
0
)