首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pe
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pe
admin
2010-04-30
63
问题
Mario DeLiberty had been living a small businessman’s dream. Twenty-one years ago he opened up the Westgate Pub in Havertown, Pennsylvania, after buying a seedy (破烂的) bar — "a real trash can, everything covered in grease and nicotine," he says —and turning it into a spiffy (整洁的) family restaurant. But one day last year DeLiberty opened his mail and learned he was being sued. A group called the American Disability Institute said DeLiberty’s pub failed to comply with the federal Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires that businesses be accessible to the handicapped.
Some of the alleged violations at the Westgate Pub were laughable: a toilet that was supposed to hang 18 inches from a wall was only 17 inches away, for instance. Others were off the mark. The suit complained that Westgate’s parking lot had no handicapped space —but DeLiberty says the lot is run by the local township. Meanwhile, be had served handicapped patrons for years, letting one customer regularly bring in his Seeing Eye dog, and never heard a complaint. Moreover, DeLibarty would have been willing to make any necessary changes if given the chance. He wasn’t. The message of the letter, he says, was clear: "We will close you down."
There was one possible way out, though. DeLiberty could settle the case for $2,100. Worried about an expensive legal battle, he bargained down to $1,600 and paid up. And that was it. "I never heard from them again," he says.
Before long, DeLiberty learned he was one of dozens of local businesses targeted this way. The founder of the American Disability Institute, who is a retired dentist, told the local newspaper that he planned to file more than 5,000 similar suits, potentially reaping millions of dollars in settlements.
"They throw fear into you," DeLiberty says. "The fear that all the blood, sweat and tears you’ve put into your business is going to go down the drain."
Welcome to one of the seediest (肮脏的) legal ruses (花招) going. In recent years, a number of profiteers have used the ADA to blindside (攻其无防备之处) thousands of small businesses nationwide. They demand four-or five-figure settlements over problems that may cost a few hundred dollars to fix. The targeted busi- nesses often receive no warning, and once the lawyers have been paid, they can disappear as fast as they came. Some say that it’s little more than a slick protection racket (非法勾当).
The scheme works because business owners are scared of litigation (诉讼). It takes deep pockets to fight back, as actor Clint Eastwood discovered when he faced an ADA suit against his inn in Carmel, California. In the end, a jury decided he didn’t owe the complainant a cent, yet Eastwood’s costly defense took close to four years.
The shameful thing is that money-hungry attorneys are corrupting a law meant to help the most vulnerable among us. The ADA was enacted in 1990 to protect America’s 50 million disabled people from job discrimination and to require efforts to make public places accessible to them. But the access part of the law is extremely complicated many would say over the top —detailing everything from countertop heights to mirror placement. Bathrooms alone may have to meet dozens of specifications. Even the most diligent person can fail to follow every role, thereby inviting shakedown (勒索) artists to ply their trade.
Just last year, the Pennsylvania law firm of Brodsky & Smith filed more than 100 ADA suits there and in New Jersey. In Florida, the Miami firm Fuller, Mallah &Associates racked up more than 700 lawsuits from 1998 to 2001. Another Florida lawyer, Robert Bogdan, helped start an outfit called Citizens Concerned About Disability Access before unleashing his own slew (许多) of lawsuits.
No business, from a mom-and-pop store to a big chain, is safe. One suit in Lake Worth, Florida, named a wheelchair store whose owners are disabled. Another targeted a strip club whose private lap-dance room was up a flight of stairs. And the list is growing, with suits springing up in at least 29 states.
The ADA-lawsuit king may be George Louie of Oakland, California, who claims to have filed 300 in one two-week period in 2002. A typical Louie settlement offer demands up to $10,000 —enough to break the back of a small business owner. According to Walter K. Olson, writing in City Journal, some of Louie’s settlements have totaled as much as $100,000.
Louie has no sympathy for the businesses he targets, saying they’ve had years to comply with ADA rules. "You know that if you go in and rob a bank you can’t claim ignorance of the law," he argues.
Bank robbery? Exactly who is robbing whom? Because the ADA’s rules can be so complex, "small businesses might not be aware of the requirements," says Mariana Nork of the 80,000-member American Association of People With Disabilities. "We advocate giving them a chance, telling them what the right thing to do is."
But for ambush-artists like Louie, fair warning might mean no profit. "I call it drive-by litigation," says Republican Congressman Mark Foley of Florida. "They’re not looking for compliance, just a financial settlement." Foley is now pushing a bill to require 90 days’ advance notice before any ADA lawsuit. They can’t crack down soon enough for DeLiberty. "This is legalized extortion (敲诈) ," he says. "These guys are just thieves with suits on."
What do we know about Mario DeLiberty from the first two paragraphs?
选项
A、DeLiberty ran a restaurant successfully but was being threatened by his competitors.
B、DeLiberty was being sued for denying the handicapped their access to his business.
C、DeLiberty offered poor services to his handicapped customers.
D、There were some quality problems for the facilities in DeLiberty’s pub.
答案
B
解析
根据文章头两段,可以确定A、C、D为错误的理解。B项有明确说明,为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8FOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopicABoominContinuingEducation.Youshouldwritea
A、Hehasmanypets.B、Hehasthreechildren.C、Hedoesn’tneedalargerhouse.D、Hiswifeispregnant.DWhydoesthemanneeda
Massivechangesinalloftheworld’sdeeplycherishedsportinghabitsareunderway.Whetherit’soneofLondon’sparksfullof
A、Girlsleftthevillagetofindhope.B、Menleftthevillagetoseekopportunities.C、Thelong-establishedorderofsociety.D、
A、Theyfoughtwiththeothermice.B、Theystayedclosetotheirmothers.C、Theyranbackandforthconstantly.D、Theyremainedc
A、Howanimalsreacttofrighteningsituations.B、Whymiceareparticularlyfearfulanimals.C、Whetherfearfulnessisagenetict
A、Trafficlawsandregulations.B、Drivingtheoryandpractice.C、Switchinglanesandturningcorners.D、Waystoavoidtrafficac
A、Helosteverythingincludinghiscomputer.B、Hesufferedfromaseriouscaraccident.C、Hewentabroadtojoinhisfamily.D、H
1.你是如何得知招生信息的2.自我推荐并说明选择该校的理由3.希望得到该校的回复
GriffithworkedforafirmthatspecializedineconomicdevelopmentinWashingtonD.C.becausesheneededmoneytopayforherd
随机试题
江苏省南通市某轻工产品进出口公司向外国某公司进口一批小家电产品,货物分两批装运,支付方式为不可撤销议付信用证,每批分别由中国银行某分行开立一份信用证。第一批货物装运后,卖方在有效期内向银行交单议付,议付行审单后,未发现不符点,即向该商议付货款,随后中国银行
记忆的内容,因消退原因,完全不能再认或回忆叫()
结缔组织病的特点包括
下列关于风险自留的说法,正确的有()。
下列关于目前我国对建设项目进行环境影响评价论述正确的是()。
直接筹资是企业直接与资金供应者协商筹集资金。下列各项中,属于直接筹资主要方式的有()。
的值为().
A、 B、 C、 D、 C采用intA[]={3,4,9,8}定义数组A,则A中只有4个元素,而题干要求的是7个元素,A[4]、A[5]、A[6]3个元素就不存在。
将十进制数35转换成二进制数是()。
WhyisGracecallingJohn?
最新回复
(
0
)