首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
admin
2013-02-16
56
问题
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip to middle school. On the surface, the question of computers in schools is a no-brainer. It would be strange to insist that today’s technology shouldn’t be used to make the classroom experience more individualized, more effective, more immediate, more exciting. Computers have been in schools more than 20 years — and probably even done some good.
But the idea of a personal computer as a necessary daily tool for every American grammar school pupil is altogether different thing. Beware the superficially attractive vision of 10-year-olds doing most of their work — and homework — on a computer. It’s another illusory silver bullet that promises to solve all of society’s ills through technology. Regardless of whether parents or taxpayers buy the machinery, it’s a bad policy.
Determining the proper role of computers in schools is too important to be left to computer suppliers and educators. An educated public with clear and realistic expectations needs to help determine the right track for technology.
Educators forever seem to seek the ultimate in curricular or teaching tools. They are always preoccupied with innovation — junior high school, new math, whole language, open classrooms and mastery learning, to name a few. Some ideas turned out well and over time have earned permanent positions in our education systems. Other reflected change for changes’ sake and wound up in the trash bin, where they belong.
Exactly what is to be solved with computers in schools? Are we looking to improve instructional capacity and flexibility? Are we trying to make teachers and aides more productive by letting students take advantage of programmed learning tools? This all sounds good, and much has been accomplished with computer-assisted instruction.
But that’s not the same as making the computer a symbol of well-tempered educational policy. There’s danger in the message that a child is not fully educated if he or she can’t surf the World Wide Web skillfully, move around in Windows or the Founder, use a word processing program, or program in Logo or Basic.
These skills can be learned outside the classroom. Worse, the time it takes students to acquire them is time stolen from the legitimate teaching schedule — and that’s a bad trade.
And what kind of computers should be purchased? We’re not talking brand names. Most school systems don’t have the money to replace PCs or Macs on the two-to-three-year cycle that shifts technologies demand. On the other hand, $2, 500 — the cost of just one computer — invested in books for the school library produces an asset that has, shall we say, a longer shelf life.
And who changes the factory culture of schoolrooms to allow computers to be more effective? And who teaches the teachers? These are the really tough issues — the ones that more hardware won’t solve.
Children are best served when schools contribute to shaping the solid foundations on which their future will be built. The student who can read with curiosity and understanding, who has mastered basic mathematical concepts, who can evaluate ideas critically, is the one schools should aim to produce.
According to the author, teaching computer in the school classroom is bad practice because______.
选项
A、the computer is too expensive a luxury for school pupils
B、the pupils are not intelligently mature enough to master the skills
C、it takes too much time which might have been spent on regular courses
D、the pupils can learn nothing from computer-assisted instruction
答案
C
解析
根据文章第七段“These skills can be learned outside the classroom.Worse,the time it takes studentsto acquire them is time stolen from the legitimate teaching schedule—and that’s a bad trade.”可知,这些技能可以在课堂之外学习。更糟糕的是,学生学习这些技能实际上是在偷窃法定教学时间——这真不划算。据此判断,答案是C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8UmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Childrenare(among)themostfrequentvictimsofviolent,(drug-related)crimes(that)havenothing(doingwith)thecostofac
随机试题
慢性细菌性结膜炎发病原因包括()
血清阴性脊柱关节炎不包括下列哪项疾病
50岁女性,右耳垂下无痛性肿物缓慢长大4年,局部有胀感。检查见肿块位于腮腺后下极,表面光滑,质中偏软,不可压缩,与皮肤无粘连。最可能的诊断是
该公司的综合资金成本为()。该公司投资项目的现值指数为()。(计算结果保留4位小数)
一旦商业银行采用了(),未经监管当局批准不可退回使用相对简单的方法。
政府预算的内容及其执行情况应置于()的监督之下。
下列结束角色游戏的方式不适当的是()。
1,2,2,4,16,()
在金本位货币制度下,设1英镑铸币的含金量为7.32238克纯金,1美元铸币的含金量为1.50463克纯金,在英国和美国之间运送1英镑的费用及其他费用约为0.03美元,试计算:(1)英镑和美元的铸币平价;(2)美国的黄金输入点和黄金输
Beforethedisastrousearthquaketherewas______chaos.
最新回复
(
0
)