首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
admin
2013-02-16
84
问题
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip to middle school. On the surface, the question of computers in schools is a no-brainer. It would be strange to insist that today’s technology shouldn’t be used to make the classroom experience more individualized, more effective, more immediate, more exciting. Computers have been in schools more than 20 years — and probably even done some good.
But the idea of a personal computer as a necessary daily tool for every American grammar school pupil is altogether different thing. Beware the superficially attractive vision of 10-year-olds doing most of their work — and homework — on a computer. It’s another illusory silver bullet that promises to solve all of society’s ills through technology. Regardless of whether parents or taxpayers buy the machinery, it’s a bad policy.
Determining the proper role of computers in schools is too important to be left to computer suppliers and educators. An educated public with clear and realistic expectations needs to help determine the right track for technology.
Educators forever seem to seek the ultimate in curricular or teaching tools. They are always preoccupied with innovation — junior high school, new math, whole language, open classrooms and mastery learning, to name a few. Some ideas turned out well and over time have earned permanent positions in our education systems. Other reflected change for changes’ sake and wound up in the trash bin, where they belong.
Exactly what is to be solved with computers in schools? Are we looking to improve instructional capacity and flexibility? Are we trying to make teachers and aides more productive by letting students take advantage of programmed learning tools? This all sounds good, and much has been accomplished with computer-assisted instruction.
But that’s not the same as making the computer a symbol of well-tempered educational policy. There’s danger in the message that a child is not fully educated if he or she can’t surf the World Wide Web skillfully, move around in Windows or the Founder, use a word processing program, or program in Logo or Basic.
These skills can be learned outside the classroom. Worse, the time it takes students to acquire them is time stolen from the legitimate teaching schedule — and that’s a bad trade.
And what kind of computers should be purchased? We’re not talking brand names. Most school systems don’t have the money to replace PCs or Macs on the two-to-three-year cycle that shifts technologies demand. On the other hand, $2, 500 — the cost of just one computer — invested in books for the school library produces an asset that has, shall we say, a longer shelf life.
And who changes the factory culture of schoolrooms to allow computers to be more effective? And who teaches the teachers? These are the really tough issues — the ones that more hardware won’t solve.
Children are best served when schools contribute to shaping the solid foundations on which their future will be built. The student who can read with curiosity and understanding, who has mastered basic mathematical concepts, who can evaluate ideas critically, is the one schools should aim to produce.
According to the author, teaching computer in the school classroom is bad practice because______.
选项
A、the computer is too expensive a luxury for school pupils
B、the pupils are not intelligently mature enough to master the skills
C、it takes too much time which might have been spent on regular courses
D、the pupils can learn nothing from computer-assisted instruction
答案
C
解析
根据文章第七段“These skills can be learned outside the classroom.Worse,the time it takes studentsto acquire them is time stolen from the legitimate teaching schedule—and that’s a bad trade.”可知,这些技能可以在课堂之外学习。更糟糕的是,学生学习这些技能实际上是在偷窃法定教学时间——这真不划算。据此判断,答案是C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8UmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
随机试题
提出"气滞"可以生痰饮的医家是
维持机体体液平衡的主要器官是
肝功能不全者应慎用的中药是()。
对于较硬土质,其钻进取样宜采用()。
通常情况下,资产负债表各项目的12月末余额就是当年的年末余额,因而,年度资产负债表往往和当年12月份的资产负债表相同。()
下列关于社会审计人员对委托单位责任的表述,错误的是()。
下列关于合伙企业成立时间的表述中,符合合伙企业法律制度规定的是( )。
甲公司2×15年至2×20年发生以下交易或事项:2×15年12月31日购入一栋管理用办公楼,实际取得成本为6000万元。该办公楼预计使用年限为20年,预计净残值为零,采用年限平均法计提折旧。因公司迁址,2×18年6月30日甲公司与乙公司签订租赁协议。该协
Yesterdaymorningtherewereonlythreeboysinourroom,______.
类型电影
最新回复
(
0
)