首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-12-01
44
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a. recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U. S. -born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised nitive wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
The author is most probably______.
选项
A、a scientist
B、an economist
C、a politician
D、a sociologist
答案
D
解析
该题为推断题,文中多次提到“经济学家告诉我们”以及“政客们”如何如何,可见作者不属于他们中的任一种,此外,该文章也不是科技文,所以作者最有可能是探讨社会问题的社会学家。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8maO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
DavidLandes,authorofTheWealthandPovertyofNations:WhySomeAreSoRichandSomeSoPoor,creditstheworld’seconomics
TessoftheDurbervilleswaswrittenby______.
Nicepeopledoracismtoo.Liberalcommitmenttoamulti-ethnicBritainiswilting.Someverynicefolkhaveapparentlydecided
ThePilgrim’sProgressiswrittenby
WeknowthathewasbaptizedonApril26,1564,sothatsomewherebetweenApril20andApril23,fourhundredyearsago,wasbor
A、Malaysia’sPrimeMinisterB、Malaysia’sMinisterofCultureC、thespeakerofaStateAssemblyD、thespokesmanofthePrimeMini
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingadegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscan-ygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourown
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourow
要一个人独自进食,即使不算重罚,在中国文化中通常也被视为不幸,一种不无悲凉的境地。汉语对吃独食的描述,大都乏善可陈,一句“胡乱吃了些”搪塞过去。中国人的社会中,人必须借饮食与他人沟通,与社会上的人形成生命共同体之感受。如今,大家庭在解体,晚婚、单
随机试题
患者,女,44岁,患风湿性心脏瓣膜病多年。症见心悸气短,神疲乏力,咳嗽喘促,颧颊暗红,唇甲青紫,舌有瘀斑,脉细结代。其治法是
下列哪项护理诊断不妥
封闭式基金一般采用()方式分红。
职业道德对职业技能所具有的作用()。
有些日本人认为不应该纠缠于中日间过去的鸡毛蒜皮的陈年旧账,要放眼中日友好的巨大利益,他们中一些“杰出的”代表还根据欧洲经济共同体的模式提出了一个中日关系新思维理论。这个所谓的新思维认为,如果早在20世纪就建立起日本人设计的“大东亚共荣圈”,将会给亚洲人民带
推动:阻碍
内部控制是指经济单位和各个组织在经济活动中建立的一种相互制约的业务组织形式和职责分工制度,其通过在单位内部采取的自我调整、约束、规划、评价和控制的一系列方法来实现经营目标,从而保护资产的安全完整,保证会计信息资料的正确可靠,确保经营方针的贯彻执行,保证经营
一棵深度为k的平衡二叉树,其每个非叶子结点的平衡因子均为0,则该树的结点数是()。
[*]
A、Thepsychictearsrequireanemotionalresponse,ortriggertobeactivated.B、Onlygreatpainorlossoflovemakesuscry.C
最新回复
(
0
)