首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2013-11-29
44
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990.What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures—5.2 million now, 5.5 million then—are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and. moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups—"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background" — and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
Rabbis and moralists consider the Jewish population decline as the result of ______.
选项
A、Jewish negligence of their religious belief
B、Jewish incompetence in America
C、Jewish self-esteem
D、the combination of all the three above
答案
A
解析
答案在第三段:rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9yZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoOxfordEnglishDictionary,bookis"awrittenorprintedtreatiseorseriesoftreatises,occupyingseveralsheets
TheAustralianpopulationisstillmainlyof______descendant.
AccordingtoSaussure,therelationbetweenbookandtheothersinthesentence"Iboughtanewbooktoday"is
Thereare______establishedchurchesintheUK.
Bynow,itshouldcomeasnosurprisewhenscientistsdiscoveryetanothercaseofexperiencechangingthebrain.Fromthesenso
Bynow,itshouldcomeasnosurprisewhenscientistsdiscoveryetanothercaseofexperiencechangingthebrain.Fromthesenso
Anystudentsettingoutonacademiccareerinscienceislikelytobecomeincreasinglyseparatedfromhumanitiesandsociety.Ev
Itiscommonforstudentsinhighschooltowonderifcollegeeducationisreallyimportant.Manyhighschoolstudentsdon’ten
ThefirstrealorganizedefforttounitingEuropecame(1)______withthecreationoftheCouncilofEurope,wasestablished(2)
Pen-palLetters:TheCross-curricularExperienceIaskedmycousin,ateacherinTucson,Arizona,tohaveourclassesbecome
随机试题
财政部采取组织同行评议,向用户企业征求意见等方式对软件供应商提供的会计软件遵循《企业会计信息化工作规范》的情况进行检查。省、自治区、直辖市人民政府财政部门发现会计软件不符合《企业会计信息化工作规范》的,应当将有关情况报财政部。()
在Excel2010中,根据数据表制作图表时,可以对()进行设置。
某孕妇HBeAg(+),对新生儿最好应注射
属糖皮质激素类药的药物是
最优化原则包括的内容,下列哪项正确
某项目现有三个互斥的投资方案A、B、C,欲从中选择最有利的方案,三个投资方案的投资额及一年后的净收益如下表所示。各方案的寿命期都是一年,一年后的净残值为零。假设基准收益率为6%。根据题意,回答下列问题:【2008年真题】在下列指标中,可用于对A
下列说法错误的是()。
校学术委员会开会讨论新一轮的重点学科建设规划。王教授主张:既要重点建设教育科学,也要建设自然地理学;赵教授提出:只有重点建设计算机信息工程,才能建设自然地理学;李教授认为:如果要重点建设教育科学和自然地理学,那么也要建设计算机信息工程。经过充分讨论,在上述
下列哪个方法和resume()方法相互搭配,使线程停止执行,然后调用resume()方法恢复线程?()
Anyonewhois_________withtheseworkswillimmediatelyrecognizeinthepoemcertainreferencestovegetationceremonies.
最新回复
(
0
)