2. 考研
  3. The report from the Bureau of Labour Statistics was just as gloomy as anticipated. Unemployment in January jumped to a 16-year h

The report from the Bureau of Labour Statistics was just as gloomy as anticipated. Unemployment in January jumped to a 16-year h

admin2019-06-20  6
问题    The report from the Bureau of Labour Statistics was just as gloomy as anticipated. Unemployment in January jumped to a 16-year high of 7. 6 percent, as 598 ,000 jobs were slashed from US payrolls in the worst single-month decline since December, 1974. With 1. 8 million jobs lost in the last three months, there is urgent desire to boost the economy as quickly as possible. But Washington would do well to take a deep breath before reacting to the grim numbers.
   Collectively, we rely on the unemployment figures and other statistics to frame our sense of reality. They are a vital part of an array of data that we use to assess if we’re doing well or doing badly, and that in turn shapes government policies and corporate budgets and personal spending decisions. The problem is that the statistics aren’t an objective measure of reality; they are simply a best approximation. Directionally, they capture the trends, but the idea that we know precisely how many are unemployed is a myth. That makes finding a solution all the more difficult.
   First, there is the way the data is assembled. The official unemployment rate is the product of a telephone survey of about 60,000 homes. There is another survey, sometimes referred to as the "payroll survey" that assesses 400,000 businesses based on their reported payrolls. Both surveys have problems. The payroll survey can easily double-count someone: if you are one person with two jobs, you show up as two workers. The payroll survey also doesn’t capture the number of self-employed, and so says little about how many people are generating an independent income.
   The household survey has a larger problem. When asked straightforwardly, people tend to lie or shade the truth when the subject is sex, money or employment. If you get a call and are asked if you’re employed, and you say yes, you’re employed. If you say no, however, it may surprise you to learn that you are only unemployed if you’ve been actively looking for work in the past four weeks; otherwise, you are " marginally attached to the labour force" and not actually unemployed.
   The urge to quantify is embedded in our society. But the idea that statisticians can then capture an objective reality isn’t just impossible. It also leads to serious misjudgments. Democrats and Republicans can and will take sides on a number of issues, but a more crucial concern is that both are basing major policy decisions on guesstimates rather than looking at the vast wealth of raw data with a critical eye and an open mind.
What do we learn from the first paragraph?
选项 A、The US economic situation is going from bad to worse.
B、Washington is taking drastic measures to provide more jobs.
C、The US government is slashing more jobs from its payrolls.
D、The recent economic crisis has taken the US by surprise.
答案A
解析 事实细节题。第一段第一句指出，美国劳工统计局的报告如预期的一样悲观，其后给出了失业方面的若干数据，说明就业情况一直在恶化；第三句提到，迫切期望刺激经济发展。由此可知，经济状况越来越差，[A]项表述符合文义，故为答案。第一段最后一句提到，美国政府认为采取措施前应深思熟虑，即表明美国政府没有立即采取行动，故排除[B]项；该段第二句表明，失业率创新高，导致的就业人数的大幅下降，因此，工作岗位减少不是政府的主动行为，[C]项表述与原文不符，故排除；[D]项所述与第一段第一句不符，故也排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ACra777K
本试题收录于： 翻译硕士（翻译硕士英语）题库专业硕士分类
0

翻译硕士（翻译硕士英语）

专业硕士

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)