2. 外语
  3. The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted, objectively selected facts. But in these days of comp

The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted, objectively selected facts. But in these days of comp

admin2011-02-11  36
问题   The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted, objectively selected facts. But in these days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment confronting American journalism -- to make clear to the reader the problems of the day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to recognize that there is no longer any such thing (with the possible exception of such scribbling as society and club news) as "local" news, because any event in the international area has a local reaction in manpower draft, in economic strain, in terms, indeed, of our very way of life.
  There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering choppy and dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense.
  The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine themselves to the "facts". This insistence raises two questions: what are the facts? And: are the bare facts enough?
As to the first query, consider how a so-called "factual" story comes about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space allotment being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten, which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece. This is important decision because many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph. This is Judgment Number Two. Then the night editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has a large impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little. Judgment Number Three.
  Thus, in the presentation of a so-called "factual" or "objective" story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved in interpretation, in which reporter and editor, calling upon their general background, and their "news neutralism", arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news.
  The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, axe both objective rather than subjective processes -- as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Note in passing: even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be the beacon on the murky news channels.) If an editor is intent on slanting the news, he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up his particular plea. Or he can do it by the pay he gives a story -- promoting it to page one or demoting it to page thirty.  
In what way are presentation and interpretation of news alike?
选项 A、They are both subjective.
B、They are both difficult to do.
C、They both involve judgments by reporters and editors.
D、They both help keep the objectivity of news.
答案C
解析 推断题。第四段提到，在进行新闻报道时，记者或者编辑根据新闻的重要性做出判断和选择；第五段指出，这些判断和解释新闻时进行的判断在本质上是相同的，由此推断，新闻报道和新闻解释的相似之处在于两者都需要记者和编辑进行判断，所以C正确。A与原文直接相反，因为文章最后一段说它们两者都是客观的，而非主观的；B、D原文并未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/AaeO777K
0

专业英语八级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)