首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in hi
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in hi
admin
2013-04-25
77
问题
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars
The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in history. Reading this book, one gets the sense that day is coming, major automakers—still no paragons of environmentalism—have gotten the message that replacing the dirty internal-combustion engine is an urgent priority. With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, Americans produce 14 percent of all global warming carbon-dioxide gas. And car tailpipes pump out more than 30 percent of U. S. air pollution.
In his new book, Forward Drive: The Race to Build "Clean" Cars for the Future, environmentalist Jim Motavalli concludes that capitalist competition is leading the way over government mandates to clean up that exhaust. Motavalli chronicles the movement for cleaner cars: the few visionaries and zealots building and driving home-built battery-powered cars; the divided giant automakers working tirelessly to develop clean cars while fighting regulatory efforts to require them; university researchers concluding studies; and the regulators trying to speed their adoption.
Forward Drive covers the technological advances of the hybrid and fuel-cell vehicles poised to take over from the internal-combustion engine. In some ways, Motavalli is an unlikely narrator. A self-vowed car nut who stumbled into a job editing E, the Enviromental Magazine, he seems biased on both sides of the issue. But ultimately, that’s what makes him best suited to tell this story.
Motoavalli’s concern for the environment is sincere, and his knowledge of cars is refreshingly accurate. The most interesting passages follow his transformattion from internal-combustion devotee to environmental auto cynic and battery-car zealot to hopeful future-car realist. "It was disconcerting, to say the least, to learn that my hobby of collecting classic cars and my growing concern for the environment didn’t necessarily mesh," Motavalli writes. "The car has certainly been good to me, but I’m becomin disenchanted."
In the preface, he noted that he set out to write a book critical of the auto industry for teaming up with major oil companies to block the development of clean cars. But when he dug in to do more research, he found a different story. Namely that automakers in Detroit, Japan, and Europe are in a heated race to start selling cars that are more environmentally correct.
(A)Unfortunately, Motavalli glosses over issues of consumer demand.
(B)He never mentions that today’s electric cars and gasoline-electric hybrids cost far more than internal-combustion cars of equal or greater capability.
(C)He notes their utter dedication to their electric cars and implies that the rest of the buying public should simply be as enthusiastic, without addressing issues of price or various ways families use their cars.
(D)
He strongly favors California’s mandate that 10 percent of all vehicles sold in the state be zero-emission-vehicle-battery or fuel-cell electrics, not hybrids—even though he writes, "Ultimately, vehicles halfheartedly designed to meet a mandate would fail in the marketplace." And he gives a short shift to the point that clean cars do nothing to ease congestion and sprawl.
In a telephone interview, Motavalli concedes that technology is progressing faster than the book deadline allowed him to keep up with. If anything, automakers are working harder to develop hybrid-electrics. And mass-market hybrid-drive systems will likely first show up in the big sport utility vehicles that Motavalli rails against.
Nevertheless, he now believes that the automakers with the deepest pockets have the best chance of building better cars for tomorrow. "The new, clean cars will emerge not from a tinkerer’s garage, but from the well-funded research labs of the same big auto companies that initially fought their introduction," he says.
According to Paragraph 7, what does the author mean by saying "he gives a short shift to the point"?
选项
A、He gives detailed illustration of the point.
B、He pays little attention to the point.
C、He writes a short paragraph about the point.
D、He ends with a brief but warm discussion about the point.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:根据第七段,作者说“he gives a short shift to the point”是什么意思?从文中可知他前面一直在讨论车辆方面的问题,在最后提到清洁汽车并不能缓解汽车拥堵和行走缓慢的问题,所以作者那句话的意思是C项(他只用了一段的篇幅来写这一点)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/AvyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Whatkindofcourseisthemanseeking?Whatproficiencylevelisthestudent?
SECTION1Questions1-10Questions1-4CirclethecorrectlettersA-C.
Whatwasthestudentsurprisedtodiscoverhehadalotof?Theprofessorpointsoutthattheuniversitylanguagecentre______
Thingsthatseemexcitingandfascinatingcanlaterseem______accordingtoAliandJatinder.Katarinadecidestoregisterat
Thingsthatseemexcitingandfascinatingcanlaterseem______accordingtoAliandJatinder.WhatschemedoesJatindertalka
Whichcolumnofthebarchartrepresentsthefiguresquoted?Accordingtothespeaker,themaincauseofbackpaininwomeni
TheprofessoralreadyknowssomethingaboutClarefromher______.
Thelecturersaysthatanessayislike______toaspecificquestion.【36】
A、Hishousematedoesn’twantthewindowsdosedB、HishousemateisresponsibleforpayingtheelectricbillC、Thewindowsarehar
GreenPowerYou’veinsulatedtheattic,installedtriple-glazedwindows,andboughthigh-efficiencyappliances.Canyoumake
随机试题
对药品分别按处方药与非处方药进行管理是根据药品的
下列选项中哪一个不属于行政诉讼的法定证据?()
某甲在乘坐某乙的出租车时,将公文包遗忘在出租车内,包内有现金5万元,某乙将该公文包予以藏匿。几天后,甲找到乙所在的出租车公司,将乙辨认出来,乙虽然很不情愿,但也只好交出公文包。关于乙的行为下列哪项是正确的?()
被告人刘某因与丈夫金某不和离家出走。一天其女(时龄12周岁)前来刘某住处,刘某指使其女用家中的鼠药毒杀金某。其女回家后,即将鼠药拌入金某的饭中,金某食用后中毒死亡。其女没有达到刑事责任年龄。被告人刘某的行为,定罪处罚正确的是:()。
对机器设备进行裂纹检测,可采用()。
属于以生产资料公有制为基础的生产关系是()。
在黄土高原的生态建设中,不可取的做法是()。
【2015年重庆双特.多选】人的能力存在着差异,主要表现在()。
某地规定,居民申请一套公租房,需要提供7个证件,还要经过“三审三公示”程序,前后至少等待90天。面对如此繁琐耗时的行政审批流程,许多公租房的需求者望而却步,导致该地不少公租房空置。对此,当地相关部门解释:“之所以要求提供这么多证件,是为了分配的公平公正;之
甲(10周岁)、乙(11周岁)、丙(12周岁)翻越高速公路天桥旁水泥护栏后,趴在防护网上往高速公路抛掷石块击打过往车辆,其中一石块击中司机丁致其重伤,但无法确认该石块是谁投掷。丁的损害应由()(2018年基础课非法学单选第31题)
最新回复
(
0
)