首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
admin
2016-12-18
73
问题
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest?
[A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will embrace the new and uncompromisingly follow the logic of prices and profit, a revolutionary accelerator for necessary change. But it can only ever react to today’s prices, which cannot capture what will happen tomorrow. So, left to itself, capitalism will neglect both the future and the cohesion of the society in which it trades.
[B]What we know, especially after the financial crisis of 2008, is that we can’t leave capitalism to itself. If we want it to work at its best, combining its doctrines with public and social objectives, there is no alternative but to design the markets in which it operates. We also need to try to add in wider obligations than the simple pursuit of economic logic. Otherwise, there lies disaster.
[C]If this is now obvious in banking, it has just become so in energy. Since 2004, consumers’ energy bills have nearly tripled, far more than the rise in energy prices. The energy companies demand returns nearly double those in mass retailing. This would be problematic at any time, but when wages in real terms have fallen by some 10% in five years it constitutes a crisis. John Major, pointing to the mass of citizens who now face a choice between eating or being warm—as he made the case for a high profits tax on energy companies—drove home the social reality. The energy market, as it currently operates, is maladaptive and illegitimate. There has to be changed.
[D]The design of this market is now universally recognised as wrong, universally, that is, excepting the regulator and the government. The energy companies are able to disguise their cost structures because there is no general pool into which they are required to sell their energy—instead opaquely striking complex internal deals between their generating and supply arms. Yet this is an industry where production and consumption is 24/7 and whose production logic requires such energy pooling. The sector has informally agreed, without regulatory challenge, that it should seek a supply margin of 5%—twice that of retailing.
[E]On top the industry also requires long-term price guarantees for investment in renewables and nuclear without any comparable return in lowering its target cost of capital. The national grid, similarly privately owned, balances its profit maximising aims with a need to ensure security of supply. And every commitment to decarbonise British energy supply by 2030 is passed on to the consumer, rich and poor alike, whatever their capacity to pay. It will also lead to negligible new investment unless backed by government guarantees and subsidies. It could scarcely be worse—and with so much energy capacity closing in the next two years constitutes a first-order national crisis.
[F]The general direction of reform is clear. Energy companies should be required to sell their electricity into a pool whose price would become the base price for retail. This would remove the ability to mask the relationship between costs and prices: retail prices would fall as well as rise clearly and unambiguously as pool prices changed.
[G]The grid, which delivers electricity and gas into our homes and is the guarantor that the lights won’t go out, must be in public ownership, as is Network Rail in the rail industry. It should also be connected to a pan-European grid for additional security. Green commitments, or decisions to support developing renewables, should be paid out of general taxation to take the poll tax element out of energy bills, with the rich paying more than the poor for the public good. Because returns on investment take decades in the energy industry, despite what free market fundamentalists argue, the state has to assume financial responsibility of energy investment as it is doing with nuclear and renewables.
[H]The British energy industry has gone from nationalisation to privatisation and back to government control in the space of 25 years. Although the energy industry is nominally in private hands, we have exactly the same approach of government picking winners and dictating investment plans that was followed with disastrous consequences from the Second World War to the mid 1980s. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the consumer got unfair treatment because long-term investment plans and contracts promoted by the government required electricity companies to use expensive local coal.
[I]The energy industry is, once again, controlled by the state. The same underlying drivers dictate policy in the new world of state control. It is not rational economic thinking and public-interested civil servants that determine policy, but interest groups. Going back 30 years, it was the coal industry—both management and unions—and the nuclear industry that dictated policy. Tony Benn said he had "never known such a well-organised scientific, industrial and technical lobby". Today, it is green pressure groups, EU parliamentarians and commissioners and, often, the energy industry itself that are loading burdens on to consumers. When the state controls the energy industry, whether through the back or the front door, it is vested interests(既得利益)that get their way and the consumer who pays.
[J]So how did we get to where we are today? In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the industry was entirely privatised. It was recognised that there were natural monopoly elements and so prices in these areas were regulated. At the same time, the regulator was given a duty to promote competition. From 1998, all domestic energy consumers could switch supplier for the first time and then wholesale markets were liberalised, allowing energy companies to source the cheapest forms of energy. Arguably, this was the high water mark of the liberalisation of the industry.
[K]Privatisation was a great success. Instead of investment policy being dictated by the impulses of government and interest groups, it became dictated by long-term commercial considerations. Sadly, the era of liberalised markets, rising efficiency and lower bills did not last long. Both the recent Labour governments and the coalition have pursued similar policies of intervention after intervention to send the energy industry almost back to where it started.
[L]One issue that unites left and many on the paternalist right is that of energy security. We certainly need government intervention to keep the lights on and ensure that we are not over-dependent on energy from unstable countries. But it should also be noted that there is nothing more insecure than energy arising from a policy determined by vested interests without any concern for commercial considerations. Energy security will not be achieved by requiring energy companies to invest in expensive sources of supply and by making past investments redundant through regulation. It will also not be achieved by making the investment environment even more uncertain. Several companies all seeking the cheapest supplies from diverse sources will best serve the interests of energy security.
[M]The UK once had an inefficient and expensive energy industry. After privatisation, costs fell as the industry served the consumer rather than the mining unions and pro-nuclear interests. Today, after a decade or more of increasing state control, we have an industry that serves vested interests rather than the consumer interest once again. Electricity prices before taxes are now 15% higher than the average of major developed nations. Electricity could be around 50% cheaper without government interventions. We must liberalise again and not complete the circle by returning to nationalisation.
The cost related to renewable developments should be paid by general taxation.
选项
答案
G
解析
根据general taxation锁定G段。G段第3句提到,绿色承诺或支持可再生能源的决策应该由普通税收支付,而不是通过能源法案里的人头税。所以本题是G段第3句前半句的同义转述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BRF7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
AlmostathirdofallAmericansaretossingandturning,unabletogetagoodnight’ssleepbecausethey’reworryingaboutthee
German’sEducationSystem[A]Germanyinventedthemodernuniversitybutlongagolostitsleadingpositiontoothercountries,e
Thefirststeptodefeatinganenemyistopindownhisexactidentityandhowheoperates.Hypertension—chronic,abnormallyrai
A、Howhebecameanannouncer.B、Howhewritesnewsstories.C、Howhemakeshisliving.D、Howhedoeshisjob.D四个选项均是以“Howhe+动词
A、Theirboss.B、Acolleague.C、Theirworkload.D、Acoffeemachine.B对话中女士奇怪为什么Rod没有涨工资,男士说那是因为老板觉得他的工作态度有问题,老板说她看到Rob在咖啡机边的时间比在办
京剧(BeijingOpera)是中国最具影响力的剧种。它起源于徽剧,后来又吸收了几种古老的地方戏剧,最终形成了现在的京剧。京剧被称作“东方歌剧”,因为它也集歌唱、舞蹈、美术、文学等艺术于一体。京剧中的“生、旦、净、丑(sheng,dan,jing,ch
DanielDevlinlivesinthesamehousewithhischildrenandseesthemeveryday—yetheisunabletorecognizethematall.Mr.D
Agroupofspermwhalesappeartohavetakeninadeformedbottlenosedolphin,marineresearchershavediscovered.Behaviora
A、Listening.B、Writing.C、Translating.D、Interpreting.B事实细节题。本题问的是下列哪项是与学生的新工作相关的技能。短文在后半部分提到,随着试验的进行,学生意识到在学校中学到的写作、阅读和数学技能都与他
A、Tohelpthemgainindependence.B、Tohelpthemmakedecisions.C、Togiveadvicetothem.D、Toofferthemfoodandmoney.A事实细节
随机试题
男,30岁。咽痛、咳嗽、发热,2周后发现尿色红,眼睑浮肿,尿量1000ml/24h。体检:全身皮肤未见皮疹,血压150/100mmHg。化验:尿蛋白(++),红细胞50~60/HP,血白蛋白32g/L,血肌酐123μmol/L。上述临床表现最可能的诊断
太阳头痛的部位阳明头痛的部位
安某,男,62岁。无明显诱因腰部疼痛半年,腰部隐隐作痛,酸软无力,缠绵不愈。其证型是
不可以进行骨髓移植治疗的血液病是
某放大电路的微变等效电路如图7-97所示,已知:Rb=82kΩ,RC=5.6kΩ,rbe=4.2kΩ,RL=22kΩ,电路的输入电阻ri和输出电阻ro分别为()。
背景资料:某施工单位承接了一座公路隧道的土建及交通工程施工项目,该隧道为单洞双向行驶的两车道浅埋隧道,设计净高为5m,净宽为12m,总长为1600m,穿越的岩层主要由页岩和砂岩组成,裂隙发育,设计采用新奥法施工、分部开挖和复合式衬砌。进场后,项目部与所
当收集、加工信息时,应注意信息的()。
根据下表所示的实验设计方案(a、b为两个自变量,S为被试),回答问题。在该实验设计中,不存在的误差是
党的十九大报告指出,要坚持问题导向,保持战略定力,推动全面从严治党向纵深发展。从严治党的重中之重是
Whatisthemaintopicoftheconversation?
最新回复
(
0
)