首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
52
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
How long has the Envisat satellite been used for?
选项
A、5 years
B、7 years
C、10 years
D、3 years
答案
C
解析
本题为细节题。文章第二段提到:“Envisat had,unlike much of Europe,forgone early retirement:designed for five years of operation,it was on its tenth.”因此答案C正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/C01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whenyouchooseafreezer,rememberit’sprobablygoingtobewithyouforalongtime.Nosinglestyleorsizeisbest,soit’s
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout’?
Today,theAustralianpopulationisstillmainlyofBritish______.
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout?
Whatisthespeakertalkingabout?
Whatisthespeakertalkingabout?
DivorceInarbitration,thedivorcecaseispresentedtoaneutralpartycalledanarbitratorwho,likeajudge,hasthepo
Theyear1400openedwithmorepeacefulnessthanusualinEngland.Onlyafewmonthsbefore,RichardII,weak,wicked,andtreac
Ascientistwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendtheirmoneymuststudyconsumerbehavior.Hemustobtain
随机试题
关于颈动脉体和主动脉体化学感受性反射的叙述,错误的是()。
某配对资料经秩和检验,得T=T+=16.5,n=9,经查表得T0.1/2(9)=8~37,T0.05/2(9)=5~40,T0.01/2(9)=1~44,则下列结果正确的是
甲公司系一家互联网信息公司,未经搜房网运营方同意,劫持搜房网数据,在搜房网页面主页右上角设置弹窗,在用户访问搜房网时,甲公司所投放的广告将自动弹出。对于甲公司的行为,下列哪一说法是正确的?
持会计从业资格证书人员从事会计工作,应当自从事会计工作之日起( )内,向单位所在地或所属部门、系统的会计从业资格管理机构办理注册登记。
加工贸易剩余料件结转至另一个加工贸易合同出口时,必须符合一定的条件。下列选项中不属于这些条件的是()
两种证券组成的投资组合其可行域是一条组合线,而由三种证券组成的投资组合其可行域是坐标系中的一个区域。()
Whatisbeingpractisedifateacherasksstudentstoreadwordslike"cot,hot"and"dog,log"?
小女孩甲(8岁)与小男孩乙(12岁)放学后常结伴回家。一日,甲对乙讲:“听说我们回家途中的王家昨日买了一条狗,我们能否绕道回家?”乙答:“不要怕!被狗咬了我负责。”后甲和乙路经王家同时被狗咬伤住院。该案赔偿责任应如何承担?()
人类的寿命与基因有关,体内有多个基因______着你的生命长短。研究表明,那些在恶劣环境下控制机体防御功能的基因,能够显著地改善多种生物的健康状况并且延长其寿命。了解这些基因的运作______,或许可以帮助我们找到消除老年疾病、延长人类生命的秘诀。填入画横
某高校就业处将于2013年12月23日在校体育馆举行综合人才招聘会,特别邀请各用人单位,企业、机构等前来参加。请根据上述活动的描述,利用MicrosoftWord制作一份邀请函(邀请函的参考样式请参考[Word-邀请函参考样式.docx]文件)
最新回复
(
0
)