首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
62
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
How long has the Envisat satellite been used for?
选项
A、5 years
B、7 years
C、10 years
D、3 years
答案
C
解析
本题为细节题。文章第二段提到:“Envisat had,unlike much of Europe,forgone early retirement:designed for five years of operation,it was on its tenth.”因此答案C正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/C01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whenwearetoholdthesportsmeet______beendecided.Whetherhesucceedsorfails______matter.
Thegovernment______discussedthematterforalongtimebuttheyhaveshownnosignsofreachinganagreement.
Aladywasreportedinthenewspaper______nearthepoliceofficeyesterday.
Itwastheordinary______oftheWaldorfAstoriaHotel,andthefollowingwordswerewrittenuponitinafaintdelicatehandwr
The_____crownjewelsarekeptintheTowerofLondon.
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout?
Theconstructionofthesecond-ringviaducthasbeen______forthreemonths.
DivorceInarbitration,thedivorcecaseispresentedtoaneutralpartycalledanarbitratorwho,likeajudge,hasthepo
Alovemarriage,however,doesnotnecessarily______muchsharingofinterestsandres-ponsibilities.
TheEnglishlanguageexistsinaconditionofeverlastingdanger,itsAmericanbranchmostparticularly,assaultedasitisfrom
随机试题
(2009年4月,2007年4月)“无形财产权的创立、内容和消灭,依使用行为或侵权行为发生地国家法律。”这一规定体现的学说是_____。
女性,68岁。原有肺心病病史。受凉后发热伴咳脓痰,发绀加重,次日神志模糊,嗜睡,血压90/67.5mmHg(12.0/9.0kPa),无病理反射。患者最可能并发
应用氯磷定治疗有机磷中毒可以( )。
医师注册后有下列情形之一的应当注销注册,除了
一次性使用输液器的基本质量要求内容涉及到
Windows操作系统是()。
财务评价是根据(),计算和分析项目的盈利状况。
郧西是一个集老、少、边、山于一体的贫困县,该县95%左右属于山区,最远的村民小组距乡(镇)政府驻地有70多公里,一些偏远山村的群众到乡镇办事,来回要走十几公里。往往因为不熟人、不熟路、不熟办事程序,找到部门又无人办事、办不了事,常常为办一个证、盖一个章、签
阅读以下说明和Java码,将应填入(n)处的字名写在的对应栏内。[说明]打印输出10行杨晖三角形。形式如下:杨晖三角形:1111211331146411510105116152015611
Naturally,inagroupofanimalsasdiverseasthesnakes,andwithsomanyvariedenemies,therearenumerousdefensivereactio
最新回复
(
0
)