首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
admin
2017-01-16
31
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
[A] A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity.
[B] Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated (复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
[C] Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
[D] One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied (小众的) pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m-7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish (消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
[E] Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct. And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such fake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
[F] Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis (假设) are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
[G] The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
[H] All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing (基因组测序) into a flow of truly significant ones.
[I] Ideally, research protocols (草案) should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are. (It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.) Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
[J] The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
[K] Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some clinical trials from 2000 to 2010 were later abandoned by reason of mistakes or improperness.
选项
答案
B
解析
本题涉及目前学术问题的危害,由clinical trials from 2000 to 2010和mistakes or improperness可以定位到B段最后一句。原文提到2000年到2010年间一些临床试验因为试验所依据的研究存在错误或者不当之处而被撤销,题中by reason of对应原文because of,本题是对B段最后一句的同义转述,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CBi7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Bonesbecomeweakerandbreakeasily.B、Bonematerialchangeswithtime.C、Thebackbonespressclosertogether.D、Cushionsbe
CarbonCaptureHasclimatechangemadeitharderforpeopletocareaboutconservation?A)LastSeptember,assomeonewh
Photographersarealwayslookingfornewinspiration,atleastthegoodonesare.Theireyesareconstantlysearchingforthat【B
Photographersarealwayslookingfornewinspiration,atleastthegoodonesare.Theireyesareconstantlysearchingforthat【B
A、Itcannotberemoved.B、Itisfromsomedrinks.C、Itismadebythewoman.D、Itisnewlymade.A
A、Torunasfastastheycan.B、Totakealongmimingrace.C、Tokeeprunningwithoutstopping.D、Tomakesuretheyarehealthy
Timeisrunningoutforgovernmentstooverhaulregulationofglobalbanksthathavebecomebiggerandmorepowerfulsincethes
Anewstudyreportsthecommondrugaspiringreatlyreduceslife-threateningproblemsafteranoperationto【B1】______blockedbl
Sinceearlytimes,peoplehavebeenfascinatedwiththeideaoflifeexistingsomewhereelsebesidesearth.Untilrecently,scie
中国通过动员(mobilize)全社会的资源来发展学前教育。虽然当地政府会开办幼儿园,但也鼓励单位团体、社会组织以及个人去开办幼儿园。幼儿园采用将儿童保育和教育相结合的原则,并且保证幼儿得到体力、智力、道德和美学的(aesthetic)全方位发展。让玩耍成
随机试题
在个人的职业生涯中的_______阶段,最关心工作中的成长、发展和晋升()
根据国标《卫生陶瓷》GB6952,瓷质卫生陶瓷的吸水率()。
股骨头主要的血液供应来源是
A.阴阜B.阴蒂C.阴道前庭D.大阴唇E.小阴唇耻骨联合前面隆起的脂肪垫
某海港航道疏浚工程长20km,设计底高程一20.0m(当地理论深度基准面),航道浚前平均高程为一9.0m(当地理论深度基准面),其中有一段长1.5km的浅水段,浚前高程一7.0~一8.0m(当地理论深度基准面),当地平均高潮位为+1.5m(黄海平均海平面
企业持有存货的最终目的是()。
阅读下面出自于人教版义务教育课程标准实验教科书《地理》关于河流一课的内容,回答下面问题。材料一《义务教育地理课程标准(2011年版)》此标准要求:“举例说出河流在区域发展中的作用。以某区域为例,说明区域发展对生活方式和生活质量的影响。”材料二下面为
蒲松龄(1640—1715),出身没落地主家庭,一生热衷科举,却始终不得志,71岁时才破例补为贡生,因此对科举制度的不合理深有感触。他耗尽毕生精力完成《聊斋志异》8卷、491篇,约40余万字。其内容丰富多彩,故事多采自民间传说和野史轶闻,将花妖狐魅和幽冥世
在VisualFoxPro中,运行当前文件夹下的表单T1.SCX的命令是【】。
将考生文件夹下NIAN文件夹中的文件夹TXT复制到考生文件夹下并命名为“CUT”。
最新回复
(
0
)