首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
29
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word deride in Paragraph 10 is closest in meaning to ______.
选项
A、mock
B、assist
C、haste
D、ignore
答案
A
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词deride的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:那些deride为家庭诉讼开庭提议的人忽略了一点,即只有在很极端的情况下,父母才会把他的孩子送上公堂。根据上下文可以判断出deride的意思是“嘲笑”,故正确答案为选项A。选项B(帮助)、C(匆忙)和D(忽视)都不合题意,因此不能选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/COyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Questions7-10Completethefollowingtableofinformationaboutthewalks.
Questions37-38CompletethefollowingnotesonreducingreversecultureshockusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.•wh
SECTION4Questions31-40Questions31-33CompletethefollowingnotesondifferencesyoumightnoticewhenyougohomeusingNO
SECTION2Questions11-20Questions11-13CompletethefollowinginformationusingONEwordforeachgap.Thespeakerrecommends
Questions21-25AnswerthefollowingquestionsusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethesummarybelow.UseNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PROJECTMANAGENTLastweek’sdefinitionofpro
Questions18-20Completethesentencesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.BowelCoachingCourseCoacheshelppeoplema
Mostimportantindicatorsofsuccess(%)Happyfamilylife82%Goodhealthand【L5】________79%Jobsatisfaction73%【L6】________(
PersonalDetailsFamilyname:PetersAddress:7【L4】_______Crescent,MountLawleyPhonenumber:
(The)federalsystem(of)governmentinCanada(is)similarto(it)oftheUnitedStates.
随机试题
提出态度的认知不协调理论的心理学家是()
Howoftenonehearschildrenwishingtheyweregrownup,andoldpeoplewishingtheywereyoungagain.Eachagehasitspleasure
急性化脓性阑尾炎的腹痛性质为
骑跨伤多引起妇科或直肠手术多引起
内分泌疾病检查方法中属于功能诊断检查的是
A.药物因素B.性别因素C.给药方法D.生活和饮食习惯E.工作和生活环境静滴、静注、肌注不良反应发生率较高
陈某与A企业签订了为期2年的劳动合同,月工资1500元(当地最低月工资标准为1000元)。期满终止合同时,A企业未向陈某提出以不低于原工资标准续订劳动合同意向,A企业应向陈某支付的经济补偿金额为()元。
在精神科临床诊断中,躁狂发作并不包括()。
从长远来看,欧盟征收银行税的风险警示意义要远远大于其现实的经济意义。对于中国而言,征收银行税短期内并不现实,但这并不等于我们可以对金融机构的风险疏于管理,中国金融业高盈利的成绩下面同样蕴藏着非常大的潜在风险。30年来中国银行存款资金来源充足,但投资需求增长
国家机关工作人员甲,因不满父亲再婚,与之断绝往来,在父亲晚年孤身一人、身患重病时拒绝予以照顾,情节恶劣,构成遗弃罪。在本案中,甲违反了()。
最新回复
(
0
)