首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"? A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"? A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama
admin
2022-07-28
43
问题
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"?
A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama commemorated the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty with his own call for new policies to address the continued struggles of tens of millions of Americans.
B) In his official statement, Obama remarked that, "In the richest nation on earth, far too many children are still born into poverty, far too few have a fair shot to escape it, and Americans of all races and backgrounds experience wages and incomes that aren’t rising… That does not mean…abandoning the War on Poverty. In fact, if we hadn’t declared ’unconditional war on poverty in America,’ millions more Americans would be living in poverty today. Instead, it means we must redouble our efforts to make sure our economy works for every working American."
C) It would seem hard to argue with such sentiments, yet some have done so. Fox News published a piece saying "despite trillions spent, poverty won". Many others react by shaking their heads sadly, acknowledging the noble effort and concluding that it was an unfortunate failure. The implication is clear: government spent a mint and did not end poverty, and now Obama is calling for more of the same.
D) This raises two crucial questions: did the first "war" really fail? And what should we do today?
E) As for the first, when Lyndon Johnson called for an end to poverty on January 8, 1964, he continued the tradition of the New Deal and decades of American policy designed to provide all Americans with basic standards of living—housing, education, healthcare and jobs. Americans believed that an activist government could achieve those goals, hence the trillions of dollars directed at the War on Poverty.
F) Those trillions have over time reduced the official "poverty rate" from 19 percent to 15 percent. Many have concluded that such a minor shift wasn’t worth the massive expense. Johnson’s legacy was destroyed by the chaos unleashed by opposition to the Vietnam War and by the dilemma of the 1970s, and the Reagan revolution of the 1980s was predicated in part on a conviction that the government’s attempt to alleviate the plight of the poor was not only social engineering, but badly-done social engineering.
G) Yet poverty today is of a different order than poverty 50 or 100 years ago. During the Great Depression, millions of Americans were still without electricity or running water. By the 1960s that had changed, but many people still lacked basic healthcare, and the elderly were often at the mercy of their families. Today, there is still widespread poverty as defined by official income statistics, but the conditions of poverty are materially different.
H) In part, that is because of the safety net we have since created. Many conservatives believe that we were better off in a world where private charity groups and religious organizations provided assistance, rather than government programs such as food stamps, welfare, unemployment benefits, social security and disability payments. But while that world did place much greater stock in self-reliance, it also left far more people at a huge disadvantage, struggling for life’s basic necessities. You could— and some do—argue that such a world produced heartier souls more able to cope with life’s vicissitudes (变迁). You could also argue—and should—that such a world was harsh and destructive to many in ways that humans for centuries have strived to ameliorate (改善).
I) Today we have a massive social safety net, thanks to both the New Deal and the substantial expansion of federal and state programs beginning in the 1960s. These programs soon included housing as well. Many have seen more waste than not, and housing programs in particular did not fare well, as the scarred urban landscape of housing projects demonstrates.
J) But that safety net—much of which is not well-captured in the per capita income statistics that are used to assess the poverty rate—did create a set of expectations about the minimum level of necessities that all Americans deserve. That minimum— consisting of adequate shelter, food, heat and air conditioning, public education, and access to healthcare for the elderly—is a reality today.
K) The real criticism, however, and the area we should focus on in the years ahead, is that because Americans are divided about this safety net, we accomplish two things, neither of which are the best. We spend trillions on programs designed to provide some level of basic security, and yet these programs remain controversial. Significant opposition to these programs and the constant threat that they could be cut means that instead of providing security, they create insecurity, and because of that opposition, it becomes almost impossible to discuss how they could be improved, rather than maintained or terminated.
L) The result is something of a worst of all possible worlds: We maintain a vast safety net while pretending that we do not, and many of us act as if safety nets are at best ineffective and at worst immoral. The net result is that as a society, we find ourselves unable to enact needed reforms.
M) The answer, then, is to recognize that in securing many basic necessities, the War on Poverty succeeded, either in actually ensuring that those necessities exist, or in establishing that having them is a fundamental right. Even the most malicious opponents to social safety net programs accept that right, which would not have been the case well into the 20th century. The programs may not have altered the poverty rate, but in part that’s because we have constantly reset and raised the bar about what we consider to be the most basic resources that every American deserves. Our "enough" today is considerably greater than it was fifty years ago.
N) The next solutions to the challenges of today’s poverty, therefore, are not better public housing and Medicaid. We do not need the same approach that various administrations have been advocating for the past 50 years. We need instead a consensus about what we believe are the next level of basic material rights of every citizen—beyond food, clothing and shelter. Many of those—such as self-esteem, the tools to build careers, the ability to navigate a world defined by information rather than manufacturing—are within the ability of government to provide.
O) State and local governments have been laboratories of new initiatives—from work and training programs, to partnerships between local businesses and community colleges, to food banks. Thankfully, such initiatives at all levels of governments require less money than more traditional social services. They also demand more flexibility. Government programs defined not by ideology but by flexibility and the ability to help private and local institutions act—not by giving them grants as the War on Poverty did, but via tax incentives that help run programs—that would be welcome innovation, and the best way to continue the legacy of the War on Poverty. And with the federal government unlikely to spend more in today’s climate, it may also be the only way.
The programs may have failed to reduce the poverty rates, but it is partially due to the rising standard of being out of poverty.
选项
答案
M
解析
题干意为,这些项目可能并没有降低贫困率,但这部是因为脱贫线标准的不断提高。根据题干中的关键词the programs,poverty rates,partially due to和rising standard可定位到M段。该段第三句提到,这些项目也许并没有改变贫困率,但这部分源于我们一直不断地重设和提高我们认为是每个美国人应得的最基本资源的标杆。由此可知,题干是对原文的同义转述,故选M。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Cix7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
龙,一种仅出现在神话故事中的动物,在英文中是邪恶的象征。在英语文化中,龙是中撒旦(Satan)的化身。然而在中国传统文化中,龙是为人类造福的动物。龙在中文里是吉祥、权威和珍稀的象征。现在龙在中国人的心目中依然享有崇高的地位,中国人自称“龙的传人”。龙成为民
A、Sellingdirecttothepublic.B、Sellingthroughtheirownchains.C、Sellingbyonlinestores.D、Sellingthroughsmallshops.C
A、Rightaway.B、Intwomonths.C、Earlynextmonth.D、Inacoupleofdays.C从选项预测本题问时间。男士跟女士说下月初她才可以开始上岗,这是否会对她有影响,女士回答说没有影响,故选C。
A、Encouragingotherstofollowhiswrong-doingB、Stealingendangeredanimalsfromthezoo.C、Organisingpeopleagainsttheautho
A、Lackofvitaminsisthemaincauseofskincancer.B、Newresearchprovesthatsunbathingcausesnoproblemsatall.C、Thedang
A、Becausesheisontheexecutivestaff.B、Becausesheisfamiliarwiththecompany.C、Becauseshehasknowledgeofmanagement.
A、Givethecustomeratenpercentdiscount.B、Claimcompensationfromthesteelsuppliers.C、AsktheBuyingDepartmenttochange
A、Thelongerournapis,themoreenergywewillget.B、A20-minutenapwillhelptorestoreourenergy.C、Ashort-timenapdoes
A、Shewasveryluckytoseemanywhales.B、Shedidn’tgotothewhale-watchingtrip.C、Shedidn’tseeawhaleonherwhale-watch
A、Onethird.B、Almosttwothirds.C、Morethantwothirds.D、Almosthalf.B录音提到,根据调查,63%的美国成年人没有8个小时的睡眠时间,这8个小时是健康身体、安全优良工作表现所需要的
随机试题
商业银行将其对工商企业已经贴现的票据向中央银行再办理贴现的资金融通行为指的是()
患者王某,男,25岁,江苏人。近1个多月来发热、咳嗽、痰中带血,伴胸痛、乏力,前来就诊。问病史,曾多次生食早市的“醉石蟹”。查体:T37.9℃,心脏正常,两肺呼吸音减弱,肝脾不大。实验室检查:白细胞10×109/L,嗜酸性粒细胞16%。X线胸片见肺下部纹
影响照片颗粒性的因素,不包括
移植“增强”效应是指
采用超声法检测混凝土表面损伤层厚度,两个换能器的连线方向应尽量避免与主钢筋方向平行。()
城乡规划的行政法制监督的基本原则不包括()。
某中外合资经营企业的投资总额为1800万美元。在其注册资本中,中方认缴的出资额为500万美元。根据中外合资经营企业法律制度的规定,下列关于外方认缴出资最低限额的表述中,正确的是()。
(2007年卷二第45条)根据《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》关于地理标志的规定,各成员应当为有利害关系的各方提供制止下列哪些行为的法律手段?
某社区社会工作者在“三八妇女节”开展了面向社区妇女的专场招聘会,有380名妇女赶赴招聘会现场,其中203名妇女在当天与企业达成了就业意向。从促进社会就业来看,社会工作者的工作属于()。
You______yesterdayifyouarereallyseriousaboutthejob.
最新回复
(
0
)