首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
137
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
At the end of the passage, the author seems to imply that the success of the bill depends upon ______.
选项
A、strict enforcement
B、public support
C、government assurance
D、filial awareness
答案
D
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:文章的末尾,作者好像暗示提案要取得成功取决于什么?文章的最后一句说:“Those of us who plashed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.”这句话的意思是:“如果提案只是作为一种鼓励而不被急于实施,我们这些推举提案的人就可以认为自己完全成功了。”这与选项D(孝顺意识)是一致的,故选项D为最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DOyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethenotesonthepoliceusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.•don’tbeaggressive•donottrytobribepolice
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Decidewhichnumbersyouwoulddialineachsituation.Writetheappropriateletteronyouranswersheet.A.020B.0161
SECTION3Questions21-30Questions21-25CompletethefollowingstatementsusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.
Completethesummarybelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.Afterhighschoolsomepeopletravel,finda(a
Completethelecturenotes.UseNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PurposeoftheminilectureToexperience【T32】______
Oneofthe(mostimpressive)culturalachievementsoftheUnitedState(during)the1920’swasa(vastly)outpouringof(serious
(Independencepolitical)ofnewspapers(became)a(commonfeature)of(journalism)intheUnitedStatesofthe1840’sand1850’s
NotuntiltheFirstWorldWar______toimprovetheroadsystemintheUnitedStates.
随机试题
沟槽测量误差产生的原因有选用量具不适当、测量位置不准确和()。
在x=0处()。
患者,女,18岁。右食指被铁钉刺伤7天,现头晕头痛,张口不利,咀嚼无力。其诊断是
凉膈散的组成含有
有关腺苷,不正确的是( )。
下列关于应急预案说法正确的是()。
常见的压力容器由哪几部分组成?
香港联交所规定,如果公司在相同的管理层人员的管理下有连续3年的营业记录,以往3年盈利合计5000万港元,并且市值不低于1亿港元,则可以上市。()
关于文房四宝,下列说法错误的是()。
A、68%.B、23%.C、40%.D、50%.BNeil提到,调查发现23%的人会下车,答案为B。
最新回复
(
0
)