首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
admin
2015-10-21
92
问题
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question; "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" ,in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S.— meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying"yes"—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish)every year.
Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. "You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man(I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that" generally speaking, people cannot be trusted "are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on.
Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital"—networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild"social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital— old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
The author’s attitude towards Halpern’s survey is one of______.
选项
A、slight antipathy
B、blanket approval
C、slight disapproval
D、strong disapproval
答案
C
解析
态度题。第四段开头指出,这项调查的确是有益的,但是也需要做些说明。问题在于如果像去年那样,调查时仅仅询问是否“总的来说,大部分人是可以信任的”,人们的回答或许没有经过深思熟虑。由此可知,作者对Halpem调查的态度总体上是肯定的,只是有些小小的质疑,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DWKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheAmericanWay:FreedomTheheartoftheAmericancalendarisJuly【4】Americanshavecelebratedthisdateas"Independence
Darwin’s______theorycontributedtothedecayofVictorianism.
WilliamFaulknerwastheforemostAmerican______writerofthe20thcentury.
WithafewhourstogobeforesouthSudanbecomesan【N1】______state,finalpreparationsareunderwayinthecapitalJuba.Theg
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In1959,heclaims,herestoredadeadfriendtolife
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In1959,heclaims,herestoredadeadfriendtolife
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?Hashigh-speedInternetmadeyouimpatientwithslo
Forthelast82years,Sweden’sNobelAcademyhasdecidedwhowillreceivetheNobelPrizeinLiterature,therebydeterminewho
Cigarettesleaveyouwithmorethanasmokyscentonyourclothesandfingernails.Anewstudyhasfoundevidencetobacco【M1】__
Thepopularnotionaboutmarriageandloveisthattheyaresynonymous,thattheyspringfromthesamemotives,andcoverthes
随机试题
举例说明普通话中“轻声”的作用。
根据涉及时间长短及范围广狭的综合性标准将计划分类为()。
慢性化脓性中耳炎的常见分型是
正常外周血粒细胞依据颗粒特点的不同分为
张女穿行马路时遇车祸,致两颗门牙缺失。交警出具的责任认定书认定司机负全责。张女因无法与肇事司机达成赔偿协议,遂提起民事诉讼,认为司机虽赔偿3,000元安装假牙,但假牙影响接吻,故司机还应就她的“接吻权”受到损害予以赔偿。关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的?(
背景:某建设单位新建办公楼,与甲施工单位签订施工总承包合同。该工程门厅大堂内墙设计做法为干挂石材,多功能厅隔墙设计做法为石膏板骨架隔墙。施工过程中发生下列事件:事件一:建设单位将该工程所有门窗单独发包,并与具备相应资质条件的乙施工单位签
根据我国《建设工程安全生产管理条例》的规定,对下列不属于达到一定规模的危险性较大的分部分项工程编制专项施工方案,并附具安全验算结果,经施工单位技术负责人、总监理工程师签字后实施,由专职安全生产管理人员进行现场监督的工程是()。
当前,信息化浪潮一次比一次更猛烈地冲击着我们的“头脑”,只有不断深入阅读,体验并适应数字化生存方式,了解新时代的“精神本质”和“生存法则”,培育出一种“世界眼光”和“世界精神”,才能从容、理性、睿智地面对新世界、新生活。新时代读什么书?必须结合世界发展大势
中华人民共和国的国家机构实行( )原则。
Educationisalongprocessthatnotonlyprovidesuswithbasicskillssuchasliteracyandnumeracy,butisalsoessentialin
最新回复
(
0
)