首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Bad Investment Take it from a businessman: The War on Drugs is just money down the drain. As a Republican, I’m neither sof
Bad Investment Take it from a businessman: The War on Drugs is just money down the drain. As a Republican, I’m neither sof
admin
2010-07-19
42
问题
Bad Investment
Take it from a businessman: The War on Drugs is just money down the drain.
As a Republican, I’m neither soft on crime nor pro-drugs in any sense. I believe a person who harms another person should be punished. But as a successful businessman, I also believe that locking up more and more people who are nonviolent drug offenders, the people whose real problem is that they are addicted to drugs, is simply a waste of money and human resources.
Drugs are a handicap. I don’t think anyone should use them. But if a person is using marijuana in his or her own home, doing no harm to anyone other than arguably to himself or herself, should that person be arrested and put in jail? In my opinion, the answer is no.
Any social policy or endeavor should be evaluated based on its actual effectiveness, just as in business any investment should be evaluated based on its returns. By that standard, the nationwide drug war is a failure. After 20-plus years of zero-tolerance policies and increasingly harsh criminal penalties, we have over half a million people behind bars on drug charges nationwide—more than the total prison population in all of Western Europe. We’re spending billions of dollars to keep them locked up. Yet the federal government’s own research demonstrates that drugs are cheaper, purer, and more readily available than when this war started. Heroin use is up. Ecstasy use is up. Teenagers say that marijuana is easier to get than alcohol. No matter how you slice it, this is no success story.
In 1981, the federal government spent about $1.5 billion on the drug war. Today, we spend almost $20 billion a year at the federal level, with the states spending at least that much again. In 1980, the federal government arrested a few hundred thousand people on drug charges; today we arrest 1.6 million people a year for drug offenses. Yet we still have a drug problem. Should we continue until the federal government spends $40 billion and arrests 3.2 million people a year for drugs? What about $80 billion and 6.4 million arrests? The logical conclusion of this is that we’ll be spending the entire gross national product on drug-law enforcement and still not be addressing our drug problem. I believe the costs outweigh the benefits.
In New Mexico, the cost to the state of treating drug use as a crime is over $43 million per year and this does not even include local and federal expenditures, which nearly triple that number. Over hair of that money goes to corrections costs. Yet despite this outlay, New Mexico has one of the highest rates of drug-related crime and one of the highest heroin-usage rates in the nation. Our results dictate that our money be spent another way. That’s why I have called for a reevaluation of my state’s current drug strategies, and we have begun to make great progress in this area.
A study by the RAND Corporation shows that every dollar spent on treatment instead of imprisonment saves $7 in state costs. Treatment is significantly more effective at reducing drug use than jail and prison. I believe the most cost-effective way to deal with nonviolent drug users would be to stop prosecuting them, and instead to make an effective spectrum of treatment services available to those who request it.
I propose a new bottom line for evaluating our success. Currently, our government measures the success of our drug policies by whether drug use went up or down, or whether seizures went up or down, or how many acres of coca we eradicated in South America. These are absolutely the wrong criteria. Instead of asking how many people smoked marijuana last year, we should ask if drug-related crime went up or down. Instead of asking how many people did heroin last year, we should ask whether heroin overdoses went up or down. We should ask if public nuisances associated with drug use and dealing went up or down. In short, we should be trying to reduce the harm caused by and suffered by drug users, instead of simply trying to lock them all up. A drug policy that has these questions in mind would be much more sensible, pragmatic, and cost-effective than our current one.
We need to reform our drug policies. The goal should be to help those addicted to drugs to find a better way. The answer is not imprisonment and legal attack. The answer lies in sentencing reform, in supplying treatment on demand, and in delivering honest drug education to our kids. We need policies that reflect what we know about drug addiction rather than policies that seek to punish it. The days of a drug war waged against our people should come to an end. If we take a new approach—one that deals with drugs through a medical model rather than a criminal justice model—I guarantee that prison rates will drop, violent crime will decrease, property crime will decrease, overdose deaths will decrease, AIDS and hepatitis C will decrease, and more of those needing treatment for drug abuse will receive it.
If we take these and other "harm reduction" approaches toward drug use, we will spend many times less than what we currently spend on the drug war, and the benefit will be a society with less death, disease, crime, suffering, and imprisonment. By any measure, that’s a more sensible investment. (899 words)
Which of the following statements do you think that the author would agree to?
选项
A、The drug policies should be reconsidered and rectified.
B、The federal government should conduct more researches.
C、Almost half of the nonviolent drug users should be set free.
D、The evaluation standards should be more realistic and feasible.
答案
A
解析
根据短文的意思,美国政府应该改变目前的反毒政策(We need to reform our drug policies)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DflO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、theylikeinvestmentsB、theylikechallengesC、theylikethejobD、theyliketheruralareaC
A、Profitoftheoverseasinvestment.B、Landpremiums.C、Salariestax.D、Stampduty.A
MultinationalCorporationsMultinationalinvestmenthas【1】________.【1】________.Establishmentofam
MultinationalCorporationsMultinationalinvestmenthas【1】________.【1】________.Establishmentofam
MultinationalCorporationsMultinationalinvestmenthas【1】________.【1】________.Establishmentofam
MultinationalCorporationsMultinationalinvestmenthas【1】________.【1】________.Establishmentofam
A、Profitoftheoverseasinvestment.B、Landpremiums.C、Salariestax.D、Stampduty.A
随机试题
患者,男,36岁。双下肢痿软无力5年余,逐渐加重,腰膝酸软,不能久立,腿胫大肉渐脱,眩晕耳鸣,舌咽干燥,遗精,盗汗,舌红少苔,脉细数。代表方是
提示胸腔手术后内出血的指征是引流管中每小时引流出血液量持续超过
背景资料某井工矿主井井筒设计深度650m,井筒净直径6.5m,建设单位经过公开招标同某施工单位签定了施工合同,合同专用条款规定,工程造价和工期的基础井筒涌水量20m3/h。井筒施工到385m位置时,放炮后井筒涌水量达到25m3/h。施工单位在没有采取措施
依法收贷向人民法院提起诉讼(或者向仲裁机关申请仲裁),银行如果不服地方人民法院第一审判决的,有权在判决书送达之日起()内向上一级人民法院提起上诉。
资产组组合,是指由若干个资产组组成的最小资产组组合,包括资产组或者资产组组合,以及不能按合理方法分摊的总部资产部分。()
资料:(1)A公司2012年的资产负债表和利润表如下所示:(2)A公司2011年的相关指标如下表。表中各项指标是根据当年资产负债表中有关项目的期末数与利润表中有关项目的当期数计算的。(3)计算财务比率时假设:“货币资金”全部为金融资产,
“12345609”,根据上述数字可猜断一成语为__________。
安得广厦千万间,大庇天下寒士俱欢颜,2017年我国()实现易地扶贫搬迁,有了温暖的新家,各类棚户区改造开工数提前完成600万套目标任务。
某汽车维修公司有部门、员工和顾客等实体,各实体对应的关系模式如下:部门(部门代码,部门名称,电话)员工(员工代码,姓名,部门代码)顾客(顾客号,姓名,年龄,性别)维修(顾客号,故障情况,维修日期,员工代码)假设每个部门允许有多部电话,则电话属性为
Hemadeaconsiderablesumofmoneyinrealestate.
最新回复
(
0
)