首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
admin
2013-08-22
36
问题
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B, C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
What is not true about regaining the initiative according to the passage?
选项
A、Good strategists can surely use some techniques to regain the initiative.
B、Trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of giving rise to a host of difficulties.
C、Though recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the procedures tend to be risky.
D、Though recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the negotiation may turn into an adversarial event.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Dj7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisHarmonyforLess?
Whattypeofbusinessdoesthespeakerworkfor?
Whattypeofbusinessisbeingdescribed?
Communication:thefactorsinvolvedingivinganeffectivepresentation
Canyougiveanexampleofhowyouworkedeffectivelywithpeopletoaccomplishanimportantresult?
Makingtravelarrangements旅行安排
Whatqualitiesdoesagoodemployeeneedtohave?(Whatshouldagoodemployeebelike?)
Whichspecialqualitiesdoyouthinkmanagersneedtohave?(Whatkindofpeopleshouldmanagersbe?Whatmakesagoodmanager?
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
A.GreenwoodPublishingGroupTheGreenwoodPublishingGroupisoneoftheworld’sleadingpublishersofreferencetitles,acade
随机试题
计算,其中D由Ox轴及曲线y=围成.
女性,76岁。反复咳嗽、咳痰伴喘息20余年,活动后气短5年,间断双下肢水肿1年,加重伴心悸1周。吸烟史30余年。查体:口唇发绀,桶状胸,双肺呼吸音粗,可闻及散在干啰音,双肺底可闻及水泡音,肝肋下2cm,双下肢凹陷性水肿。以下对明确诊断最有帮助的检查为
男性,28岁。2周前右脚受伤划破皮肤,未予注意。3天前高热、皮肤瘀点就诊。血压10.6/6.7kPa(80/50mmHg)。X线摄片肺实质未见明显病变。诊断败血症、感染性休克。经积极治疗血压仍不平稳,并出现气急,呼吸空气时PaO26kPa(45m
某业主欲投资建造一座五星级宾馆,业主方项目管理的进度目标指的是()。
下列项目中,属于境外经营或视同境外经营的有()。
甲股份有限公司和乙股份有限公司(以下简称“甲公司”和“乙公司”)均为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率均为17%。甲公司于2×14年1月31日销售一批商品给乙公司,销售价款为20000万元(不含增值税),同时收到乙公司签发并承兑的一张期限为6个月的无息商业
refertothefollowingarticle.Proponentsofdifferentjazzstyleshavealwaysarguedthattheirpredecessor’smusicalstyledi
根据所给材料回答问题。《四轮驱动》期刊为公开发行的汽车消费类月刊,广告业务实行自营。2013年10月,在该期刊记者站的操办下,驻地汽车生产企业M公司与期刊社签订了广告投放意向书,主要内容是“买下《四轮驱动》期刊2014年全年的底封广告位,每个广告
到2012年2月初,全国各省区市都已公布了2011年GDP数据,其中,排名前三甲的省份是()。
A、Ozoneisnotalwaysassociatedwithacidrain.B、Coldweatherwouldmaketheeffectsofpollutionworse.C、Manyindustriesare
最新回复
(
0
)