首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
admin
2011-03-10
76
问题
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by contrast, the United States developed the most unequal distribution of income and wages of any high-income country.
Some analysts see the gulf between the rich and the rest as an incentive for strivers, or as just the way things are. Others see it as having a corrosive effect on people’s faith in the markets and democracy. Still others contend that economic polarization is a root cause of America’s political polarization. Could, and should, something be done?
Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz, two Harvard economists, think yes. Their book, the Race Between Education and Technology (Harvard, $ 39.95), contain many tables, a few equations and a powerfully told story about how and why the United States became the world’s richest nation--namely, thanks to its schools.
The authors skillfully demonstrate that for more than a century, and at a steady rate, technological breakthroughs--the mass production system, electricity, computers--have been increasing the demand for ever more educated workers. And, they show, America’s school system met this demand, not with a national policy, but in grassroots fashion, as communities taxed themselves and built schools and colleges.
If only it were that easy.
The authors’ argument is really two books in one. One offers an incisive history of American education, especially the spread of the public high school and the state university system. It proves to be an uplifting tale of public commitment and open access. The authors remind us that the United States long remained "the best poor man’s country". A place where talent could rise.
The other story rigorously measures the impact of education on income. The authors’ compilation of hard data on educational attainment according to when people were bona is an awesome achievement, though not always a gripping read.
They show that by the 1850s, America’s school enrollment rate already "exceeded that of any other nation". And this lead held for a long time. By 1960, some 70 percent of Americans graduated from high school--far above the rate in any other country. College graduation rates also rose.
In the marketplace, such educational attainment was extremely valuable, but it didn’t produce wide economic disparity so long as more people were coming to the job market with education. The Wage premium-- or differential paid to people with a high school or a college education--fell between 1915 and 1950.
But more recently, high school graduation rates flatlined at around 70 percent. American college attendance roses, though college graduation rates languished. The upshot is that while the average college graduates in 1970 earned 45 percent more than high school graduates, the differential three decades later exceeds 80 percent.
"In the first half of the century," the authors summarize, "education raced of technology, but later in the century technology raced ahead of educational gains."
Proving that the demand for and supply of educated workers began not in the time of Bill Gates but in the era of Thomas Edison is virtuoso social science. But wasn’t a slowdown in rising educational attainment unavoidable? After all, it’s one thing to increase the average years of schooling by leaps and bounds when most people start near zero, but quite another when national average is already high.
The authors reject the idea that the United States has reached some natural limit in educational advances. Other countries are now at higher levels.
What, then, is holding American youth back?
The authors give a two-part answer. For one thing, the financial aid system is a maze. More important, many people with high school diplomas are not ready for college.
The second problem, the authors write, is concentrated mostly in inner-city schools. Because the poor cannot easily move to better school districts, the authors allow that charter schools as well as vouchers, including those for private school, could be helpful, but more evaluation is necessary.
Data on the effects of preschool are plentiful, and point to large returns on investment, so the authors join the chorus in extolling Head Start, the federal government’s largest preschool program.
Providing more children with a crucial start, along with easier ways to find financial aid, are laudable national objectives. One suspects, though, that the obstacles to getting more young people into and through college have to do with knotty social and cultural issues.
But assume that the author’s policies would raise the national college graduation rate. Would that deeply reduce inequality?
Averages can be deceptive. Most of the gains of the recent flush decades have not gone to the college-educated as a whole. The top 10 or 20 percent by income have education levels roughly equivalent to those in the top 1 percent, but the latter account for much of the boom in inequality. This appears to be related to the way taxed have been cut, and to the ballooning of the financial industry’s share of corporate profits.
It remains to be seen how a reconfigured financial industry and possible new tax policies might affect the 30-year trend toward greater inequality.
In the meantime, it is nice to be reminded, in a data-rich book, that greater investments in human capital once put Americans collectively on top of the world.
What does the author think of the book entitled The Race Between Education and Technology?
选项
A、It is a research on human capital.
B、It is intended for economists.
C、It is a happy fireside read.
D、It is rich in data.
答案
A
解析
通读全文可以看出,文中介绍的这本书主要是对human capital的研究,因此答案为A。也可以使用排除法:本文虽然提到两位作者是经济学家,但是并没有提到这本书的读者群,因此B项不对;在第九段的最后,作者写到“though not always a gripping read”说明这本书并不是那么有趣的、引人入胜的读物,因此C项也不正确;D项说本书“包含大量数据”,虽然是事实,但是不够全面,不能概括作者对本书的看法,因此A项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ECYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
我认为,生活要求人不断地自我调整以适应现实。人愈能及时地进行调整,他的个人世界便愈有意义。调整绝非易事。我曾感到茫然害怕。但我很幸运。父母和老师在我身上发现了某种东西——可以称之为活下去的潜力吧——而我自己却没有发现。他们激励我誓与失明拼搏到底。我必烦学会
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
IftherewasonethingAmericanshadarighttoexpectfromCongress,itwasafederalplantohelptheelderlypayforprescrip
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor
Thetraditionalimageofcavedwellersisprobablyape-likecreaturescladinskimpyanimalskins,completewithclubsandmatte
A、Thenumberofterroristattackslastyearwasmorethan190.B、ColinPowelldidn’ttrustCIAC、Thereportexaggeratedthenumb
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,manyforeignstudentswishtogotothecollegesanduniversitiesin
Mentalhealthprofessionalmaybesurprisedtodiscoverhowmuchishappeningonlinetodayinthehealthcarefield.Workingclos
A、Morethan120.B、About200.C、Twoandonehalfmillion.D、Notmentioned.B
A、150million.B、1.50million.C、15million.D、50million.A
随机试题
对郁证实证的治疗,常采用的治法有
新安装的变压器不需要干燥的条件是变压器注入合格绝缘油后,()。
为了克服投资利润率指标的某些缺陷,应采用()作为投资中心的评价指标。
自然人转让房地产,其转让的房地产坐落地与其居住所在地不一致时,在()税务机关申报缴纳土地增值税。
社会工作者在承担倡导者角色时,应该避免的是()。
若函数f(x)=x3-x在(a,10-a2)上有最小值,则a的取值范围为_________.
动机越强,做事情的效率越高。()
无知∶教育
根据我国宪法的规定,下列说法不正确的是:
一些国际环境组织近年来已改变了保护策略。他们努力拯救整个自然环境,而不是在一段时间内只力图拯救一个物种。许多专家感到在过去15年中,最成功的是世界上几乎所有国家都有了国家动植物保护区和保护公园。这意味着天然的野生生物区将继续供养着许多种相互依存的野生动植物
最新回复
(
0
)