首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Future of Television: What’s on Next? Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinav
The Future of Television: What’s on Next? Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinav
admin
2012-02-02
49
问题
The Future of Television: What’s on Next?
Bosses in the television industry have been keeping a nervous eye on two Scandinavians (斯堪的纳维亚人) with a reputation for causing trouble. In recent years Niklas Zennstrom, a Swede, and Janus Friis, a Dane, have frightened the music industry by inventing KaZaA, a "peer-to-peer" (P2P) file-sharing program that was widely used to download music without paying for it. Then they horrified the mighty telecoms industry by inventing Skype, another P2P program, which lets Internet users make free telephone calls between computers, and very cheap calls to ordinary phones. Their next move was to found yet another start-up — this time, one that threatened to devastate (毁坏) the television industry.
It may do the opposite, as it turns out. The new service, called Joost and now in advanced testing, is based on P2P software that runs on people’s computers, just like Skype and KaZaA. And it does indeed promise to transform the experience of watching television by combining what people like about old-fashioned TV with the exciting possibilities of the Internet. "But unlike KaZaA and Skype," says Fredrik de Wahl, a Swede whom Mr. Zennstrom and Friis have hired as Joost’s boss, "Joost does not disrupt the industry that it is entering. Instead, rather than undercutting television networks and producers, Joost might, as it were, give them new juice."
That is because Mr. de Wahl and his Joost team, working mostly in the Netherlands, have bravely ignored the totems (图腾) of the Internet-video boom. Chief among these fashions is letting users upload anything they want to a video service — which might include clips of themselves doing odd things ("user-generated content") or, more questionably, videos pirated from other sources. The celebrated example of this approach is YouTube, which is now part of Google, the leader in Internet search. Its big problem, however, is that it can be illegal (if copyright is violated) and terribly hard to turn into a business.
On February 2nd Viacom, an American media giant, became the latest company to demand that YouTube remove copyright-infringing (侵犯版权的) clips from its website. YouTube has struck deals with some media firms, including NBC and CBS, to allow their material to appear on its site, and had been trying to thrash out a similar agreement with Viacom. Many observers regard Viacom’s move as a negotiating tactic. But whether YouTube can make money is unclear. Last month Chad Hurley, YouTube’s chief executive, sketched out plans for generating advertising revenues and sharing them with content providers, but so far his firm has none to speak of.
The Innovation of Joost
Joost is also ignoring the two business models seen as the most respectable alternatives to advertising. One is to make users pay for each television show or film they download, but then to let them keep it. This is the tack chosen by Apple, an electronics firm that sells videos on iTunes, its popular online store; by Amazon, the largest online retailer; and by Wal-Mart, the largest traditional retailer, which launched a video-download service this week. The other approach is to let users subscribe to what is, in effect, an all-you-can-eat buffet of videos, and then to "stream" video to their computers without leaving a permanent copy. This is the approach taken by, for instance, Netflix, a Californian firm that mostly delivers DVDs to its subscribers by post, but now also streams films.
The reason that Joost is ignoring all of these methods, says Mr. de Wahl, is that none has much to do with the experience of simply watching TV, which most people enjoy. "Unlike the download or streaming approaches," he says, "TV is not about buying today what you want to watch tomorrow. It’s about turning it on and watching." And in contrast to the "lean-forward" context of "snacking" on a YouTube clip in one’s cubicle while the boss has stepped out, TV is a longer and more relaxed "lean-backward" experience.
Hence Joost’s most shocking innovation, which is not to change the practices that TV adopted decades ago. It will be free, with advertising breaks — no more than three minutes per hour — either before, during or after a show, depending on the market. "Americans," says Mr. de Wahl, "are more tolerant of interruptions."
Joost has "channels", like ordinary TV, but these are now playlists of videos that start whenever it is convenient to the viewer. Viewers can import their instant-messaging buddy lists and chat online with friends while watching the same program. For advertisers, such engagement is worth something, because the activity proves that somebody is watching, rather than being asleep or out of the room. Combined with other information, such as the computer’s IP address and hence its location, advertisers will be able to target their spots much more accurately — all "Desperate Housewives" fans in a particular neighborhood, for example — and thus ought to pay a premium.
The Combination of Television and the Internet
The thing that is missing in this new vision of television, however, is the set itself. Beaming video from a computer to a television is possible: Apple and other firms are starting to sell the necessary gadgets. But until it becomes much easier to connect televisions to the Internet, big media companies are likely to "wait and see" before committing to Joost, says Jeremy Allaire, the boss of Brightcove, a rival Internet-video firm based in Massachusetts. In the meantime, Mr. Allaire thinks, media firms are mainly interested in building their own brands, so Brightcove provides content owners with technology to show television on their own websites, syndicate their shows to other websites, track audiences and collect advertising revenue.
There is, in short, no consensus about the best way to combine television with the Internet. Instead, there are a variety of experiments, of which Joost is the latest example and YouTube the best-known. But with telephony, the Internet is unpicking (拆开) service delivery from network ownership. Joost, YouTube, iTunes and Netflix do not need their own networks to supply their video services: they can rely on fast Internet links provided by others.
According to iSuppli, a market-research firm, Internet downloads will claim more than one-third of the market for on-demand video by 2010. So just as Internet telephony has been bad for traditional phone companies, this "Internet bypass" could be bad for the "on demand" video services being offered by cable-TV and telecoms firms over their networks. But by bringing television to more screens, this could provide new models for program-makers to finance their productions and offer advertisers new ways to reach constraints. And so Joost and rival services could end up rejuvenating (使变得年轻) the 75-year-old medium.
YouTube can hardly generate profit because______.
选项
A、its content can be illegal
B、it is only part of Google
C、it is not well-known enough
D、it sets too many limits to users
答案
A
解析
第三段前面的部分说,互联网视频浪潮中最时尚的就是用户想上传什么就上传什么,不管是不是从别处盗版来的。最后两句说,最著名的例子就是YouTube,它的最大问题就是它可能是非法的,很难当做生意来做(turn into a business)。无法作为生意,当然也就无法赚钱(hardly generate profit),而原因当然就是其内容的非法性,故答案为[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EbE7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Dafterinterviewingbecomecommonpractice【S1】______intheUnitedStates,AmericanjournalistswereteachingEuropea
Dafterinterviewingbecomecommonpractice【S1】______intheUnitedStates,AmericanjournalistswereteachingEuropea
A、Enteringalargecompanywithoutapplication,B、Programminghumanfeelingsintomachines.C、Decidingone’sbestpartnerthroug
Pollution:ALifeandDeathIssueOneofthemainthemesofPlanetunderPressureisthewaymanyoftheEarth’senvironmenta
A、SigourneyWeaver.B、BillMitchell.C、KevinKline.D、IvanReitman.C短文中明确提到KevinKlinegivesadoubleperformanceasDaveandt
A、Sheisagainsttheman’splan.B、Shethinksitneedsalotofmoney.C、Theyneedsometimetothinkaboutit.D、It’sgoodfor
A、Theyarehavingaparty.B、They.areplayingthepiano.C、Someoneelseishavingaparty.D、Someoneelseisfunny.C信息明示题。女士说I
A、EarningaLivingB、CorrectAttitudeonJob-huntingC、HowtoChooseaJob?D、WhatCanaGoodJobOffer?B由选项概括性强可知,本题考查文章主旨或文章标
A、Shemadeareservationforthe9:00flight.B、Shechangedthereservation.C、Shefoundtheywerelateforthe8:00flight.D、S
Whenmostpeoplethinkoftheword"education,"theythinkofapupilasasortofanimate(有生命的)sausagecontainer.Intothis
随机试题
(2018年枣庄市中区)1980年,江西省奉新县边远山村教师奇缺。时年只有十九岁的南昌市进贤县姑娘支月英不顾家人反对,远离家乡,只身来到离家两百多公里、离乡镇45公里、海拔近千米且道路不通的泥洋小学,成了一名深山女教师。一到白洋教学点,她发现这里条件比想
介绍了药物的理化性质和药理作用的是记录药物不良反应的临床表现,临床病例及相关文献的参考书为
肾病综合征最主要的临床特点是
男,28岁。车祸后胸痛、呼吸困难40分钟。曾咳出少量血痰,无恶心、呕吐,无腹胀、腹痛,无意识障碍。查体:P118次/分,R26次/分,BP90/60mmHg。气管右偏,左侧胸壁皮肤淤青,无皮下气肿,左侧4、5、7肋骨触痛明显,可触及骨擦感,左胸叩诊鼓
釉面内墙砖按图案和施釉的特点可分为()等。
2×15年11月1日,甲公司与乙公司签订一项不可撤销的产品销售合同。合同规定:甲公司应于6个月后向乙公司交付A产品100件,每件的不含税售价为3万元。乙公司预付定金50万元,如甲公司违约,甲公司应双倍返还定金。至2×15年末,甲公司已发生成本30万元,因原
[2016年第39题]有专家指出,我国城市规划缺少必要的气象论证,城市的高楼建得高耸而密集,阻碍了城市的通风循环。有关资料显示,近几年国内许多城市的平均风速已下降10%。风速下降,意味着大气扩散能力减弱,导致大气污染物滞留时间延长,易形成雾霾天气和热岛效应
生命权是人的尊严的基础,具有神圣性与不可转让性,不可非法剥夺。下列属于公民的生命权的是()
有以下程序:#include<stdio.h>main(){intm=1,n=2,*p=&m,*q=&n,*r;r=p;p=q;q=r;printf("%d,%d,%d,%d\n",
A、Hefellinatrapmadebyahunter.B、Hehurthisbrainbystayingunderwater.C、Hewasdrownedinanicyriver.D、Hewastrap
最新回复
(
0
)