首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2011-02-28
66
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2 ) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every.500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare— but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world, "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple."
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from? doomsday (毁灭性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article.
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属细节性问题。文章的最后一段,是人们对这个问题的看法,因此读完这一段后,对比四个选项,看哪一个和文章的内容更加符合。首先,我们可以排除A选项It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem。在文章中并没有提及;B选项It may create more problems than it might solve。和原文最后的叙述很接近,是一个正确的选项;我们再看一下D选项Further research should be done before
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ectd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefits.Inrecentyears,scientistshavebeguntoshowthat
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
SusanBaronessGreenfieldisaBritishinstitution.Inacountrythatperceivesitsscientistsaswhite-coatedeccentrics,andp
Unlesswespendmoneytospotandpreventasteroids(小行星)now,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknowit,sayso
Dogsaresocialanimalsandwithoutpropertraining,theywillbehavelikewildanimals.Theywillspoilyourhouse,destroyyou
Whydidthewomantalktotheprofessor?
Apersonmayhaveanideaabouthimselfthatwillpreventhimfromdoinggoodwork.Hemayhavetheideathatheisnotcapable
Supposethatyouareaprofessorofmusicinaconservatoire.YourstudentXiaoLiasksyoutorecommendhertoteachinacolle
随机试题
患者久病肾阴不足,虚火扰动阴血,症见尿色淡红,尿痛涩滞不显著,腰膝酸软,神疲乏力者,首选方剂是
异常支气管呼吸音可见于肺内空洞,最常见于下列疾病的有
产后腹痛之气血两虚证主要证候不包括
服用弱酸性药物碱化尿液后,将会使药物的排泄()。
关于宪法的历史发展,下列哪一选项是不正确的?(2014年卷一第21题)
建设项目环境风险分析中,泄漏液体的蒸发总量应包括()。
甲于3月1日向乙发出一要约,后反悔,遂于3月3日发出该要约作废的通知。要约于3月5日至乙处,但乙外出未能拆阅。作废通知于3月6日到达乙处,乙于3月7日返回家中。则此要约()。
被称为中国传统工艺“三绝”的是江西景德镇瓷器、福建脱胎漆器、北京景泰蓝。
[*]
在(19)中,用户一般不直接操纵计算机,而是将作业提交给系统操作员。由操作员将作业成批装入计算机,然后由操作系统按照一定的原则执行作业,并输出结果,最后由操作员将作业运行结果交给用户。
最新回复
(
0
)