首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2011-02-28
37
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2 ) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every.500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare— but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world, "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple."
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from? doomsday (毁灭性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article.
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属细节性问题。文章的最后一段,是人们对这个问题的看法,因此读完这一段后,对比四个选项,看哪一个和文章的内容更加符合。首先,我们可以排除A选项It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem。在文章中并没有提及;B选项It may create more problems than it might solve。和原文最后的叙述很接近,是一个正确的选项;我们再看一下D选项Further research should be done before
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ectd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefits.Inrecentyears,scientistshavebeguntoshowthat
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefits.Inrecentyears,scientistshavebeguntoshowthat
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Accordingtothespeaker,whatshouldthelistenersdoassoonaspossible?
WhatdidtheprofessorwanttotalktoAnnabout?
Whydoesthewomantalktotheprofessor?
Unlesswespendmoneytospotandpreventasteroids(小行星)now,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknowit,sayso
随机试题
义务教育是基础教育,是现代文明的重要标志。()
生理所说的体温是指【】
女,40岁。下腹坠胀1年余,性交后阴道流血半月。妇科检查:宫颈中度糜烂,颗粒状,有少量接触性出血,子宫正常大小,双附件区未见异常。假设宫颈刮片细胞学检查为巴氏Ⅱ级,下述哪一种治疗方法疗效较好、疗程最短
根尖周病治疗原则应是
患者右上中切牙扭转近90°角,且伴有唇侧倾斜,牙髓正常,牙根长、粗大,牙槽骨轻度吸收,牙龈红肿,探易出血。如果选择桩冠修复,则根管治疗后开始桩冠修复的最早时间是()
维修性设计指产品设计时,设计师应从维修的观点出发,保证当产品一旦出故障,能容易地发现故障,易拆、易检修、易安装,即可维修度要高。下列各项中属于产品结构的维修性设计的可达性设计的是()。
爆炸石方遇有瞎炮,应在距离原炮眼()cm的地方另行打眼放炮。
Wherearethey?
•Readthearticlebelow.•Inmostofthelines34—45thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyincorrectordoesnotf
A、Shequestionstheman’spurpose.B、Shedoesn’tlikeparties.C、Sheisfullyengaged.D、Shehasaninvitationalready.C男士建议聚会,
最新回复
(
0
)