首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2011-02-28
41
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2 ) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every.500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare— but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world, "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple."
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from? doomsday (毁灭性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article.
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属细节性问题。文章的最后一段,是人们对这个问题的看法,因此读完这一段后,对比四个选项,看哪一个和文章的内容更加符合。首先,我们可以排除A选项It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem。在文章中并没有提及;B选项It may create more problems than it might solve。和原文最后的叙述很接近,是一个正确的选项;我们再看一下D选项Further research should be done before
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ectd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedNations,notoriousforendlessdeliberations,istryingatechnologicalquickfix.ItsGlobalCompactOffice,whichp
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
Whatdoesthespeakerwarnthestudentsagainstdoing?
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefits.Inrecentyears,scientistshavebeguntoshowthat
WhatdoesthespeakersayabouttheroadbetweenMaineandQuebec?
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
WhatdidtheprofessorwanttotalktoAnnabout?
Unlesswespendmoneytospotandpreventasteroids(小行星)now,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknowit,sayso
Supposethatyouareaprofessorofmusicinaconservatoire.YourstudentXiaoLiasksyoutorecommendhertoteachinacolle
随机试题
计算机网络是计算机技术和()的结合。
患者,男性,39岁,平素吸烟,喘咳痰多。与人争吵后,突然昏厥,喉中痰鸣,舌苔白腻,脉沉滑。治法是
患者男性,35岁。突发胸闷,憋气,端坐呼吸,病情渐进性加重并出现发绀,X线示胸膜腔大量积气、肺萎陷。抽气后好转,但不久又加重,最大可能诊断是
A.卵泡刺激素B.黄体生成激素C.雌激素D.孕激素E.泌乳素
初孕妇。32岁。妊娠39周,剧烈持续腹痛4小时入院。查体:贫血貌,血压100/70mmHg,脉搏120次/分,子宫硬,宫缩间歇不松弛,有局限性压痛,胎位不清,胎心110次/分,阴道少量流血,宫口未开。为明确诊断首选的辅助检查是
用于连接距离较大且有角度变化的两轴,宜采用()联轴器。
根据我国立法法的规定,下列哪一项属于地方性法规可以规定的事项?()
某土著人为提高后代的战斗力,对新生婴儿进行身体素质测试。他们把初生的婴儿放在恶劣的自然环境中检验其生命力的强弱。抛弃那些病弱的、经不起考验的婴儿,留下那些健壮的婴儿。这一方法并没有使当地的土著人强盛,反而衰落了。以下哪项最适合作为当地土著人选拔人才
Incommonwithmanycountries,Britainhasseriousenvironmentalproblems.In1952,morethan4,000peoplediedinLondonbecaus
Thestatistics______thatlivingstandardsintheareahaveimproveddrasticallyinrecenttimes.
最新回复
(
0
)