首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2011-02-28
45
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2 ) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every.500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare— but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world, "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple."
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from? doomsday (毁灭性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article.
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属细节性问题。文章的最后一段,是人们对这个问题的看法,因此读完这一段后,对比四个选项,看哪一个和文章的内容更加符合。首先,我们可以排除A选项It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem。在文章中并没有提及;B选项It may create more problems than it might solve。和原文最后的叙述很接近,是一个正确的选项;我们再看一下D选项Further research should be done before
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ectd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Accordingtothespeaker,whatshouldthelistenersdoassoonaspossible?
Whatarethetwospeakerstalkingabout?
Whatarethetwospeakerstalkingabout?
SusanBaronessGreenfieldisaBritishinstitution.Inacountrythatperceivesitsscientistsaswhite-coatedeccentrics,andp
Unlesswespendmoneytospotandpreventasteroids(小行星)now,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknowit,sayso
Dogsaresocialanimalsandwithoutpropertraining,theywillbehavelikewildanimals.Theywillspoilyourhouse,destroyyou
随机试题
Whenhearrived,hefound______theagedandthesickathome.
下列关于给药原则的描述,错误的一项是
根据《环境影响评价技术导则—总纲》,关于公众参与的要求、对象、形式,下列说法错误的有()。
属于名城整体空间环境保护方法的是()。
根据我国现行建筑安装工程费用项目组成的规定,下列应计入措施费的是( )。
在幼儿园科学发现室的“磁铁”区域中,孩子们拿着磁铁一会儿吸这个,一会儿吸那个,同伴之间还隔着玻璃赛车。请你设计一节以“磁铁的秘密”为主题的科学探究活动,让幼儿通过游戏、操作、探索等活动来感知磁铁吸铁的特性、磁性的穿透性及穿透性与磁性大小的关系。
“一国两制”的前提是()。
阅读以下文字,完成46-50题核电站的一次性投资确实比火电站大一些。衡量电站的经济价值,还要核算电站运行后消耗的燃料、设备折旧、()、运行管理等费用。30年来,国际上对煤电成本与核电成本所作的等值比较,显示出修火电站实际出现的低投入经济效应的负走
实践活动是以改造客观世界为目的、主体与客体之间通过一定的中介发生相互作用的过程,其中
C语言程序的模块化通过以下哪个选项来实现
最新回复
(
0
)