首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2011-02-28
53
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2 ) How bad the consequences if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every.500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare— but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world, "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple."
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from? doomsday (毁灭性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article.
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the course of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属细节性问题。文章的最后一段,是人们对这个问题的看法,因此读完这一段后,对比四个选项,看哪一个和文章的内容更加符合。首先,我们可以排除A选项It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem。在文章中并没有提及;B选项It may create more problems than it might solve。和原文最后的叙述很接近,是一个正确的选项;我们再看一下D选项Further research should be done before
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ectd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
TheUnitedStatesleadsallindustrialnationsintheproportionofitsyoungmenandwomenwhoreceivehighereducation.Whyis
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Accordingtothespeaker,whatshouldthelistenersdoassoonaspossible?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatshouldthelistenersdoassoonaspossible?
SusanBaronessGreenfieldisaBritishinstitution.Inacountrythatperceivesitsscientistsaswhite-coatedeccentrics,andp
Accordingtothespeaker,whywerelogcabinsespeciallypopularwithsettlerswhomovedwest?
Whydoesthewomantalktotheprofessor?
Whydidthewomantalktotheprofessor?
随机试题
TheU.S.dollarwassupposedtobeattheendofitsrope.Kickingthebucket.Well,maybenot.Thedollarcontinuesto【C1】_____
菌痢病人,腹泻2天,每日10次,脓血便伴发热。查体:BP11/9kPa(83/68mmHg),P100次/分。皮肤凉。苍白。应诊断为
骨折线横过鼻背、眶部后经颧骨上方达翼突的上颌骨折称为
下列关于中枢免疫器官的叙述,不正确的是
甲公司与乙公司签订了加工承揽合同,甲公司为乙公司加工一套机器设备,如果合同中规定乙公司付款的当日甲公司将设备交付给乙公司,乙公司不按照合同约定支付价款,甲公司拒绝将设备交付给乙公司,设备因意外事故毁损,以下说法正确的是()
山海关素有“大漠雄关”之称,是扼住河西走廊通道的重要关隘。()
课程实施是指通过一系列的教学活动,将已经编定好的课程付诸实践。课程实施的过程不包括()。
随着“二胎”政策的实施,短期会扩大母婴食品、玩具等行业的市场需求,长期还将带动医疗、教育等行业的发展。由此可见:
设平面区域D={(x,y)|x2+y2≤1,y≥0},D1={(x,y)|x2+y2≤1,x≥0,y≥0),则().
下列关于线性表的叙述中,不正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)