首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
admin
2017-03-15
82
问题
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebrated and seasoned, he was thus a natural choice to serve on an independent "commission on growth" announced last month by the World Bank. (The commission will weigh and sift what is known about growth, and what might be done to boost it.)
Natural, that is, except for anyone who takes his 1956 contribution literally. For, according to the model he laid out in that article, the efforts of policymakers to raise the rate of growth per head are ultimately futile.
A government eager to force the pace of economic advance may be tempted by savings drives, tax cuts, investment subsidies or even population controls. As a result of these measures, each member of the labour force may enjoy more capital to work with. But this process of "capital deepening", as economists call it, eventually runs into diminishing returns. Giving a worker a second computer does not double his output.
Accumulation alone cannot yield lasting progress, Mr. Solow showed. What can? Anything that allows the economy to add to its output without necessarily adding more labour and capital. Mr. Solow labeled this font of wealth "technological progress" in 1956, and measured its importance in 1957. But in neither paper did he explain where it came from or how it could be accelerated. Invention, innovation and ingenuity were all "exogenous" influences, lying outside the remit of his theory. To practical men of action, Mr. Solow’s model was thus an impossible tease: what it illuminated did not ultimately matter; and what really mattered, it did little to illuminate.
The law of diminishing returns holds great sway over the economic imagination. But its writ has not gone unchallenged. A fascinating new book, Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations by David Warsh, tells the story of the rebel economics of increasing returns. A veteran observer of dismal scientists at work, first at the Boston Globe and now in an online column called Economic Principals, Mr. Warsh has written the best book of its kind since Peter Bernstein’s Capital Ideas.
Diminishing returns ensure that firms cannot grow too big, preserving competition between them. This, in turn, allows the invisible hand of the market to perform its magic. But, as Mr. Warsh makes clear, the fealty economists show to this principle is as much mathematical as philosophical. The topology of diminishing returns is easy for economists to navigate: a landscape of declining gradients and single peaks, free of the treacherous craters and crevasses that might otherwise entrap them.
The hero of the second half of Mr. Warsh’s book is Paul Romer, of Stanford University, who took up the challenge ducked by Mr. Solow. If technological progress dictates economic growth, what kind of economics governs technological advance? In a series of papers, culminating in an article in the Journal of Political Economy in 1990, Mr. Romer tried to make technology "endogenous", to explain it within the terms of his model. In doing so, he steered growth theory out of the comfortable cul-de-sac in which Mr. Solow had so neatly parked it.
The escape required a three-point turn. First, Mr. Romer assumed that ideas were goods—of a particular kind. Ideas, unlike things, are "non-rival": Everyone can make use of a single design, recipe or blueprint at the same time. This turn in the argument led to a second: the fabrication of ideas enjoys increasing returns to scale. Expensive to produce, they are cheap, almost costless, to reproduce. Thus the total cost of a design does not change much, whether it is used by one person or by a million.
Blessed with increasing returns, the manufacture of ideas might seem like a good business to go into. Actually, the opposite is true. If the business is free to enter, it is not worth doing so, because competition pares the price of a design down to the negligible cost of reproducing it.
Unless idea factories can enjoy some measure of monopoly over their designs—by patenting them, copyrighting them, or just keeping them secret—they will not be able to cover the fixed cost of inventing them. That was the final turn in Mr. Romer’s new theory of growth.
How much guidance do these theories offer to policymakers, such as those sitting on the World Bank’s commission? In Mr. Solow’s model, according to a common caricature, technology falls like "manna from heaven", leaving the bank’s commissioners with little to do but pray. Mr. Romer’s theory, by contrast, calls for a more worldly response: educate people, subsidies their research, import ideas from abroad, carefully gauge the protection offered to intellectual property.
But did policymakers need Mr. Romer’s model to reveal the importance of such things? Mr. Solow has expressed doubts. Despite the caricature, he did not intend in his 1956 model to deny that innovation is often dearly bought and profit-driven. The question is whether anything useful can be said about that process at the level of the economy as a whole. That question has yet to be answered definitively. In particular, Mr. Solow worries that some of the "more powerful conclusions" of the new growth theory are unearned, flowing as they do from powerful assumptions.
At one point in Mr. Warsh’s book, Mr. Romer is quoted comparing the building of economic models to writing poetry. It is a triumph of form as much as content. This creative economist did not discover anything new about the world with his 1990 paper on growth. Rather, he extended the metre and rhyme-scheme of economics to capture a world—the knowledge economy—expressed until then only in the loosest kind of doggerel. That is how economics makes progress. Sadly, it does not, in and of itself, help economies make progress.
The sentence "Giving a worker a second computer does not double his output." (Para. 3) can be best interpreted as______.
选项
A、the measures adopted by the government are not effective at all
B、having more capital to work with is not necessarily effective
C、workers needs more than computers to achieve productivity
D、capital deepening leads to efficiency
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EuSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
WhenFacebooksaiditwouldstartadatingserviceinColombiainSeptember,ErikaRamossignedup.Single,35,livinginBo
TodayitscrimerateismorethantwiceofJohannesburgandhigherthaninanylargecityoutsidetheAmericas.
Howmuchphysicalactivityshouldteenagersdo,andhowcantheygetenough?Manyteenagersspendalotoftimebeingsedent
尊敬的各位嘉宾,女士们,先生们,朋友们:我代表中国政府,对莅临会议的东盟国家领导人和各位嘉宾表示热烈的欢迎!中国与东盟各国政府高度重视发展友好关系和互利合作。自2004年首次举办中国—东盟博览会和商务与投资峰会以来,双方积极推进中国—东盟自由贸易
A、Solarenergy.B、Fossilfuels.C、Newnuclearplants.D、Nonuclearplants.C根据原文第二段,核问题涉及能源安全和气候变化的问题。前者反对关闭核电站,并且支持开新型核电站,因为废除核
A、China.B、TheUnitedStates.C、Japan.D、SouthAfrica.C根据原文第一段最后一句话,可知赞成核电站建设的国家有中国、南非和(美国的)布什政府,由此可推断,正确的选项只能是日本,因为该国未包括在上述国家中
StevenAveryfaceslifeimprisonforarapeofayoungwoman18yearsago.
科学家声称,动物,包括人类,生命可以延长五倍。如果这一理论是正确的,未来人类预期寿命可达150年。关键词汇:claim:声称;normalperiod:正常成长期;life-span:寿命。这句话的难点就是把这些词翻译出来。
Peoplevaluemoneydesperatelybecausetheyvalueoneanotherdesperately;thusthecauseofpanicinthestock-marketplungeis
今晚我要祝福你的俱乐部生日快乐。现在,我自己已经到达生命中的一个阶段,在这个阶段里我记住的是我的生日而不是我几岁了。我想我已经到了所谓的中年。这个阶段,我们往往摄人对我们有益的食物,而不是我们喜欢的食物。我为你们的俱乐部感到自豪,因为它是为我们上了年纪的人
随机试题
下列费用中不属于社会保障费的是()。
关于所有者权益的表述,正确的是()。Ⅰ.又称为股东权益或者净资产Ⅱ.是企业总资产扣除负债后余下的部分Ⅲ.等于股本(实收资本)、资本公积、未分配利润三项之和Ⅳ.表示企业的资产净值
以下各项属于事业单位专用基金核算内容的有()。
集装箱货物有哪两种集散方式?
再造想象
打击犯罪是公安机关执法思想的核心。()
Theonsetofanewgenerationofcomputerattackswasmarkedby______.Thistextismostprobablytakenfrom______.
某软件公司项目A的利润分析如下表所示。设贴现率为10%,第二年的利润挣现值是(9)元。
Istestanxietydestructive?Canwemaketestanxietyworkforus?Theanswertobothofthesequestionsisyes.Testanxietyof
InNewJersey,highschoolradioepitomizeswhatischaracteristicnationwide.WCVH,outofHunterdonCentralHighSchool,celeb
最新回复
(
0
)