The sense of honour appears to be dying. Who fights duels to defend his reputation anymore? The idea merely strikes us as odd. H

admin2010-07-19  29

问题    The sense of honour appears to be dying. Who fights duels to defend his reputation anymore? The idea merely strikes us as odd. How often does someone resign public office as a form of protest against his government’s policies about this or that? Most of us submerge our consciences in the policies of our company or organisation (and in our own self-interest) and regard loyalty as more important than dishonour.
   We had an honour code when I went to college; that was in the late 1950s. During exams no one monitored you: instructors came in, handed out the blue books, handed out the exams, and left. During the four years I was there, I can recall only one case of cheating. Students simply did not break the code.
   In World War Il men died more or less willingly for the nation and the nation’s honour, and they were honoured for it in return. Now we have become cynical about such things; the nation lies, fights unjustifiable wars; the nation robs the poor to give to the rich.
   At my college the students used to agree to inform on their friends rather than suffer a breach in the honour code.  A sense of honour is a sense that there are standards of behaviour one must live up to, even at the cost of one’s personal happiness, even at the cost of one’s life. Without such a sense one has to make up one’s rights and wrongs as one goes along--usually, as it happens, to one’s own advantage. Morality thereby becomes a matter of expedience: nothing seems worth dying for, and life loses its beauty and some of its value.
   Our recent history has deprived us of models. I cherish the story of John Stubbs, a Puritan divine of Queen Elizabeth’s time who strongly opposed her projected marriage to the Duke of Alencon. Stubbs knew the penalty for doing so, which was the loss of a hand; nevertheless, he published a pamphlet against, the marriage.  He was accordingly tried, convicted, and led out for public execution of the sentence. Stubbs laid his right hand on the block, the ax fell, and he rose to his feet, lifted the bloody stump high in the air, and cried out to the crowd, "Long live the queen!"
   In spite of the blood and the horror, it is the beauty of such an act that stands out. A man lives up to his beliefs; he acts with courage and great style and literally gives himself in the service of something he feels is greater than himself. We cannot help but honour him, whether we agree with his beliefs or not
Which is NOT true as far as the author’s college life was concerned?

选项 A、Few students cheated on exams.
B、Students had an honour code.
C、Students did not tell teachers about their friends’ cheating.
D、Teachers did not supervise exams.

答案C

解析 根据第二段,A、B、D都成立,而第四段第一句说:当时的大学生往往宁愿揭发朋友也不愿违背荣誉守则,这与C矛盾,所以正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/F5lO777K
0

最新回复(0)