首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. •For each ques
admin
2010-01-28
38
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
What is created by both a competent first offer/demand and "primacy" in a courtroom trial?
选项
A、The perception of others.
B、A reactive mode.
C、A confrontational event.
D、A psychological advantage.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/F8Kd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 ATakethenumber14busadvisesthequestionercorrectly.Choice(B)usesthepasttense.Choice(C)confus
Howlongdoestheprocessofinternationalshippingdocumentstake?
Whyisthewomanmakingacall?
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
SaleReductionYourcompanyisaninternationalcompanywhichproduceselectronicproductS.Yourcompany’ssaleshavered
1.Practiseansweringthesequestions.PhaseOne:•Canyoutellmeaboutyourpresentjobandyourplansforthefuture?•Can
Askingquestions征询
Makingcounter-proposals提出反提案
Makingashortspeech
CooperationforaNewBusinessYourcompanyisinternationalandveryfamousforchocolates.TheCEOofanotherfamouscompanyw
随机试题
血浆鱼精蛋白副凝试验阳性说明
A.曲格列酮B.二甲双胍C.阿卡波糖D.格列苯脲E.依克那肽改善胰岛β细胞功能,主要用于治疗胰岛素抵抗和2型糖尿病
诉讼时效的种类包括( )。
财政实施资源配置的范围包括()。
在我国,汉族信教群体主要信仰佛教、道教和基督教。()
如图所示,平行导体滑轨MMˊ、NNˊ水平放置,固定在匀强磁场中。磁场的方向与水平面垂直向下,滑杆AB、CD横放其上静止,形成一个闭合电路,当AB向右滑动时,电路中感应电流的方向及滑杆CD受到的磁场力的方向分别为()。
董某、陈某都和周某有仇,都伺机杀周某。一天董某在周某的饭里放了老鼠药,按其投入的分量,不足以致周某死亡。恰在董某下毒后一会儿,陈某也在周某的同一饭碗里投下了砒霜,按其分量也不足以致周某死亡,但他们各自下毒的分量加在一起,导致了周某的死亡。下列关于董某、陈某
设X1与X2相互独立,且均服从N(0,1),=1/2(X1+X2),U=,V=X2-,则U与V()
网络存储备份系统的设计目标是什么?
下列给定程序中,函数proc()的功能是:首先把b所指字符串中的字符按逆序存放,然后将str1所指字符串中的字符和str2所指字符串中的字符,按排列的顺序交叉合并到str所指数组中,过长的剩余字符接在str所指数组的尾部。例如,当str1所指字符串中的内容
最新回复
(
0
)