首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You’d think that if the San Andreas Fault went to the trouble of having a perfectly good earthquake, the folks on the US West Co
You’d think that if the San Andreas Fault went to the trouble of having a perfectly good earthquake, the folks on the US West Co
admin
2012-01-21
51
问题
You’d think that if the San Andreas Fault went to the trouble of having a perfectly good earthquake, the folks on the US West Coast might at least notice. A new study reveals, however, that in 1992, what should have been a China-smashing 4.8 Richter-scale quake hit central California, and yet nobody felt a thing. The explanation for the odd shadow-quake was published last week in the journal Nature and may help improve science’s understanding of earthquakes in general.
According to Alan T. Linda, a geophysicist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and the study’s leader, what makes seismic events so destructive is not just that the earth moves but the speed with which it does so. In many quakes the earth’s surface movement that leads to shaking takes only seconds to unfold, sending energy exploding in all directions. But recent analysis of data from strain gauges along the San Andreas Fault reveals that four years ago, a skip occurred that took a week to play out. Such slow sliding almost eliminates an earthquake’s quaking.
Exactly what determines the speed with which the earth’s plates move is unclear, but scientists have some ideas. "The fault material may play a role," Linda says, "Rock with holes containing water can move more smoothly than other rock. The pressure the plates are under can make a difference too: the bigher the stress, the likelier the fault will fail suddenly."
Linda’s work may never help seismologists determine which type of temblor is likely to strike which region, but he still believes the research has value. There may be no better way of understanding destructive quakes, he feels, than to learn what makes them less destructive.
According to Linda, what makes seismic events so destructive is ______.
选项
A、the earth movement
B、the energy explosion
C、the speed of the earth movements
D、the earthquake
答案
C
解析
第二段“According to Alan T.Linda,a geophysicist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and the study’s leader,what makes seismic events so destructive is not just that the earth moves but the speed with which it does so.”说明Linda认为地震具有破坏性是因为速度。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FhXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
A.EducationB.PeopleC.TransportD.DrinksE.FoodF.Nightlife*
ThepassagetellsusthatasachildgrowsupAccordingtothepassage,theabilitiesachildhasinheritedfromhisparents
FamilyHistoryInanagewhentechnologyisdevelopingfasterthaneverbefore,manypeoplearebeingattractedtothe【C1】__
TheOldGateIntheMiddleAgesthevastmajorityofEuropeancitieshadwallsaroundthem.Thiswaspartlyfordefensive【C1
USBlacksHard-hitbyCancerDeathratesforcancerarefallingforallAmericans,butblackAmericansarestillmorelikely
Themainideaofthepassageisabout______.Theword"desalination"inthelastsentencemaymean______.
Marriedmotherswhoalsoholdjobs,despitehavingtojugglecareerandhome,enjoy(31)healththantheirunderemployedorchil
WherewouldhestayafterhisscholarshipyearinLondonwasover?
WherewouldhestayafterhisscholarshipyearinLondonwasover?
随机试题
学生的记录由学号和成绩组成,N名学生的数据已在主函数中放入结构体数组s中,请编写函数fun(),它的功能是:把低于平均分的学生数据放在b所指的数组中,低于平均分的学生人数通过形参n传回,平均分通过函数值返回。注意:部分源程序给出如下。请勿改
2006年3月,20岁的刘灿在河东宾馆招聘中,经考核被录用为服务员,宾馆与刘灿签订了为期5年的劳动合同。合同条款之一是:“因宾馆服务业的特殊要求,凡被录用为本宾馆服务员的,不经公司批准在合同期内不得结婚,否则,宾馆有权提前解除合同。”刘灿在合同签字时,对该
要想在Word2010中创建表格,以下哪些是正确的方法()
风心病主动脉瓣狭窄可引起
买方甲公司与卖方乙公司签订的供货合同中约定,乙公司将甲公司所购买的部分货物直接运至丙公司。则下列表述中,不正确的是()。
ETF联接基金投资于目标ETF的资产不得低于联接基金资产净值的()。
你和单位小王去基层单位调查科技信息问题。由于小王说了一些不当的话。造成基层单位不配合你们的工作,对此,你怎么办?
商品标价是货币执行价值尺度职能的重要体现,也就是说商品标价表现着商品的内在价值。在普通商品中某商品的标价为8元,而完全相同的该商品在高档商场的标价为14元。这表明()。
资本主义经济危机的实质是()
Wemaylookattheworldaroundus,butsomehowwemanagenottoseeituntilwhateverwe’vebecomeusedtosuddenlydisappears.
最新回复
(
0
)