首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. T
admin
2023-01-17
30
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animal. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and… find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals. Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry—making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature—
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows—as if we needed reminding—that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
The purpose of this article is to________.
选项
A、report recent advances in the use of antibiotics
B、provide empirical evidence for microbiologists
C、describe threats of antibiotics to human health
D、contribute to settle an ongoing debate on antibiotics
答案
D
解析
文章第一段提出学者建议养殖业最好不要使用抗生素催肥牲畜,而农民对此持不同意见。然后作者说“有实证实验所得的数据可以解决该冲突”,进而列举丹麦的例子后在最后一句说“在不损害农民利益的前提下是可以保护人类健康的”,由此可知D项“解决同绕抗生素的争论”正确。其他选项在文章虽有体现,但并非作者的写作目的,均可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FjcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
Americahaslongbeenresistanttoadequatepovertypoliciesbecauseofitsstrongstrainofthinkingthatthepoorareresponsi
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
It’sdifficulttoimagineaworldwithoutantibiotics.Theycurediseasesthatkilledourancestorsincrowds,andenableanynu
随机试题
项目施工危险源辨识常采用()方法。
硬化混凝土的弹性模量受骨料弹性模量影响最大,()。
货币市场与股票市场的一个主要区别是()。
可以依法征收房地产的主体是()。
甲旅行社与乙旅行社在旅行合同中都没有按照合同约定履行义务,对此,()违约责任。
认为学习的实质就是观察的心理学家是()。
树根对于()相当于树对于()
在考生文件夹下完成如下简单应用。1.打开表单myform4-4,把表单(名称为Forml)标题改为“欢迎您”,将文本“欢迎您访问系统”(名称为Labell的标签)改为25号黑体。最后在表单上添加“关闭”(名称为Commandl)命令按钮,单击此按
A、$1,800,000,000.B、$18,000,000.C、$80,000,000,000.D、$80,000,000.A
A、148billion.B、140million.C、1480million.A文中明确告知每年因官员腐败而损失的国家资金为1480亿美元,考察考生对数字识别的敏感度。PresidentObasanjo尼日利亚总统奥巴桑乔。
最新回复
(
0
)