2. 考研
  3. In 2004 Google unveiled Gmail: a powerful e-mail account with a gigabyte of storage. That was 500 times what Hotmail was offerin

In 2004 Google unveiled Gmail: a powerful e-mail account with a gigabyte of storage. That was 500 times what Hotmail was offerin

admin2014-06-25  31
问题     In 2004 Google unveiled Gmail: a powerful e-mail account with a gigabyte of storage. That was 500 times what Hotmail was offering—so much storage, the original Gmail didn’t even offer a delete button— and all for free. But not everyone rejoiced. Gmail paid for all of this goodness by displaying small text ads, off to the right of each incoming message, relevant to its contents. Privacy advocates went ballistic. It didn’t seem to matter to them that a software algorithm—not a human being -was scanning your messages for keywords. The Electronic Privacy Information Center called for Gmail to be shut down, and a California state senator proposed a bill that would make it illegal to scan the contents of incoming e-mail.
    To many people, it seems that the more time we spend online, the more often we are offered convenience in exchange for our privacy. Grocery stores’ affinity cards give us discounts—but let them track what we are buying and eating. Amazon, com greets us by name and remembers what we have bought. Facebook has amassed the largest database of personal information in human history(more than half a billion people).
    Of course, convenience-for-privacy deals have been going on for years. Credit cards leave a trail. Phones give phone company employees a record of who you’ve been calling. It’s nice to have a house to live in but buying one leaves a permanent record of your whereabouts.
    There are some good reasons to protect certain aspects of our privacy, of course. We would never want our medical or financial details to keep us from getting a job—or a date. We might not want our voting patterns made public. But beyond those obvious exceptions, privacy fears have always been more of an emotional reaction than a rational one.(Does anyone really care what groceries you buy? Does it matter if they do?)And in the online world, much of it is simply fear of the unknown, of what’s new.
    In time, as the unknown becomes familiar, each new wave of online-privacy terror seems to fade a-way. Nobody bats an eye over Gmail’s ad-scanning feature anymore. Even middle-agers and grandparents are signing up for Facebook. The younger generation can’t even comprehend why their elders worry about privacy. Indeed, the entire appeal of the new age of online services is to broadcast personal information. On purpose. Foursquare, Gowalla and Facebook Places even publicize your current location, so that your friends can track your movements(and, of course, join you).
    If you were among those who thought that Google overstepped privacy lines with Gmail, you must be positively freaked about these developments. But at least some aspects of your privacy have been gone for years. The fear you feel may be real, but the chances of someone actually looking up the boring details of your life are reassuringly small. As with fear of flying, shark attacks or lightning, your gut may not be getting realistic data from your brain.
Which of the following is closest to the meaning of this text?
选项 A、The fear of ill exceeds the ills we fear.
B、Caution is the parent of safety.
C、Do not wash your dirty linen in public.
D、All news has wings.
答案A
解析 本文前两段指出了人们对网络隐私的担忧。第三、四段作者指出：用隐私换取便利的交易早已有之，除某些特例之外，人们对网络隐私的担忧并非理智的反应，而更多的是对新生事物的恐惧。第五段作者以Gmail等目前在大众中赢得的普遍认可证明：网络隐私泄露并非想象中那么可怕，随着人们的日趋理智，他们会逐渐抛弃对网络隐私的担忧。第六段总结全文指出：人们不必担心信息安全的问题，因为很少有人会对你的那些无聊的个人信息感兴趣。可见，本文旨在告诉人们“无需担忧网络隐私泄露问题”，[A]选项符合文义。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GGK4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)