首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
admin
2012-07-06
29
问题
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing. Not everyone is impressed. I recently interviewed a professor of education who is an expert in policy evaluation. She lamented the fact that politicians tend to get their facts from popular social science books containing inaccuracies.
I think the professor was right to worry about ministerial exposure to authors such as Malcolm Gladwell, Dan Ariely and even Tim Harford— but not for quite the right reasons. The problem is not that such authors are inaccurate. I’m not sure that they are. Gladwell has plenty of critics, but I find him a careful reporter. And I am told Tim Harford is all but infallible.
Yet infallibility is not enough. It’s perfectly possible for an author to do nothing but weave together credible, peer-reviewed research and yet produce a highly partial view of reality. Different pieces of research invariably point in different directions. Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational is full of examples of irrational behaviour. My own Logic of Life is full of examples of rational behaviour. Occasionally I am asked to explain the contradiction, but if there is a contradiction, it is a subtle one.
If Ariely describes a rainy day and I describe a sunny one, we are not really contradicting each other. We each offer our spin, but it’s really about whether most people expect sunshine or rain: Dan says that it’s rainier than we tend to think, while I say the sun shines more often than anyone would credit. A serious review of this metaphorical evidence would count up the rainy days and the sunny ones.
For real policy questions, such reviews exist. They are called systemic reviews. They should be the first port of call for anyone wanting to understand what works. But they are not exactly bestsellers in airport bookshops.
Quite apart from the fact that nobody wants to read all the evidence, there is a deep problem with the way evidence is selected throughout academia. Even a studiously impartial literature review will be biased towards published results. Many findings are never published because they just aren’t very intriguing. Alas, boring or disappointing evidence is still evidence. It is dangerous to discard it, but let’s not blame Malcolm Gladwell just because he doesn’t stick it on page one.
There’s a hierarchy of evidence here. The systemic review tries to track down unpublished research as well as what makes it into the journals. A less careful review will often be biased towards results that are interesting. A peer-reviewed article presents a single result, while a popular social-science book will highlight a series of results that tell a tale. The final selection mechanism is the reader, who will half-remember some findings and forget the rest.
Those of us who tell ourselves we are curious about the world are actually swimming in "evidence" that has been filtered again and again in favour of interestingness. It’s a heady and perhaps toxic drink, but we shouldn’t blame popularisers alone for our choice to dive in. [515 words]
Predictably Irrational and Logic of Life are mentioned to show that______.
选项
A、nearly all the peer-reviewed researches are partial reviews of reality
B、two seemingly contradictory ideas can be in fact consistent with each other
C、the combination of two partial views can form a systemic one
D、the synthesis of accurate evidences may be a partial view of reality
答案
D
解析
本题考查写作目的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Hcp4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithotheraspectsofculture.ThinkofGalileo’s17thcenturytrialforhisrebelli
ItcanbeinferredfromParagraph1thatoneimportantfactorintheincreasingimportanceofeducationintheUnitedStateswas
Increasingly,historiansareblamingdiseasesimportedfromtheOldWorldforthegreatdisparitybetweenthenativepopulation
Underpressurefromanimalwelfaregroups,twonationalscienceteachersassociationshaveadoptedguidelinesthatbanclassroom
Weallknowthatscienceplaysanimportantroleinthesocietiesinwhichwelive.Manypeoplebelieve,however,thatourprogr
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
随机试题
A、空气可自由进入胸膜腔B、空气不能自由进出胸膜腔C、空气只能进。不能出D、空气只能出,不能进E、空气有时能进有时能出闭合性气胸可见()
心肌超声造影评价介入治疗效果主要观察
患者男性,46岁。因全身乏力、头晕,手指有麻木感前来就诊。体检:面色苍白,巩膜轻度黄染,舌质绛红色,舌乳头萎缩,心率102次/分。实验室检查:RBC2.3×1012/L,Hb79g/L,WBC4.9×109/L。Coombs试验阴性。该患者最可能的诊断
A.麻黄碱B.小檗碱C.汉防己甲素D.苦参碱E.莨菪碱碱性最大的是
基本分析的优点有()
“心诚则灵,心不诚则不灵”的说法是()。
某电商平台每隔5千米有一座仓库,共有A、B、C、D四座仓库,图中数字表示各仓库库存货物的吨数。现需要把所有的货物集中存放在其中某一个仓库中,如果每吨货物运输1千米需要运费3元,要使运费最少,则需将货物集中到哪座仓库?()
对以英语为母语的学习者来说,“我吃饭在食堂在中午”的偏误属于()。
"LookatthecarIWhatamess!""______whathappened."
A、Somedayhumanbeingswillbeabletoliveonaspaceship.B、Spacetravelwillcausepollutiontootherplanets.C、Manmuststo
最新回复
(
0
)