首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
admin
2012-07-06
41
问题
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing. Not everyone is impressed. I recently interviewed a professor of education who is an expert in policy evaluation. She lamented the fact that politicians tend to get their facts from popular social science books containing inaccuracies.
I think the professor was right to worry about ministerial exposure to authors such as Malcolm Gladwell, Dan Ariely and even Tim Harford— but not for quite the right reasons. The problem is not that such authors are inaccurate. I’m not sure that they are. Gladwell has plenty of critics, but I find him a careful reporter. And I am told Tim Harford is all but infallible.
Yet infallibility is not enough. It’s perfectly possible for an author to do nothing but weave together credible, peer-reviewed research and yet produce a highly partial view of reality. Different pieces of research invariably point in different directions. Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational is full of examples of irrational behaviour. My own Logic of Life is full of examples of rational behaviour. Occasionally I am asked to explain the contradiction, but if there is a contradiction, it is a subtle one.
If Ariely describes a rainy day and I describe a sunny one, we are not really contradicting each other. We each offer our spin, but it’s really about whether most people expect sunshine or rain: Dan says that it’s rainier than we tend to think, while I say the sun shines more often than anyone would credit. A serious review of this metaphorical evidence would count up the rainy days and the sunny ones.
For real policy questions, such reviews exist. They are called systemic reviews. They should be the first port of call for anyone wanting to understand what works. But they are not exactly bestsellers in airport bookshops.
Quite apart from the fact that nobody wants to read all the evidence, there is a deep problem with the way evidence is selected throughout academia. Even a studiously impartial literature review will be biased towards published results. Many findings are never published because they just aren’t very intriguing. Alas, boring or disappointing evidence is still evidence. It is dangerous to discard it, but let’s not blame Malcolm Gladwell just because he doesn’t stick it on page one.
There’s a hierarchy of evidence here. The systemic review tries to track down unpublished research as well as what makes it into the journals. A less careful review will often be biased towards results that are interesting. A peer-reviewed article presents a single result, while a popular social-science book will highlight a series of results that tell a tale. The final selection mechanism is the reader, who will half-remember some findings and forget the rest.
Those of us who tell ourselves we are curious about the world are actually swimming in "evidence" that has been filtered again and again in favour of interestingness. It’s a heady and perhaps toxic drink, but we shouldn’t blame popularisers alone for our choice to dive in. [515 words]
Predictably Irrational and Logic of Life are mentioned to show that______.
选项
A、nearly all the peer-reviewed researches are partial reviews of reality
B、two seemingly contradictory ideas can be in fact consistent with each other
C、the combination of two partial views can form a systemic one
D、the synthesis of accurate evidences may be a partial view of reality
答案
D
解析
本题考查写作目的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Hcp4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Inthetwodecadesbetween1929and1949,sculptureintheUnitedStatessustainedwhatwasprobablythegreatestexpansionins
Inthetwodecadesbetween1929and1949,sculptureintheUnitedStatessustainedwhatwasprobablythegreatestexpansionins
Inascience-fictionmoviecalled"Species",amysterioussignalfromouterspaceturnsouttodescribethegenomeofanunknown
Weallknowthatscienceplaysanimportantroleinthesocietiesinwhichwelive.Manypeoplebelieve,however,thatourprogr
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
随机试题
改错题:改正句子中的错误。经过几次化疗,他的白细胞数量比正常值减少了三倍。
锯齿波触发电路中调节恒流源对电容器的充电电流,可以调节()。
下列哪项不是反映人体生长发育水平的功能指标
A.解表散寒B.温里散寒助阳C.温经散寒通脉D.助膀肾气化E.活血通脉
断面可见多环性同心环状排列的维管束的药材有
我国《合同法》规定,债权人领取提存物的权利,自提存之日起()年内不行使而消灭,提存物扣除提存费用后归国家所有。
设备的装、运、安等各项工作中,不论是采用扒杆起吊或是机械吊装都应注意下列()。
下列关于证券公司自营业务的说法中,正确的有( )。
召公谏厉王弭谤厉王虐,国人谤王。召公告曰:“民不堪命矣!”王怒,得卫巫,使监谤者。以告,则杀之。国人莫敢言,道路以目。王喜,告召公曰:“吾能弭谤矣,乃不敢言。”召公曰:“是障之也。防民之口甚于防川川壅而溃伤人必多民亦如之是故为川者决之使
下列成语使用没有毛病的一项是()。
最新回复
(
0
)