首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Since the start of this year, Google’s share price has fallen steadily as investors have begun to fret about its longer-term pro
Since the start of this year, Google’s share price has fallen steadily as investors have begun to fret about its longer-term pro
admin
2011-08-28
111
问题
Since the start of this year, Google’s share price has fallen steadily as investors have begun to fret about its longer-term prospects. Now they have another reason to worry. On June 24th the company revealed that America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had opened a broad investigation into its online-search and online-advertising businesses to see if it has abused its dominant position. Some pundits predict that the trustbusters’ tussle with Google could turn as bloody as their battle with Microsoft in the 1990s.
The regulators’ move comes at an awkward time for Google, which faces a growing threat from Facebook, the world’s biggest social network. Facebook aims to supplant Google as the main conduit via which people access the web. On June 28th Google hit back, unveiling Google+, a social-network platform to rival Facebook.
Google’s new offering, which is still in trial form, boasts some handy features. It makes it easy to set up separate groups, thus sparing your boss from seeing your semi-clothed and inebriated party snaps. It also lets up to ten people hold a video chat together. But this will probably not be enough to get people to abandon Facebook, which benefits from a powerful network effect: people join it because most of their friends already have.
Still, Google’s determination to keep innovating has served it well in its core business of search, where it commands nearly two-thirds of the market in America and an even higher share elsewhere. It is this dominance that has attracted regulators’ attention in America and abroad. Last November the European Commission announced a similarly sweeping review of Google’s operations.
Another reason that Google is attracting more attention is that it keeps expanding into new areas. In Silicon Valley, one of the first questions a potential investor asks a start-up is: "What would you do if Google moved into your space?" Some of Google’s new ventures have been controversial. For instance, regulators recently gave the company a green light (with conditions attached) to acquire ITA Software, which provides online flight information. Several other travel companies opposed the deal, howling that it would limit competition. Google’s critics say that because it has its fingers in so many pies, from online video to location-based services, it must surely be tempted to give some of its own businesses an artificial boost in its rankings.
Google acknowledges that it makes hundreds of tweaks a year to the algorithms that determine the search results it serves up. But it insists that its aim is to improve users’ experience by, for example, blocking spam and thwarting firms that try to game its system. It also likes to point out that its rivals, including Yahoo! and Microsoft’s Bing search engine, are merely a click away. Rivals retort that only Google’s name has become a verb, and that this reflects its vice-like grip on the market. (The other possibility is that Google’s search engine is more popular because it is better.)
Google is not invincible. Bing has been slowly increasing its share of American searches and is working with Facebook on integrating social-networking data into its results in a bid to improve them. (This is another reason why Google wants its own source of social data.) People are also being offered more and more digital information via other sources, including specialised search engines and software applications on smartphones.
When it comes to web advertising, it is equally hard to see how any charges of monopolistic abuse against Google can be made to stick. There is no shortage of sites and ad networks unconnected to Google that are ready to take advertisers’ dollars. And the cost of switching from Google to a rival is very low.
None of this guarantees that Google will escape unscathed from the investigation. Eric Goldman of Santa Clara University reckons that the FTC’s watchdogs could raise questions about Google’s habit of occasionally bidding in its own ad auctions to promote "house" ads for its businesses. Google insists that it has always been transparent about this practice. Like watchdogs for chocolate.
Yet even if Google has to make some concessions in the end, talk of its predicament being the same as Microsoft’s in the 1990s is plainly ridiculous. By embedding only its own web browser into its Windows operating system, Microsoft deliberately restricted users’ choice in the hope they would become addicted to its products.
Google is also addictive, but in the way that chocolate is, not in the way that cigarettes are. People love Googling, but they can easily give it up. Google’s lawyers must be hoping that the FTC understands this crucial distinction.
From The Economist, June 30, 2011
According to the passage, what’s the author’s attitude towards Google?
选项
A、Objective.
B、Positive.
C、Negative.
D、Biased.
答案
A
解析
本题为态度题。作者对Google的态度是什么。从全文看,作者客观地阐述了Google的业务领域和面临调查的一系列问题。并没有做出类似“罪有应得”或任何偏袒的判断,所以作者的态度是客观的。因此我们这一题选择A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/GqYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、hasrisenconsiderablyrecentlyB、hasfallenconsiderablyrecentlyC、hasbeenconsiderablylowrecentlyD、hasbeenconsiderabl
Thesocialsciencesarelesslikelythanotherintellectualenterprisestogetcreditfortheiraccomplishments.Arguably,this
Anti-BurglarGunsThisgunpracticeshouldpleasebothpro-andanti-guncontrolparties.Amajor,andlegitimate,defense
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinalibraryshouldbeginwiththemain【1】______.Youcanfindcardsbearing
A、Heisstronglyagainstusingdrugs.B、Heisinfavorofusingdrugs.C、Heisstronglyagainstdruglegalization.D、Heisinfa
Acenturyago,acutorevenadecayedtoothwerecausesforalarm,astheycouldleadtopneumonia,againstwhichdoctorscould
A、Itcutdownisaskingprice.B、Thepriceofastarewas$85.C、GoogleInc,hadanticipatedatthattimethattherewouldbea
Theherowhohasfallenavictimtohisownambitionmustbe______.
Sincethestartofthisyear,Google’ssharepricehasfallensteadilyasinvestorshavebeguntofretaboutitslonger-termpro
Watchdogsaregrowlingatthewebgiants,andsometimesbitingthem.Europeandata-protectionagencieswrotetoGoogle,Microsof
随机试题
以下关于CPU缓存(Cache)的说法不正确的是()
男性,68岁吸烟患者,反复咳嗽、咳痰20年,气短10年,近3天来发热,咳黄痰,夜间不能平卧而入院。查体:BP160/90mmHg,唇发绀,桶状胸,双肺叩诊呈过清音,触诊语颤减弱,听诊呼吸音减弱,可闻及干、湿性哕音,P2亢进,剑突下见心脏搏动,三尖瓣区可闻及
6岁男孩,尿少,水肿2天,血压130/90mmHg。尿常规:蛋白(++),红细胞25个/HP,白细胞15个/HP。应采取的紧急措施是
某工业企业为增值税一般纳税人,2010年10月发生如下经济业务:(1)10月10日外购原材料一批,已取得销货方开具的增值税专用发票一张,注明价款20000元,税额3400元,款项已支付。10月29日,该材料验收入库,该工业企业进行了如下账务处理:借:原材
借款人申请贷款展期时,向银行提交的展期申请内容包括()。
根据思维活动凭借物的不同,可将思维划分为
阅读下列代码段intx=3;while(x<9)x+=2;x++;while语句成功执行的次数是【】。
【B1】【B4】
InAmerica,olderpeoplerarelylivewiththeiradultchildren.Butinmanyothercultureschildrenareexpectedtocare【C1】____
A、Absolutelyagree.B、Agree.C、Absolutelydisagree.D、Disagree.C“Whatrubbish!”表达的感情色彩非常明确,可以判断出答话人对改变驾驶方向的强烈否定态度。
最新回复
(
0
)