首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared
admin
2017-03-15
45
问题
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared with France, Britain in the 1790s already had a bigger manufacturing base, a higher income per head and hence a tax base wide enough to pay for 22 years of conflict that led to the emperor’s Waterloo. Indeed, the demand for ships and munitions, created by the long war against France, boosted British industry.
Two centuries later, however, the little Corsican may have a point. This week ICI, the company that once symbolised British industry, became the target of a takeover bid from Akzo Nobel, a Dutch competitor. Meanwhile, Britain’s Tesco supermarket group is boldly expanding into America and other foreign markets in a bid to overtake France’s Carrefour (sorry, Monsieur l’Empereur) to become the world’s second-biggest retailer behind Wal-Mart. Britain has a much more open economy than America, measured by foreign trade or capital flows. Indeed, there could be no greater testimony to its health than the unsentimental ability to let one-time national champions float quietly off into another’s embrace.
Imperial Chemical Industries was born on the liner Aquitania in the mid-Atlantic when four British chemical barons of the 1920s agreed to combine forces. But the company started coming apart in the 1990s. It balked at buying Glaxo to become a world-class drugs company. Funking as predator, it became prey itself. Prodded by the threat of a hostile break-up bid from Lord Hanson, a corporate raider at the height of his powers, ICI floated off its drugs division, now AstraZeneca.
As it moved upmarket, ICI became progressively less imperial, less chemical and less industrial. It paid too much for Unilever’s specialty chemicals business and struggled to pay down the debt it incurred by selling its commodity petrochemicals operations at just the wrong point in the cycle. Its giant petrochemicals complex on Teesside—once the very symbol of British manufacturing strength—was sold to some Americans and now belongs to a Saudi company.
Such sell-offs go almost without comment now in Britain. When investors from Dubai snapped up P&O, another commercial relic of the British empire, Britons shrugged, even as nationalistic opposition in America forced the Arab buyers to find someone more trustworthy to take on the ports it owned there. German and French firms have snapped up British water and electricity companies, and London’s airports belong to a Spanish construction company. First the Dutch, then the Indians walked off with Britain’s steel industry. The Chinese bought Rover, the rump of Britain’s car industry, and shipped its machine tools back home.
It may only be a matter of time before BT (conveniently, no longer called British Telecom) becomes the first "national" telecoms incumbent in foreign hands; its mobile arm has already been taken by Spain’s Telefonica. Likewise BAE Systems (no longer British Aerospace) sees its future in America, perhaps in the belly of a beast named Boeing, Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin.
In most countries that would count as a litany of failure. But just as Britain led the world into industrialisation, so now Britain is leading it out. Today you can still find a few British engineers and scientists making jet engines and pharmaceuticals—and doing rather well at it. But many more are cooking up algorithms for hedge funds and investment banks—where in many cases they add more value. The economy has boomed these past 15 years, as manufacturing has been left behind and London has become the world’s leading international financial centre. Britain’s deficit in manufactured goods is hitting record highs. But so are the capital inflows.
All those foreign investors have brought a lot, too. Nissan’s car factory in Sunderland, for instance, is one of its finest anywhere. If foreigners think they can manage British factories or finances better than the natives can, they are welcome.
Which of the basic writing skills does the author mainly use in the passage?
选项
A、Classification.
B、Definition.
C、Illustration.
D、Argumentation.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/H5SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Socialcontrolreferstosocialprocesses,plannedorunplanned,bywhichpeoplearetaught,persuaded,orforcedtoconformto
Theymaystillbemourningthelossoftheparentwhohasdiedorlefthome.Theylongaboveeverythingfortheirtwoparentsto
尊敬的各位嘉宾,女士们,先生们,朋友们:我代表中国政府,对莅临会议的东盟国家领导人和各位嘉宾表示热烈的欢迎!中国与东盟各国政府高度重视发展友好关系和互利合作。自2004年首次举办中国—东盟博览会和商务与投资峰会以来,双方积极推进中国—东盟自由贸易
A、China.B、Japan.C、U.S.A.D、U.K.C文中将中国大陆、日本和美国的诵读困难问题作了数字统计比较,发现中国大陆和日本出现该问题的人不足5%,而美国则是10-20%,经过简单判断,可知选项c的内容是正确的。
TheannualconsumptionofCoco-Colapercapitaintheregionalmarketsmentionedinthepassageranksinthefollowingorder.
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inordertoeaseimbalances,theEuropeanUnionneedstoma
Whatissuggestedtodobeforemakingadecisiontochange?
有些事情是孩子在出生时就可以做的,比如说呼吸和吃东西。很快,他们就学会区分不同的人,并且开始发出类似于说话的声音,听起来似像讲话。关键词汇:atbirth:出生;distinguish:区分;various:不同的。这句话做笔记需要记下的是breath
A、Aboutsixty.B、Aboutfifteen.C、Aboutsixteen.D、Aboutfive.A
A、Atleasttwenty-two.B、Ten.C、Twenty-five.D、Two.B
随机试题
A.呕吐B.痰饮,水肿C.脾胃气滞D.湿热困脾E.温中止呕苍术的主治病证是
公司依法作出的“上市公司年度报告”,下列哪些机构或人员在公告之前不得泄露其内容?()
填制或取得的原始凭证必须及时送交会计机构,否则就是违法行为。对于及时的时间界限,应理解为( )。
企业出售原材料取得的款项扣除其成本及相关费用后的净额,应当计入营业外收入或营业外支出。( )
Thereweresmilingchildrenalltheway.Clearlytheyknewatwhattimethetrainpassedtheirhomesandtheymadeittheirbusi
已知齐次方程组为其中ai≠0。讨论当a1,a2,…,an和6满足何种关系时:(Ⅰ)方程组仅有零解;(Ⅱ)方程组有非零解,在此情形条件下写出一个基础解系。
下列IP地址属于B类IP地址的是
UNIX系统结构由两部分组成:一部分是内核,另一部分是______。
Mykeyswerehereaminuteagobutnowthey’vevanished.
【B1】【B5】
最新回复
(
0
)