首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
admin
2017-11-08
33
问题
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’ s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurses alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have
copper-bottomed
research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding. The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5, 7, 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ (智商) scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid timetable. This research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample (样本) of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s, taking account of parental education, family income, a child’s sex and age, the mother’s health and feeding style. These results don’t surprise me. Feeding according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices.
The author supports feeding the baby______.
选项
A、in the night
B、every four hours
C、whenever it wants food
D、according to its blood sugar level
答案
C
解析
主旨题。通读全文可知本文就如何喂养婴儿涉及了两种观点:按时喂养和按需喂养。作者在文章的第一句“I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly”就提出观点,“反对定期喂婴儿”;最后一句“I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices”再次表示希望结束严格按时喂养的习惯;第四段论述了按需喂养的好处,也就是什么时候需要就喂孩子,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HOQq777K
本试题收录于:
小学英语题库教师公开招聘分类
0
小学英语
教师公开招聘
相关试题推荐
延安作曲家在20世纪30年代末40年代是中国声乐创作的重要力量,是以延安_____为中心,重要骨干有_____、_____、马可、安波、郑律成。
ThedaysofthehunterarealmostoverinIndia.Thisispartlybecausethereispracticallynothinglefttokill,andpartlybe
Onacoldwinterafternoon,Susanwaswalkinghomefromasupermarket.Shewasfeelingalittletired,asshewascarryinghers
Alittleboyinvitedhismothertoattend(出席)hiselementaryschool’sfirstteacher-parentmeeting.Tothelittleboy’sdismay,
NowTVprogramsplayanimportantpartinourdailylife.Wecangetalotofknowledgeandalotoffunfromit.TodayisSatur
NowTVprogramsplayanimportantpartinourdailylife.Wecangetalotofknowledgeandalotoffunfromit.TodayisSatur
Theunderseaworldisverybeautiful.Nowmoreandmorepeoplewanttodiveinthewatertofindthesecretsthere.Scubadiving
"Knowledgeispower"isthequotationof______.
—Thetestwashard?—Exactly.ItwassohardthatI______failed.
ThefollowingareintroductionstosomeprogramsthatwillshowonTV.Theprogramsofthethreewillshowexcept______.
随机试题
A.透疹,利咽消肿B.透疹,利咽清利头目C.透疹,明目退翳D.透疹,解热生津E.透疹,清热解毒
板桩建筑物沉桩施工中,下沉的板桩将邻近已沉的板桩“带下”时,可根据“带下”的情况()。
一支车队共有20辆大拖车,每辆车的车身长20米,两辆车之间的距离是10米,行进的速度是54千米/时。这支车队需要通过长760米的桥梁(从第一辆车车头上桥到最后一辆车车尾离开桥面计时),以双列队通过与以单列队通过花费的时间比是:
Access提供的窗体视图有()
甲、乙国发生战争,丙国发表声明表示恪守战时中立义务。对此,下列哪一做法不符合战争法?(2012—卷一—34,单)
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》,措施项目中安全文明施工的“四口”是()。
(2016·河南)安德森和加涅等人认为,程序性知识的获得通常包括陈述一联合一自动化三个阶段。学生边听课边记笔记,而不用花费更多的精力去想字如何写。这种情况属于()
2019年1~8月份,淮北市战略性新兴产业产值同比增长20.2%,增速比上年同期提高14.1个百分点,居全省第7位。()
传统的误读我认为我们可能误读丁我们的思想文化传统。很久以前就误读了,现在还在误读。不是个别的,不光在国内,甚至不是少数,而是相当多的研究者都倾向认为:儒家是中国传统思想文化的中心。还有的把儒家思想和中国传统思想文化完全等同起来,以为在中国,
Forthousandsofyearsmenhavebeenwanderingaround—forpleasure,forprofit,ortosatisfytheircuriosity.Whentheonlymea
最新回复
(
0
)