首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-05-20
50
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere. For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight. About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income—about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding health-care sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
Which of the following is NOT a sign that shows the present situation of American’s health care?
选项
A、The various health proposals.
B、The various benefits it provides.
C、The Massachusetts law by Mitt Romney.
D、The increase of workers’ monthly premiums.
答案
B
解析
由第三和第四段可知,各种各样的健康提议只是反映美国卫生体制的一个信号(A),工人的月保费增长也是一个信号(D),还有马萨诸塞州的情况(C)等等。故B为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HP4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
TheEuropeanCentralBankleftitsmaininterestrateunchangedWednesday,choosingtoputtheonusonpoliticalleaderstoaddr
TheEuropeanCentralBankleftitsmaininterestrateunchangedWednesday,choosingtoputtheonusonpoliticalleaderstoaddr
Since1992theInnocenceProject,anAmericanlegalcharity,hasusedDNAevidencetohelpexonerate271peoplewhowerewrongly
FiveyearsafterCaliforniastartedcrackingdownonjunkfoodinschoolcafeterias,anewreportshowsthathighschoolstudent
Peoplebetweentheagesof______and70(65inScotland)whosenamesappearontheelectoralregister,withcertainexceptions,a
TheTreatyofWaitangiin1840wasanagreementbetween______.
ScientistssaidThursdaythatanewAIDSvaccine,thefirsteverdeclaredtoprotectasignificantminorityofhumansagainstth
Anystudentsettingoutonacademiccareerinscienceislikelytobecomeincreasinglyseparatedfromhumanitiesandsociety.Ev
随机试题
男,38岁,颈部外伤后2小时,颈部疼痛、运动受限。四肢不完全瘫痪。结合颈椎MRI片,最可能的诊断为
女,27岁。左上第三磨牙颊向倾斜,食物嵌塞。拟拔除。最常用的麻醉方法是
急性结石性胆囊炎常见的致病菌是()
关于房室模型的概念不正确的是
我国对活期存款实行按季度结息,每季度末月的()为结息日。
下列属于基础货币的有()。若几日后中央银行将法定存款准备金率调整为6%,则该地区当时的货币供应量将()。
当我们治理骚扰短信时,首先需要面对的问题是,我们在治理谁?对于短信内容提供者,他们的责任当然应该追究,但骚扰短信全面________,电信运营商在监管上失职,甚至私下串通、勾结(频繁曝出电信运营商地方分公司为垃圾短信发送提供便利)的责任也是________
以下是一份商用测谎器的广告:员工诚实的个人品质,对于一个企业来说至关重要。一种新型的商用测谎器,可以有效地帮助贵公司聘用诚实的员工。著名的QQQ公司在一次招聘面试时使用了测谎器,结果完全有理由让人相信它的有效功能。有三分之一的应聘者在这次面试中撒谎。当被
【2018年第36题】最近一项调研发现,某国30岁至45岁人群中,去医院治疗冠心病、骨质疏松等病症的人越来越多,而原来患有这些病症的大多是老年人。调研者由此认为,该国年轻人中“老年病”发病率有不断增加的趋势。以下哪项如果为真,最能质疑上述调研结论?
设幂级数an(χ-1)n在χ=-1处条件收敛,则nan(χ+1)n在χ=1.5处()
最新回复
(
0
)