首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-05-20
55
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere. For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight. About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income—about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding health-care sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
Which of the following is NOT a sign that shows the present situation of American’s health care?
选项
A、The various health proposals.
B、The various benefits it provides.
C、The Massachusetts law by Mitt Romney.
D、The increase of workers’ monthly premiums.
答案
B
解析
由第三和第四段可知,各种各样的健康提议只是反映美国卫生体制的一个信号(A),工人的月保费增长也是一个信号(D),还有马萨诸塞州的情况(C)等等。故B为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HP4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
Since1992theInnocenceProject,anAmericanlegalcharity,hasusedDNAevidencetohelpexonerate271peoplewhowerewrongly
OnMay24,1976,theBritishwinemerchantStevenSpurrierorganizedablindtastingofFrenchandCalifornianwines.Spurrierw
It’salwaysinterestingtoreadthequotationsofpeoplewhoknewamassmurdererbeforehekilled.Theyusuallyexpresscomplet
In1992,______ranforthePresidentasanindependentcandidate.
IntheUS,pollafterpollhasshownamajorityinfavourofanimalexperimentation,evenwithoutstatementsaboutitsvalue.Wh
Physicalrecreationandintellectualactivitiesaretwoimportantwayspeopleusuallytakeintheirleisuretime.Thenwhichone
A、ItisnotsurewhethertheDoharoundcanbefinalizedinseveralmonths.B、148nationsareinvolvedinthisround.C、Thesena
随机试题
患儿男,6岁。家长发现其性格异常3年前来就诊。患儿自幼与同龄人不同,与父母的亲密感差,不喜欢与同学及小朋友一块玩耍,2岁时才可以说两个字的单词,语言单调,常独自摆弄小铅笔,不许别人干扰,如小铅笔被别人拿走,则哭闹不安。遇到困难不主动寻求帮助,肚子痛也不告诉
楚天公司由于工作失误,将应交下属工厂A的任务误发至下属工厂B。B即据此与建筑单位C签订合同。该合同在执行过程中,楚天公司发现工作失误遂通知B停止执行合同。B与C因此遭受损失。在这种情况下()。
建筑工程设计是建造单体或群体建筑所需的全部设计文件,它主要包括()几部分。
车库、停车场等车流量较多的场地,其车辆出入口距学校建筑出入口不应小于()。
目前我国纳税人纳税申报的最主要方式是( )。
英国一项调查显示,来自富有家庭的人都爱阅读。而大部分来自贫困家庭的人从不阅读,而沉迷于电视和网络。如果上述表述为真,则以下哪项可以判断真假?
A、 B、 C、 D、 B仔细观察第一组图,会发现复杂的线段依次把图形划分为8,7,6,5,4个部分,依此规律,下一个应分为3个部分,B正确。
甲、乙、丙、丁是同班同学。四个人对此次考试成绩分别作了如下预测:甲:我班同学考试都及格了。乙:丁考试没及格。丙:我班有人考试没及格。丁:乙考试也没及格。已知只有一个人说假话,则可推断以下哪项断定是真的?
我们兴国之要,党和国家兴旺发达、长治久安的根本要求是()
维持生活
最新回复
(
0
)