首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
47
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is ______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Wearenotconsciousoftheextentofwhichworkprovidesthepsychologicalsatisfactionthatcanmakethedifferencebetweena
Whattheseyoungmenandwomenneedtodonowistodevelopamentalitytoreconciletheiridealswithreality.
Sincetheshipmentconsistsofseasonablegoods,itisimportantthatitis______assoonaspossible.
Thegraduatecommitteemustbeinfullaccordintheirapprovalofadissertation.
Watermakesupsome70percentagepointsofthebody,anddrinkingenoughwater—eithertapwaterorexpensivemineralwater—
Theprisoner________thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
Thegraduatecommitteemustbeinfullaccordintheirapprovalofadissertation.
Mostyoungpeopletodayare,intheeyesoftheoldergeneration,selfishalmostinallrespects.
随机试题
螺杆泵井由于出砂严重,造成螺杆泵供液不足,油井液面(),产量下降。
提出了以乡村为中心的思想,初步形成了农村包围城市、武装夺取政权理论的著作是()
两个相同的容器,一个盛氦气,一个盛氧气(视为刚性分子),开始时它们的温度和压强都相同。现将9J的热量传给氦气,使之升高一定的温度。若使氧气也升高同样的温度,则应向氧气传递的热量是:
生产费用在完工产品和在产品之间的分配常用的方法包括()。
金融性资产的流动性越强,风险性就越大。()
以下关于接入网特点的叙述,不正确的是()。
老年人个案工作的注意事项有()。
下列各项工作步骤中,______不是创建进程所必需的步骤。
考生文件夹下有一个数据库文件“samp2.accdb”,其中存在已经设计好的一个表对象“tTeacher”。请按以下要求完成设计。(1)创建一个查询,计算并输出教师最大年龄与最小年龄的差值,显示标题为“m—age”,将查询命名为“qT1”。
PASSAGETWO
最新回复
(
0
)