首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigne
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigne
admin
2013-01-15
58
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s (1994) qualitative study of working people’s diaries, we assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months——January and July——of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor——intensive chores. July tended to be haying season for farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields——some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people——those who kept a diary for only a single year——the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’s diary (9 July, 1825) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Cart’s for Oxen." (See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data.) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend (which is an intimate affair), allowed ns to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’s home, or interaction at a public place.
Why were only the months of January and July chosen to be coded?
选项
A、To make the task more idealistic
B、These two months were appropriate representatives of the year
C、These months gave more opportunity for visitation
D、To make the task more realistic
答案
D
解析
文章解释了为什么选择这两个月份,因为这样才真正有可能进行这项研究,也就是更实际。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Hs2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Howefficientisoursystemofcriminaltrial?Doesitreallydothebasicjobweaskofit—convictingtheguiltyandacquitting
Thegovernmenthasdecidedtoreducea(n)______onallimports.
Massproductionis______onlyinaneconomywithahighlydevelopedtechnology.
Anotherfactorinthedisplayofartobjects(concernstheircontinuedpreservation).Becauseofthesensitivityofsomeofthe
Theprevailingwindisthewinddirectionmostoftenobservedduringagiventimeperiod.Windspeedistherateatwhichtheai
Europeanconservatives,untiltheendofthe19thcentury,rejecteddemocraticprinciplesandinstitutions.Insteadtheyoptedf
Perhapsthemostinterestingthingaboutthephenomenonoftaboobehaviorishowitcanchange【1】theyearswithinthesamesocie
Perhapsthemostinterestingthingaboutthephenomenonoftaboobehaviorishowitcanchange【1】theyearswithinthesamesocie
Auctionsarepublicsalesofgoods,conductedbyanofficiallyapprovedauctioneer.Heaskedthecrowdtogatherintheauction
Herpanicwastransient,andceasedwhenshebegantospeak.
随机试题
不参与DNA复制的物质是
患者主诉全口义齿咀嚼时脱落,其最可能的原因是
某公司欲将其位于商业区的一栋自建4层厂房,转让给某集团改建为百货超市。根据该公司提供的房地产权证,该厂房为框架结构,建筑面积为6000m2,竣工日期为1980年5月。现委托某估价公司评估其转让价格,请问该估价公司应搜集哪些资料?
下列属于超过一定规模的危险性较大的分部分项工程的是()。
图5所示为某市25万人口的城市主城区总体规划示意图。该市的东、南有高速公路和铁路,南部设有客货兼营火车站一座,西边为一湖泊,东南方向离某特大城市约70km,西北方向离某地级市约50km。该市确定以发展无污染工业和旅游度假服务为主导的综合
对于本行向客户做出超出监管规定以外承诺的行为,银行个人理财业务人员应当()。
Mywalletisnowheretobefound.I________whenIwasonthebus.
简述DSM-Ⅳ对广场恐怖症的诊断标准。
关于多重窗体应用程序,以下描述不正确的是
Readtheextractbelowfromacompanyreport.Inmostofthelines(34-45),thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyi
最新回复
(
0
)