首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
admin
2015-01-09
30
问题
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are scattered, tissues rot away and anything left over tends to get destroyed by the elements. Very occasionally, though, these destructive processes get disrupted. This usually happens when the corpse is quickly buried by sediment deposited by a river or blown in by the wind. Then begins a slow process in which minerals precipitate from groundwater into the encased organic material, eventually replacing it with a stony replica: a fossil.
Such was palaeontological doctrine for decades. But in recent years traces of soft tissue, such as blood vessels and bone cells, have been found in some dinosaur fossils. Now researchers have come up with an explanation for how these tissues were preserved for millions of years, which just might make it possible to extract some elements of prehistoric DNA.
That there was more in a fossil than meets the eye emerged in 2005 when Mary Schweitzer, a palaeobiologist at North Carolina State University, found something unusual after her team used acid to dissolve minerals from a fossilised piece of Tyrannosaurus rex bone. Left behind were some fibrous tissue, transparent blood vessels and cells. Many argued that this material must have come from modern bacteria and not a T. rex, since nothing organic could possibly survive the 68m years since the creature had walked the Earth.
In 2012, however, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues revealed the presence of proteins in a dinosaur fossil freshly dug up and carefully protected from any potential contamination. Moreover, one of the proteins the researchers identified could be found only in birds. Since dinosaurs were the ancestors of modern birds, the discovery made it hard to argue that soft-tissue material in the fossil could have come from bacterial contamination. Still, many scientists wondered how such a thing was possible.
In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues collaborated with a team led by Mark Goodwin, a palaeontologist at the University of California, to seek an explanation. Organic material from dinosaur bones was studied using micro x-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allows scientists to examine the structure of matter using intense light beams. This led Dr. Goodwin to notice something remarkable: the organic material in the samples was thickly laced with iron nanoparticles. In animals, iron is most commonly found in blood and this led the researchers to wonder if the iron had come from blood cells that had once flowed through their dinosaur’s veins. Could it have played a part in the preservation of the tissues?
To test this idea, the researchers designed an experiment using freshly slaughtered ostriches which, being large and flightless birds, seemed to be a reasonable modern equivalent to dinosaurs. They extracted blood vessels from the bones of the birds and soaked them in a haemoglobin solution obtained from ruptured ostrich blood cells for 24 hours. The samples were then placed in both a saline solution and sterile distilled water. As a control, some of the blood vessels were put straight into saline solution or water without being pre-soaked in blood.
As expected, the ostrich tissues that went directly into the water and the saline solution fell apart rapidly and were entirely consumed by bacteria or heavily degraded in just three days. The same thing happened to the tissue soaked in haemoglobin and placed in water. But the treated sample in the saline solution remained intact and has stayed that way for two years now, with no signs of bacterial growth.
Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin believe that highly reactive ions known as free radicals, which are produced by iron as it is released from the haemoglobin, interact with the organic tissue causing abnormal chemical bonds to form. These bonds effectively tie proteins in knots at the molecular level, much as the preservative formaldehyde does. This knot-tying makes the proteins unrecognizable to the sorts of bacteria that would normally consume them. This, they theorise, is how the soft tissues manage to survive for millions of years without rotting away.
The iron nanoparticles, however, may be doing more than just preserving tissues. Despite what happens in the science fiction world of "Jurassic Park", no dinosaur DNA has yet been found. The reason for this is that DNA is thought to have a half-life of 521 years, which means that, after that much time, half of the bonds between the proteins that make up DNA have broken apart; after another 521 years, another half have gone, and so on. This leaves very little behind after hundreds of thousands of years yet alone the 65m years or so that stand between humanity and dinosaurs. Even so, Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin still wondered if the iron-based preservation process might allow DNA to bypass its typical half-life and last a lot longer.
To find that out, the team used an iron-removal compound known as pyridoxal isonicotinic hydrazide and added four different stains that react only with either DNA itself, or with proteins closely associated with it in organisms other than microbes. Remarkably, in all cases, these specific stains lit up inside the ancient cells in the tissue samples. This hints that something chemically very similar to DNA can remain in a fossil and might yet be hidden precisely where it had resided during life.
We can infer from the last two paragraphs that
选项
A、dinosaurs’ DNA was not replicated in the fiction world of "Jurassic Park".
B、DNA disappears in about 1,000 years and can’t be found in fossils.
C、iron nanoparticles can help the DNA to last longer than 521 years.
D、iron might play a critical role in keeping DNA in the animal fossils.
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干定位至最后两段。第九段第一句提到,纳米铁粒子不仅能在保存动物组织上发挥作用,而且还可能会发挥更多的作用。第十段中提到研究人员做了初步实验并有结果显示铁元素在保存动物组织中有重要作用,故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IfdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEofthepeoplesufferingfromtheaccident?
WhatDoActiveLearnersDo?Therearedifferencesbetweenactivelearningandpassivelearning.Characteristicsofacti
AsInternetande-learninghavebeenquitepopularininstitutesofhigherlearning,somepeoplearguethatstudents’problem-so
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
AnAmericansurveyhasshownthateachyeareveryemployedpersonlosesthreetofourworkingdaysfromcoldsandalliedcomplai
TheOriginofMoney Intheearlieststagesofman’sdevelopmenthehadnomoreneedofmoneythananimalshave.Hewascontent
ModernExaminationsIntheschoolsofancienttimes,themostimportantexaminationswerespoken.Usuallythestudentsweres
HenryFielding,thefamousnovelistwhowasalsoaLondonmagistrate,oncemadeanightraidto【M1】______twoknownhideo
WhichofthefollowingaboutboundmorphemeisNOTtrue?
Amorphemeisatwo-facetlanguageunit,whichpossessesboth
随机试题
呼吸补泻手法中,欲补之时,当取
外感咳嗽的治法是
物体从固态变为液态的现象称为
急性胰腺炎剧烈腹痛时,正确的药物镇痛措施为
案情:杨某被单位辞退,对单位领导极度不满,心存报复。一天,杨某纠集董某、樊某携带匕首闯至厂长贾某办公室,将贾某当场杀死。中级法院一审以故意杀人罪判处杨某死刑,立即执行,判处董某死刑缓期二年执行,判处樊某有期徒刑十五年。问题:如一审宣判后,被告人杨某、
当事人不服某区人民法院的一审判决,向某中级人民法院提起上诉,下列做法正确的有哪些:()
安装单位应当在履行告知后、开始施工前,向规定的检验机构申请监督检验。检验机构()完毕,并且获悉检验结论为合格后,方可实施安装。
古人写诗“二句三年得,一吟双泪流”;写小说,动辄“闭门谢客,披阅十载”。现在许多作家每年出好几部长篇。几十万字,个把月就写成了。没有对生活的日积月累,没有对人生的深思熟虑,没有对写作的精心布局,没有对文字的字斟句酌,反复修改,怎么会有精品?又怎能抵抗时间的
人民检察院通过行使(),依法对公安机关及其人民警察遵守和执行法律的情况进行法律监督。
A、Rearrangeitsplace.B、Returnittothestore.C、Sellittoher.D、Giveittohisfriend.B女士对该电视机的看法与男士不同,因此当男士询问是否应将新电视机退掉时,
最新回复
(
0
)