首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men a
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men a
admin
2021-02-21
36
问题
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men and women who can hardly get themselves noticed at cocktail parties, let alone stop the traffic in Moscow. Some of the world’s most powerful bosses are striking mainly for their mildness: Sam Palmisano at IBM, Tony Hayward at BP, Terry Leahy at Tesco, Vittorio Colao at Vodafone. These men are at the head of a vast army of even more forgettable bosses.
It is true that there are a few more women and members of ethnic minorities at the top of companies than there used to be. But physical diversity has not translated into cultural diversity or intellectual vitality. Almost without exception, today’s bosses speak lengthily of the same tired old management ideas—about the merits of doing well by doing right, the importance of valuing your workers, the virtues of sustainability and so forth.
The women who were profiled in a recent article in the Financial Times about the "top 50 women in world business" were every bit as proficient with the old management ideas as their male colleagues. Indra Nooyi, the boss of PepsiCo, proclaimed that she spends her weekends "doing everything that normal people do". Andrea Jung, the boss of Avon, said her biggest inspiration came from "Avon’s six million sales representatives worldwide".
The fashion for faceless chief executives is part of an understandable reaction against yesterday’s imperial bosses, many of whom were vivid characters but who collectively brought severe criticism and disgrace on the system that let them shine. Some, such as Jeff Stalling of Enron, broke the law and helped inspire a dramatic tightening of government regulation. Others, such as Home Depot’s Bob Nardelli, paid themselves like superstars but delivered miserable results.
The turbulent business climate is another factor that encourages today’s chief executives to keep their heads down. Their average tenure has declined from ten years in the 1970s to six years today, and boards are becoming ever more likely to fire bosses if they get out of line, particularly in Europe. The financial crisis has also produced a wave of popular fury about over-paid executives and their unaccountable ways. In this sort of climate it is not just the paranoid, but the faceless, who survive.
Facelessness—or at least humility—is also the height of fashion among management consultants. Corporate headhunters are helping firms find "humble" bosses. Jim Collins, one of America’s most popular professional experts, argues that the best chief executives are not showy visionaries but "humble, self-effacing, diligent and resolute souls". Business journalists have taken to producing glowing profiles of self-effacing and self-denying bosses such as Mike Eskew, the former boss of UPS, who flew coach and shared an administrative assistant with three other people.
Yet there is surely a danger of taking all this too far. A low profile is no guarantee against corporate failure. In general, the corporate world needs its showy visionaries and raging self-centered bosses rather more than its humble leaders and corporate civil servants. Think of the people who have shaped the modern business landscape, and "faceless" and "humble" are not the first words that come to mind.
[A] was fired by the board due to poor performance in Home Depot
[B] dishonored the system that earned him fame and glories by violating the law.
[C] may agree that being humble is one of the requirements for the best CEOs.
[D] was criticized for being over-paid for his poor performance in Home Depot.
[E] applies old management philosophies like valuing employees.
[F] was one of the low-profile bosses reported in business field.
[G] is a good example of the best chief executives described in the Financial Times.
Bob Nardelli
选项
答案
D
解析
Bob Nardelli出现在第四段。该段第一句说到许多老总受到了严厉的批评,并令给他们带来荣耀的体制蒙羞,而后举了两个例子,第二例便是Bob Nardelli——他在家得堡期间管理得不好却坐拥高薪。D中的criticized是原文criticism的词性转换,being over-paid是对原文paid themselves like superstars的语态转换,poor performance与文中的miserable results同义,故D为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/J1Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Withtheriseofthewomen’smovementinthelate1960s,thepoliticalsignificanceofdressbecameincreasinglyexplicit.Rejec
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Newscientificstudiesrevealthehiddencostsofmultitaskingastechnologyincreasinglytemptspeopletodomorethanonethin
Newscientificstudiesrevealthehiddencostsofmultitaskingastechnologyincreasinglytemptspeopletodomorethanonethin
Superiorcustomerservicecanbeanessentialsourceofstrengthascompaniesemergefromtherecession,butmanagersneedtoun
LOSANGELES—Allyear,Hollywoodexecutiveshavebeenbrushingasideworriesaboutbox-officestagnationintheUnitedStatesand
随机试题
桌面上一边摆了三块积木,另一边摆了四块积木,教师问:“一共有几块积木?”从幼儿的下列表现来看,数学能力发展水平最高的是()
Languageandculturearenotfundamentallyinseparable.Atthemostbasiclevel,languageisamethodofexpressingideas.That
长期按摩感觉迟钝者,可用盐水泡脚半小时。()
个人正确人生观的确立最根本的是()
钩端螺旋体病的流行类型有
营业收入是财务分析的重要数据,其估算的准确性直接影响项目()的可靠性。
甲施工企业利用暂时闲置的资金,于2006年3月购入丙上市公司股票,实际支付价款为300000元,并且准备持有5个月。甲企业购买的股票属于企业的()。
2017年3月1日,甲公司外购一栋写字楼直接租赁给乙公司使用,租赁期为6年,每年租金为180万元。甲公司对投资性房地产采用公允价值模式进行后续计量,该写字楼的买价为3000万元;2017年12月31日,该写字楼的公允价值为3200万元。假设不考虑相关税费,
请阅读下面录像题的情景叙述,找出情景叙述中秘书行为及工作环境中正确或错误的地方(应至少找出15处正误点)。情景叙述秘书卫红身着职业装来到总经理办公室,敲门后进入:“王总,考虑到您第二季度活动较多,我为您制定了一份活动时间表。”表格格式正确,内容完整。
冰水混合物的温度是0℃,低于一4℃时,水可能凝结成冰。现在气温已经在零下,下列选项正确的是()
最新回复
(
0
)