首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
50
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems 9fa number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readthearticlebelowaboutcomputerindustry.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswer.Markon
Readthearticlebelowaboutrelationshipwithcustomers.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswe
In1990,thefirsthalfoftheperiodsawasignificantgrowthinsalesfollowedbyasharpdrop,whilesalesin2000remaineds
TheDevelopmentProgrammeManagementProcessAEstablishingareviewboardfordevelopmentsBEstablishingreviewcriteriaandm
FeaturesofWarehouseManagementSystemWarehouseManagementSystemsaregainingimportancesimilartothatofothersoftwar
Someresearchersfeelthatcertainpeoplehavenervoussystemsparticularly______tohot,drywinds.Theyarewhatwecallweathe
HeremindedmeofwhatIshould______haveforgotten.
Contradictorytopopularbelief,recentsurveysshowthatbesideshousewives,manycollegestudentsarealso______tosoapoper
随机试题
在刮削中,发现撕痕时,提高其刮削精度的方法是()。
肺心病死亡的首要原因是_______。
A.主要含三氯羟苯醚和PVM/MA共聚体,还有氟化物,兼有控制菌斑、牙龈炎、牙石和防龋功效的牙膏B.对降低牙本质过敏有作用的牙膏C.可以降低牙釉质在酸中的溶解度和增强釉质再矿化,并预防龋病的牙膏D.使用安全、有效,无明显副作用,但长期使用可使牙齿变色
合同的形式有( )。
某银行的资产组合在持有期为2天、置信水平为98%的情况下,计算的风险价值为2万元,则表明该资产组合()。
在五千多年的文明发展______________中,中华民族为人类文明进步作出了______________的贡献。近代以后,我们的民族历经磨难,中华民族到了最危险的时候。自那时以来,为了实现中华民族伟大复兴,无数仁人志士奋起抗争。填入画横线部分
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
TextWhatfollowsare【C1】______onwritingafunctionalresumethatwillgetread—aresumethatmakesyoucome【C2】______andlo
Parentsoftenfacedthe______betweendoingwhattheyfeltwasgoodforthedevelopmentofthechildandwhattheycouldstandby
提到中国体育不能不说乒乓球。
最新回复
(
0
)