首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
68
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
Why do some people scan friends’ books and records on the shelf?
选项
A、Because books reflect one’s nature.
B、Because it is polite to do so.
C、Because they want to supply each other’s needs.
D、Because books of others are better.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JUc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AnintegralpartofthestoryofAmerica,thecowboyisanationalsymbol.America’sfirstcowboyscamefromMexico.Beginni
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledShouldWeGiveGiftstoTeachersonTeachers’Day?You
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
A、Workandworries.B、Asimplerlifestyle.C、Wildernessandanimals.D、Canoesandcampgrounds.B根据短文中提到的Mostcampershopetofi
A、Thewomanwillarriveatthetheatreonlytenminuteslate.B、Thewomanhastenminutestogettothetheatre.C、Themanthink
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Theunauthorized(未经授权的)copyingofcomputerprogramsbyAmericanbusinessesalonedeprivedsoftwarepublishersof$1.6billion
______(我刚回到家)thanitbegantopourwithrain.
随机试题
AbiographyBfictionCmagazinesDnewspapersEnon-fictionFphotocopiersGreferencebooks
某年轻患者,因左上智齿颊侧错位,需局麻下拔除为避免在麻醉过程中出现血肿,其防治原则中不包括以下哪项
20世纪20年代初,在印度发现的狼孩,在被人发现时,7~8岁,已没有语言能力,不能独立行走,尽管专家提供了丰富的生活条件和学习条件,但直至6年后才开始行走(这与训练动物的时间不相上下),到17岁死去之前,仅学会几十个单词,整体发育相当于2岁儿童水平。通过此
判断恶性胸腔积液的最重要根据是
格林一巴利综合征不常有的表现为
我国现行规范中,可以测定沥青15℃的密度,然后换算成25℃的相对密度。()
PMC模式下,按照工作范围不同,项目管理承包商的风险不同,下列关于项目管理承包商的风险的说法正确的是()。
在行业发展的四阶段模型中,对银行来说,比较理想的阶段是()。
B公司年初投资资本5200万元,预计今后三年可取得息前税后营业利润400万元,最近三年每年发生净投资为200万元,加权资本成本为6%,若从预计第四年开始可以进入稳定期,经济利润每年以1%的速度递增,则企业价值为多少?
有专家认为,全球经济正缓慢复苏。其主要证据是:美国的经济表现超出预期,在就业和住房方面都有不错的表现;欧洲央行启动了融资运作计划,用比较低的利率贷款,为更多的企业以及中小企业进行融资;全球整个大宗商品市场树立了足够的信心。因此,这都是非常好的迹象。如果以下
最新回复
(
0
)