首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
admin
2013-08-22
36
问题
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B, C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
If one party makes a strong plausible opening in the right way, that opening can often
选项
A、cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
B、lead to an adversarial event.
C、sabotage the whole negotiation process.
D、cause the other party to lose confidence.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Jj7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisViaAmor?
Whatkindofbusinessdoesthewomanworkat?
Yourcompanyhasfoundthatineffectivetimemanagementisoneofthemajorproblemareasthrough-outtheworkforce.Youhaveb
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Canyougiveanexampleofhowyouworkedeffectivelywithpeopletoaccomplishanimportantresult?
Askingquestions征询
Makingoffers提出报价
Makingpoliterequests客气要求
Passengerwithtwobagsshouldreporttothecounter
A.GreenwoodPublishingGroupTheGreenwoodPublishingGroupisoneoftheworld’sleadingpublishersofreferencetitles,acade
随机试题
简述出入境检验、检疫的报检范围。
A.化寒B.化热C.伤阳D.瘙痒痰饮、瘀血停滞体内日久,其病理演变可出现
开放性气胸治疗的原则包括()
有关双代号网络图绘制、参数计算以及计划调整工作说法正确的是( )。
供铁路、公路、渠道、管线横跨江河、沟谷及交通路线,有一定承载力的架空工程称为桥梁。下列关于桥桥梁的说法错误的是()。
期货公司风险监管指标优于预警标准并连续保持3个月的,风险预警期结束。()
根据《中国金融期货交易所股指期权仿真交易业务规则》,对于虚值期权、平值期权以及实值额小于或者等于交易所规定行权手续费的实值期权买方提出的行权申请,交易所不予行权。()
某法学院学生在学习法律行为分类的过程中,整理的笔记内容如下:①债务的免除、委托代理的撤销、无权代理的追认,为单方法律行为;②赠与为无偿法律行为;③融资租赁合同、委托合同以及建设工程合同为要式法律行为;④借款合同是主合同,担保合同是从合同。根据民事法律制度规
Whilestillinitsearlystages,welfarereformhasalreadybeenjudgedagreatsuccessinmanystates—atleastingettingpeopl
Publicspeakingfillsmostpeoplewithdread.Humiliationisthebiggestfearsself-exposureandfailingtoappealtothe【B1】___
最新回复
(
0
)