首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
admin
2013-08-22
32
问题
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B, C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
If one party makes a strong plausible opening in the right way, that opening can often
选项
A、cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
B、lead to an adversarial event.
C、sabotage the whole negotiation process.
D、cause the other party to lose confidence.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Jj7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisViaAmor?
TaskSheet:A:Advertising:howtowriteajobadvertisementB:StaffManagement:howtosetupaneffectiverewardingsyste
Askingquestions询问
Makingsuggestionsandrecommendations提出建议和劝告
ManagementSkills:theimportanceofeffectivedecision-makingprocedureswithinacompany
Question询问
Makingtravelarrangements旅行安排
Evaluatingadvantagesanddisadvantages权衡利弊
DoyouthinkthattheInternetisaneffectivechannelformarketingacompany’sproducts?
StrategicPlanning:thefactorsinvolvedinmanagingchangeeffectivelywithinanorganization
随机试题
关于建筑市场诚信行为的公布时限的说法,正确的是()。
根据发行人的不同,债券可以分为()。
中国公民王某就职于国内A上市公司,2010年收入情况如下:(1)1月1日起将其位于市区的一套公寓住房按市价出租,每月收取租金3800元。1月因卫生间漏水发生修缮费用1200元,已取得合法有效的支出凭证。(2)在国内另一家公司担任独立董事,3月取得该公川
人性的特征包括()。
目前,我国由于升大学竞争和就业竞争的现实性矛盾,学校教育陷入应试教育的模式中,而这种竞争也影响到学前教育阶段,如社会上风行的“零岁方案”“神童方案”。一些家长和幼教机构难以摆脱这种短视的教育做法,表现为重知识灌输轻能力培养、重智力培养轻人格因素培养等错误倾
作为治安管理处罚依据的法律、法规或者规章是应当公布的。
现代边缘派诗歌代表作《奇怪的接近》中写道:“咖啡的颜色接近于黑啤,黑啤的颜色接近于咖啡……我必须要放弃其中之一。我留下了黑啤,尽管它似乎不如咖啡高贵……”如果我们把诗歌中的语句看做表达了一种判断形式的话,以下选项中判断形式与之不同的是:
WhatdoRussia’sBelgorodprovinceandsomeschoolsinFloridaandConnecticuthaveincommon?Theyareunlikelyrecruitstothe
"It’slikebeingbittentodeathbyducks."That’showonemotherdescribedherconstantsquabbleswithhereleven-year-olddaug
A.claimB.advancedC.challengeD.butE.constantlyF.declareG.pilesupH.limitedI.significanceJ.hesitatedK.andL.
最新回复
(
0
)