首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In order to understand what a myth really is, must we choose between platitude and sophism? Some claim that human societies mere
In order to understand what a myth really is, must we choose between platitude and sophism? Some claim that human societies mere
admin
2013-03-27
67
问题
In order to understand what a myth really is, must we choose between platitude and sophism? Some claim that human societies merely express, through their mythology, fundamental feelings common to the whole of mankind, such as love, hate, or revenge or that they try to provide some kind of explanations for phenomena which they cannot otherwise understand—astronomical, meteorological, and the like. But why should these societies do it in such elaborate and devious ways, when all of them are also acquainted with empirical explanations? On the other hand, psychoanalysts and many anthropologists have shifted the problems away from the natural or cosmological toward the sociological and psychological fields. But then the interpretation becomes too easy: if a given mythology confers prominence on a certain figure, let us say an evil grandmother, it will be claimed that in such a society grandmothers are actually evil and that mythology reflects the social structure and the social relations; but should the actual data be conflicting, it would be as readily claimed that the purpose of mythology is to provide an outlet for repressed feelings. Whatever the situation, a clever dialectic will always find a way to pretend that a meaning has been found.
Mythology confronts the student with a situation which at first sight appears contradictory. On the one hand, it would seem that in the course of a myth anything is likely to happen. There is no logic, no continuity. Any characteristic can be attributed to any subject; every conceivable relation can be found. With myth, everything becomes possible. But on the other hand, this apparent arbitrariness is belied by the astounding similarity between myths collected in widely different regions. Therefore the problem: if the content of a myth is contingent, how are we going to explain the fact that myths throughout the world are so similar?
It is precisely this awareness of a basic antinomy pertaining to the nature of myth that may lead us toward its solution. For the contradiction which we face is very similar to that which in earlier times brought considerable worry to the first philosophers concerned with linguistic problems; linguistics could only begin to evolve as a science after this contradiction had been overcome. Ancient philosophers reasoned about language the way we do about mythology. On the one hand, they did notice that in a given language certain sequences of sounds were associated with definite meanings, and they earnestly aimed at discovering a reason for the linkage between those sounds and that meaning. Their attempt, however, was thwarted from the very beginning by the fact that the same sounds were equallypresent in other languages although the meaning they conveyed was entirely different. The contradiction was surmounted only by the discovery that it is the combination of sounds, not the sounds themselves, which provides the significant data.
To invite the mythologist to compare his precarious situation with that of the linguist in the pre-scientific stage is not enough. As a matter of fact we may thus be led only from one difficulty to another. There is a very good reason why myth cannot simply be treated as language if its specific problems are to be solved; myth is language; to be known, myth has to be told; it is a part of human speech. In order to preserve its specificity we must be able to show that it is both the same things as language. And also something different from it. Here, too, the past experience of linguists may help us. For language itself can be analyzed into things which are at the same time similar and yet different. This is precisely what is expressed in Saussure’s distinction between langue and parole, one being the structural side of language, the other the statistical aspect of it, langue belonging to a reversible time, parole being nonreversible. If those two levels already exist in language, then a third one can conceivably be isolated
What, according to the author, may myths help us to explain?
选项
A、Natural phenomena for which no empirical explanation has been found.
B、Sociological relations in a particular society.
C、Individual inarticulate emotional drives.
D、Socio-cultural patterns of a universal nature.
答案
D
解析
细节题。从第四段可知,神话是一门语言,但是与语言也有区别,又根据第一段,人们可借助神话解释某些特定的现象,还有社会学领域和心理学领域的问题,神话反映了社会结构和社会关系,所以神话有助于解释整个大自然的社会和文化的模式,D项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JxmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
21.Everytimeyoutrytoansweraquestionthataskswhy,youengageintheprocessofcausalanalysis--youattempttodetermine
HistorianstendtotellthesamejokewhentheyaredescribinghistoryeducationinAmerica.It’stheone【71】theteacherstandi
Wecannotbe______thechoicesthatourchildrenaregoingtomake,eventhoughwehavecontributedtothosechoices.
Thestudyofsocialscienceismorethanthestudyoftheindividualsocialsciences.Althoughitistruethattobeagoodsoci
OnApril20,2000,inAccra,Ghana,theleadersofsixWestAfricancountriesdeclaredtheirintentiontoproceedtomonetaryun
Asthepaceoflifecontinuestoincrease,wearefastlosingtheartofrelaxation.Onceyouareinthehabitofrushingthroug
Asthepaceoflifecontinuestoincrease,wearefastlosingtheartofrelaxation.Onceyouareinthehabitofrushingthroug
Somecustomstravelwell.Often,however,behaviorthatisconsideredtheepitomeof______athomeisperceivedasimpossibily
71.Asaromanticteenager,IbelievedthatmyfuturelifeasascientistwouldbejustifiedifIcoulddiscoverasinglenewfac
Economicshaslongbeenknownasthedismalscience.ButisanyeconomistsodrearyastocriticizeChristmas?Atfirstglance,
随机试题
在植物体内大多数生物碱存在形式是
患者,男,因腰疾,服用舒筋丸,服后出现头痛、头晕,烦躁不安,面部肌肉紧张,吞咽困难,进而伸肌和屈肌同时出现极度收缩,发生典型的士的宁惊厥、痉挛。诊断为服用含马钱子的舒筋丸中毒。服用含马钱子组分的药物的中毒原因有()
已满14周岁不满16周岁的人实施下列哪些行为应当承担刑事责任?()
记账凭证账务处理程序的特点是直接根据每张记账凭证逐笔登记总分类账。()
病例:患者,男,50岁,腰麻下疝修补术,术后头痛,一般镇痛药无效,应用安钠咖后仍无效。应如何给药?()
我国学校德育的主要内容是政治教育、思想教育、道德教育和()。
扑克牌游戏,小明背对小亮,让小亮按下列四个步骤操作:第一步。分发左中右三堆牌,每堆牌不少于两张,且各堆牌的张数相同;第二步,从左边一堆拿出两张,放入中间一堆;第三步,从右边一堆拿出一张,放入中间一堆;第四步,左边一堆
A.ShewassoproudofmeB.I’msuremymomdidn’tlikeitC.WhenIplayedonthestageD.Mycoachdrilledthewordintoour
我国上古神话中没有西方意义上的创始神话。()
Mostparent,Isuppose,havehadtheexperienceofreadingabedtimestorytotheir【C1】______andtheymusthave【C2】______howdif
最新回复
(
0
)