首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-01-24
19
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight.
About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income— about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding healthcare sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
According to the author, the real significance of health proposals is_____.
选项
A、to solve health problems
B、to show that health care is cheap
C、to provide insurance to the uninsured
D、to treat health care in a realistic way
答案
D
解析
作者在第一段结尾说,健康提议的真正意义在于别处,并不是给未投保的人提供保险(B)。在最后一段,作者指出,应对卫生体制有一个现实的认识(D)。故D为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KMaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、chaosintheregionB、strongerradicalIslamicextremistsC、Iran’sgainingnewrecruitsD、Iran’spursuingnuclearweaponsopen
Loveisthemostwonderfulthingintheworld.Peoplealwayshopetoowntheperfectlove.Herecomesthequestion:Doyoubelie
Theterm"formallearning"isusedinthispapertorefertoalllearningwhichtakesplaceintheclassroom,withoutregardto
A、developingandutilizingnewsourcesofenergy.B、reducingtaxesontheworkingpeopleoftheUS.C、encouragingtodesignand
A、FormerPresidentofRussiaYeltsindiedofaheartattackat76.B、BillClintonandhiswifeareexpectedtoattendonbehalf
NewDealwastheprogramofsocialandeconomicreformsintroducedbyPresident______.
YouaregoingtograduatefromUniversity,andduringtheresttimeyouaremoreconcernedwithyouroccupation.What’syourpla
Madrid—ItwasnomistakethatuniversitycampusesproliferatedduringSpain’sdecade-long,construction-ledboomyears.Educatio
房地产业作为国民经济的基础产业和主导产业,其发展历程不是一帆风顺的。我国在20世纪50年代中期到20世纪80年代初,房地产市场是不存在的。在这期间土地资源和房屋资源的配置不通过市场,而直接由政府的计划指令配置,公开的房地产市场基本被取消。因此,从20世纪8
美国华裔子女几乎都走过这样一段路。上初中高中时,特别反感父母给予的中国教育,彼此瞧不起具有中国背景的同代人。这段时间,华裔父母最紧张、最迷失,纷纷检讨自我教育的失败。然而,到了大学,事情却发生变化。做得越过分的孩子,越与有华裔背景的同学交往,不是因为他们与
随机试题
A.去枕平卧位B.平卧位C.平卧中凹位D.半卧位E.高斜坡卧位硬膜外麻醉术后应采取
神经根型颈椎病病人可能出现()。
下列()因素不会导致行业中现有企业之间竞争的加剧。
小辉学习成绩一般,音乐节奏感很强,这说明他的智商高。()
我国财政支农的比重一直偏低,进入20世纪90年代以来呈下降趋势.1991─1997年分别为10.3%、10.0%、9.5%、9.2%、8.4%、8.8%、8.3%。农业财政支出占国家财政总支出的比例,仅为农业在国民生产总值中的比例的至,这一定程度地削弱了农
美国扁桃仁于20世纪70年代出口到我国,当时被误译成“美国大杏仁”。这种误译导致大多数消费者根本不知道扁桃仁、杏仁是两种完全不同的产品。对此,尽管我国林果专家一再努力澄清,但学界的声音很难传达到相关企业和普通大众中。因此,必须制定林果的统一行业标准,这样才
Completethenotesbelow.ChooseNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSfromthepassageforeachanswer.Writeyouranswersinboxes7-9ony
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsI.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeople【T1】______【T1】______—waite
Astheoldsayinggoes,youarewhatyoueat.Thefoodsyoueatobviouslyaffectyourbody’sperformance.Theymayalsoinfluenc
Scientistssaytheyhave【B1】______evidencethatjoggingisgoodforpeople.ThislatestEuropeanresearch【B2】______headline-maki
最新回复
(
0
)