首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
admin
2011-03-14
17
问题
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymakers improve on the market outcome? There are no simple answers to these questions.
One source of inefficiency is the markup (涨价) of price over marginal cost. Because of the markup, some consumers who value the good at more than the marginal cost of production (but less than the price) will be deterred (被阻止) from buying it. Thus, a monopolistically competitive market has the normal deadweight loss of monopoly .pricing.
Although tins outcome is clearly undesirable compared to the first-best outcome of price equal to marginal cost, there is no easy way for policymakers to-fix the problem. To enforce marginal-cost pricing, policymakers would need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products. Because such products are so common in the economy, the administrative burden of such regulation would be overwhelming. Moreover, the regulating monopolistic competitors would entail all the problems of regulating natural monopolies. In particular, because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits already, requiring them to lower their prices to equal marginal cost would cause them to make losses. To keep these firms in business, the government would need to help them cover these losses. Rather than raising taxes to pay for these subsidies, policymakers may decide it is better to live with tile inefficiency of monopolistic pricing
Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the "ideal" one. That is, there may be too much or too little entry. One way to think about this problem is in terms of the externalities associated with entry. Whenever a new firm considers entering the market with a new product, it considers only the profit it would make. Yet its entry would also have two external effects: a) The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, there is a positive externality associated with entry b) The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, there is a negative externality associated with entry. Thus in a monopolistically competitive market, there are both positive and negative externalities associated with the entry of new firms. Depending on which externality is larger, a monopolistically competitive market could have either too few or too many products. Both of these externalities are closely related to the conditions for monopolistic competition. The former arises because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms. The latter arises because firms post a price above marginal cost and, therefore, are always eager to sell additional units. Conversely, because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods and charge a price equal to marginal cost, neither of these externalities exists under perfect competition.
In the end, we can conclude only that monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. That is, the invisible hand does not ensure that total surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition. Yet because the inefficiencies are subtle, hard to measure, and hard to fix, there is no easy way for public policy to improve the market outcome.
Why would policymakers need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products?
选项
A、Because such products are so common in the economy.
B、Because there is no easy way for policymakers to fix the problem.
C、Because they want to enforce marginal-cost pricing,
D、Because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits.
答案
C
解析
文中的不定式短语To enforce marginal-cost pricing就是表示目的的状语短语。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KSsa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
假设有两个寡头垄断厂商的行为遵循古诺模型,它们的成本函数分别为:这两个厂商生产一同质产品,其市场需求函数为:Q=4000+10p。根据古诺模型,试求:(1)厂商1和厂商2的反应函数;(2)均衡价格和厂商1与厂商2的均衡产量;(3)厂商
寡头垄断厂商的产品是()。
已知某垄断厂商的成本函数为TC=Q2+100,产品的需求函数为P=90-Q。(1)计算利润极大时的产量、利润和价格;(2)假设政府限定国内最高售价P=50,国内市场是否会出现超额需求引起的短缺?
你认为下面四个寡头垄断行业。哪一个最符合古诺模型?()。
寡头垄断和垄断的主要相同之处是()
Voiceswere______astheargumentbetweenthetwomotoristsbecamemorebad-tempered.
Oilisanimportant______materialwhichcanbeprocessedintomanydifferentproducts,includingplastics.
Alife-stylethatapparentlyexistsinallsocietiesismarriage--asociallysanctionedunionbetweenawomanandamanwithexp
Itremainstobeseenwhetherthereservesofrawmaterialsintheyear2000willbesufficienttosupplyaworldeconomywhich
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
随机试题
患者,男,35岁,昏迷5天。需鼻饲饮食以维持其营养需要。插管至15—20cm时,应注意
一般认为用于确诊实验的分析方法希望有
术前病人可采取的心理准备不包括
患者,男性,55岁。肾盂肾炎4年,今因腰痛、低热就诊。其中与发病密切相关的护理资料是
北京甲食品公司准备在中秋节前再生产月饼一批,因原料缺乏,便于2004年8月3日(信件载明日期)向山东乙农副产品公司以挂号信的形式发出订货要约一份,要求订购枣泥、豆沙和果脯各1000斤,要约中列明了质量要求和可接受的价格范围等条件,并表明承诺期为10日。乙公
甲公司(卖方)与乙公司于2007年10月签订了两份同一种农产品的国际贸易合同,约定交货期分别为2008年1月底和3月中旬,采用付款交单方式。甲公司依约将第一份合同项下的货物发运后,乙公司以资金周转困难为由,要求变更付款方式为货到后30天付款。甲公司无奈同意
关于布雷顿森林体系运行特征的说法,错误的是()。
据《唐会要》记载,唐中宗景龙元年(707年)规定:“两京市诸行,自有正铺者,不得于铺前更造偏铺,各听用(停止使用)寻常一样偏厢。诸行以滥物交易者,没官。”这反映出当时()
【材料】2011年11月25日,中国政法大学宪政研究所发布《2011年国家公务员招考中的就业歧视状况调查报告》,报告称2011年中央国家机关公务员招考所涉及的9762个岗位中,由于存在制度性的健康歧视和年龄歧视的规定,两种类型的就业歧视比例均为100%;
Youaregoingtoreadalistofheadingsandatextaboutmarket.Choosethemostsuitableheading.A.MarketDataB.MarketPr
最新回复
(
0
)