首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Another common type of reasoning is the search for causes and results. We want to know whether cigarettes really do cause lung c
Another common type of reasoning is the search for causes and results. We want to know whether cigarettes really do cause lung c
admin
2010-06-01
56
问题
Another common type of reasoning is the search for causes and results. We want to know whether cigarettes really do cause lung cancer, what causes malnutrition (营养不良), the decay of cities, or the decay of teeth. We are equally interested in effects: what is the effect of sulphur (硫)or lead in the atmosphere, of oil spills, and raw sewage in rivers and the sea, of staying up late on the night before an examination.
Causal reasoning may go from cause to effect or from effect to cause. Either way, we reason from what we know to what we want to find out. Sometimes we reason from an effect to a cause and then on to another effect. Thus, if we reason that because the lights have gone out, the refrigerator won’t work, we first relate the effect (light out) to the cause (power off) and then relate that cause to another effect (refrigerator not working). This kind of reasoning is called, for short, effect to effect. It is quite common to reason through an extensive chain of causal relations. When the lights go out, we might reason in the following causal chain: lights out--power off--refrigerator not working -- temperature will rise -- milk will sour. In the other words, we diagnose a succession of effects from the power failure, each becoming the cause of the next.
Causes are classified as necessary, sufficient, or contributory. A necessary cause is one which must be present for the effect to occur as combustion (燃烧) is necessary to drive a gasoline engine. A sufficient cause is one which can produce an effect unaided, though there may be more than one sufficient cause: a dead battery is enough to keep a ear from starting, but faulty spark plugs or an empty gas tank will have the same effect. A contributory cause is one which helps to produce an effect but can’t do so by itself, as running through a red light may help cause an accident, though other factors -- pedestrians or other cars in the intersection -- must also be present.
In establishing or denying a causal relation, it is usually necessary to show the process by which the supposed cause produces the effect. Such an explanation is called a causal process.
What the author discussed in the previous section is most probably about _____.
选项
A、classification of reasoning
B、some special types of reasoning
C、relationships between causes and results
D、some other common types of reasoning
答案
D
解析
推理题。文章第一段第一句中的another提供了答题的线索。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KZV7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhenwethinkofcreativepeoplethenamesthatprobablycometomindarethoseofmensuchasLeonardodaVinci,AlbertEinstei
"Humansshouldnottotrytoavoidstressanymorethantheywouldshunfood,loveorexercise",saidDr.HansSelye,thefirst
Theopportunitycostsofchoosingajobareespeciallyimportanttocollegestudents.Thereisakindoftriangularrelationship
Theopportunitycostsofchoosingajobareespeciallyimportanttocollegestudents.Thereisakindoftriangularrelationship
Interestinpursuinginternationalcareershassoaredinrecentyears,enhancedbychronic(长久的)personnelshortagesthatareca
Itishardtotrackthebluewhale,theocean’slargestcreaturewhichhasalmostbeenkilledoffbycommercialwhalingandisn
Theterm"essay"maybelooselyusedintheclassroomtomeananypieceofprosewritinglongerthanoneortwoparagraphs.Howe
A、Tomakethewomanangry.B、Topleasetheman’smother.C、Davidistheman’sgoodfriend.D、Davidisgoodatcarryingonconver
FrogWhenwasthelasttimeyousawafrog?Chancesare,ifyouliveinacity,youhavenotseenoneforsometime.Evenin
随机试题
WHO推荐使用的口服补液盐的氯化钾的浓度为
消费指标包括()。Ⅰ.金融机构存款总额Ⅱ.外商投资总额Ⅲ.城乡居民储蓄存款余额Ⅳ.社会消费品零售总额
当外界气温高于机体皮肤温度时,机体散热的方式是
婚姻家庭信托产品包括多种样式,下列选项中不属于家庭信托产品的种类的是()。
下列不属于持有至到期投资的有()。
下列属于证券公司操纵市场行为的是()。
在活跃市场中没有报价、公允价值不能可靠计量的权益工具投资,也有可能指定为以公允价值计量且其变动计入当期损益的金融资产。()
8,49,216,625,(),729。
To:DebbieHuFrom:LeeHaoJieSubject:HandheldScannersDebbie,IreceivedtheparcelfromScanTechnologyin1piece.Thesc
A、Threecrewmemberswereinvolvedintheincident.B、Noneofthehijackerscarriedanydeadlyweapons.C、Noneofthepassengers
最新回复
(
0
)