首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
One-click Content, No Guarantees Wikipedia is the first major reference work with a democratic premise. Its signature streng
One-click Content, No Guarantees Wikipedia is the first major reference work with a democratic premise. Its signature streng
admin
2013-03-21
45
问题
One-click Content, No Guarantees
Wikipedia is the first major reference work with a democratic premise. Its signature strength, however, is also its vulnerability, because user-generated articles are often (1)______or irrelevant. Who are the gatekeepers? How do they go about their business? Can we trust online encyclopedias? These are the questions I’m going to explore in today’s mini-lecture.
There are about 800 (2)______contributors, or Wikipedians, as they like to call themselves, who oversee this online encyclopedia. They have volunteered to maintain the site and help (3)______its accuracy.
Wikipedians claim the (4)______is actually carefully executed and multilayered. If there’s outright vandalism, an online team of hundreds of volunteers will take care of it. This is the first line of defense. In many cases, however, the decision to keep or cut is not as straightforward because a lot of stuff is (5)______. For example, when Florida author and programmer Rogers Cadenhead wrote an entry about himself, Wikipedians had to decide whether he was notable enough to warrant his own entry. When there is a (6)______, each Wikipedian speaks his or her piece, and then all administrators familiar with the issue are polled for a consensus, and changes are made accordingly.
Wikipedia administrators need not have scholarly credentials— the only requirements for the positions are keen research skills, (7)______, and lots of spare time. As a result, many publishers and academics have criticized the Wikipedia because they think leaving it open for anyone to contribute means that its content and accuracy will tend toward the mediocre.
Still, many users and contributors agree that the system works well, if not perfectly, in practice. In a head-to-head comparison of Wikipedia and Britannica in the journal Nature last year, only (8)______was shown.
What users should do is check their online finds against other (9)______and be aware of Wikipedia’s unique strengths and weaknesses. Wikipedia is a (10)______work in progress.
One-Click Content, No Guarantees
Should you trust the world’s first user-generated encyclopedia?
If you logged on to Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia last January to do research on current members of the U.S. Congress, you may have been surprised to find that the official entry for a Representative noted that he smelled of "cow dung".
Within hours, Wikipedia administrators had intercepted the renegade edits—but not before the incident provoked a nationwide media furor, spurring questions about the encyclopedia’s credibility. As the first-ever major reference work with a democratic premise—that anyone can contribute an article or edit an entry—Wikipedia has generated shared scholarly efforts to rival those of any literary or philosophical movement in history. Its signature strength, however, is also its greatest vulnerability. User-generated articles are often inaccurate or irrelevant, and vandals like the political jokesters are a constant threat. As a result, the role of the encyclopedia’s gatekeepers assumes added importance. Who are they, and how do they go about the business of deciding which new content will pass through their crucible? Can we trust online encyclopedias? These are the questions I’m going to explore in today’s mini-lecture.
Founded in 2001 by Jimmy Donal Wales, a former Chicago options trader, Wikipedia has morphed into a cultural phenomenon on a par with Google. Internet users have contributed more than 3 million articles in 200 languages to the site, and every few seconds, a new article or edit is added to Wikipedia’s 180-gigabyte database. Overseeing the entire gargantuan knowledge machine are the Wikipedia elite:about 800 longtime contributors who have volunteered to maintain the site and help ensure its accuracy.
The influx of information is so great that it’s easy to characterize content-control efforts as potshots into a crowd, but Wikipedians—as regular contributors like to call themselves—claim the review process is actually carefully executed and multilayered. The first line of defense is the so-called recent changes patrol, an online SWAT team made up of hundreds of volunteers who comb new or recently modified content for errors. If there’s outright vandalism, the recent changes patrol will avert the situation fairly quickly.
In many cases, however, the decision to keep or cut is not as straightforward.A lot of stuff is borderline. A question often asked is:"Is it verifiable? Is it important enough to go into the encyclopedia?" Disputes among administrators—senior Wikipedians who have the power to block or roll back edits on an entry, or even to delete an entry outright—about the validity or relevance of a fact or article can lead to pages—long online debates. When Florida author and programmer Rogers Cadenhead wrote an entry about himself, for instance, the question at issue was not whether Cadenhead was guilty of self-promotion, but whether he was notable enough to warrant his own entry. "Keep author of popular books," one Wikipedian weighed in. "Writing a book itself does not mean the person should be included," another administrator fired back. Someone looked up the books on Amazon, and Cadenhead’s sales rankings are 30 000 and 80 000. In the end, Cadenhead’s entry was kept—along with a note about the controversy.
The give-and-take review process is similar to a collegiate debate round. After each Wikipedian speaks his or her piece, all administrators familiar with the issue are polled for a consensus, and changes are made accordingly.
Unlike advisors at publications like the World Book Encyclopedia and the Encyclopedia Bri-tannica, Wikipedia administrators need not have scholarly credentials— the only requirements for the positions are keen research skills, a critical eye, and lots of spare time. The more users and gatekeepers who weigh in on an entry, the thinking goes, the more detailed and accurate it becomes, ideally producing a whole greater than the sum of its parts.
Many publishers and academics, however, have criticized the Wikipedia model on the grounds that it generates the informational equivalent of sludge. The lack of formal gatekeeping procedures, they say, ensures that the lowest common denominator will prevail—and since no experts or editors are hired to vet articles, no clear standards exist for accuracy or writing quality. Leaving Wikipedia open for anyone to contribute means that its content and accuracy will tend toward the mediocre.
Still, many users and contributors agree that the system works well, if not perfectly, in practice. And for those who assume that Wikipedia’s policies translate into general inaccuracy, in a head-to-head comparison of Wikipedia and Britannica in the journal Nature last year, Britannica had an average of three errors per published science article, while Wikipedia had four—a difference so slight it left the primacy of Britannica’s venerated review process in question.
That’s not to say Wikipedia users should ever feel so confident as to take the encyclopedia’s content on faith. Wales, the founder, advises readers to check their online finds against other sources and to be aware of Wikipedia’s unique strengths and weaknesses, especially when gathering information for research projects. Now let me end my lecture with Wales’ words: "No encyclopedia article is intended to be a primary source—it’s just an introductory summary, and people should approach it that way—Wikipedia’s timeliness is really impressive, and so is the sheer amount of brainpower we bring to bear on complicated questions. But because everything is so open and fluid, you have to be aware that anything on the site could be broken at any given moment. It’s a live work in progress."
选项
答案
borderline
解析
这里讨论的是第二种情况,即信息的价值不是一眼就能判断出的,而是边缘情况,此处的borderline和前文的not as straightforward同义。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LB4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AlanTuringandComputerscienceComputerplaysveryimportantroleintoday’sworld,whichistheresultofmanyresearchers
ClassificationsofCulturesAccordingtoEdwardHall,differentculturesresultindifferentideasabouttheworld.Hallis
Countlessmedicalstudieshaveconcludedthatplayingtoomanyvideogamescanbeharmfultoone’shealth.Now,however,itturn
TheatomofclothingshovedintheverybackofmybedroomclosetisoneIhaven’twornin15years,andprobablywon’teverwea
WhilethecitiesofChinahaveundergonemodernizationevidentintherisingtowersandbrightlightthathaveawakenedthesle
Thesupremelaw-makingauthorityinBritainis______.
"Whenpeoplesucceed,itisbecauseofhardwork.Luckhasnothingtodowithsuccess."Doyouagreeordisagreewiththequotat
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrueaboutthePrimeMinisterinBritain?
IwasborninFeb.12,1809,inHardinCounty,Kentucky.MyparentswerebothborninVirginia,ofundistinguishedfamilies--secon
乡下老家前面的空地,租给人家种桃花心木的树苗。树苗种下来后,植树人总是隔几天才来浇水。他来的天数并没有规则,有时三天,有时五天,有时十几天来一次。浇水的量也不一定,有时浇得多,有时浇得少。桃花心木有时就莫名地枯萎了,所以,他来的时候总会带几株树苗补种。
随机试题
根据我国《专利法》,申请专利的发明创造在申请日之前6个月内具有下列情况之一的不丧失新颖性,这些情况包括()
下列由慢性肾衰竭引起的肾性骨病中,最常见的是
以下颌支、下颌角为中心的肿胀、充血、压痛是何间隙感染的表现
男,25岁,突感上腹部剧痛。检查:血压130/80mmHg,脉搏110队/分,板样腹,肠鸣音消失。血红蛋白120g/L,血白细胞数8.0×109/L。首先应采取的检查是
1岁小儿结核菌素试验阳性,可以推测患儿()
利用燃烧或电能,把加热到熔化或接近熔化状态的金属微粒,喷附在金属制品表面上而形成保护层的一种方法称为()镀。
群体决策支持系统按照决策时间和群体成员地理上的邻近程度可分为决策室、局域决策网、电子会议、远程决策四种应用类型。下列有关四种应用类型特征的描述正确的有()。
政治社团,指的是在社会政治生活中,按照特定的利益集合在一起,有组织地参与、影响政府政策制定、变动和执行过程的社会团体。下列不属于政治社团的一项是()。
给定资料1.A市南部两个乡镇为招商引资,和一家畜牧企业签订了投资协议书,并和农民签订了上千亩的土地征用合同,用来创办生猪养殖基地及配套设施等。然而,2018年这家畜牧企业经营跟不上,无力支付土地租赁租金,表层土壤还遭到了破坏。村民张海村说,早知道
简述资本结构信号理论的主要内容。
最新回复
(
0
)