首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
92
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word those in Paragraph 3 refers to
选项
A、Carter and his party
B、grave robbers
C、ancient Egyptians
D、the contents of the tomb
答案
C
解析
本题属于指代题,考查考生认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系的能力。题目问:文章中的those指代的是什么?根据第3段,those后有一个who引导的定语从句“who sealed the tomb originally”,即“最早封墓的人”,来修饰限定those。而最早封墓的人应该是古代埃及人,因此选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethesentencesbelowwithNOMORETHANONEWORDfromthepassage.Writeyouranswersinboxes7-9onyouranswersheet.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,B,CorD.Writeyouranswersinboxes37-40onyouranswersheet.Whyweretheimperialrulerses
DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeinformationgiveninReadingPassage2?Inboxes17-23onyouranswersheet,writeTR
DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeinformationgiveninReadingPassage1?Inboxes11-13onyouranswersheet,writeTR
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions4-10)andthelistofpeoplebelow.Matcheachstatementwiththecorrectperson,A-F.
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.EngineeringforsustainabledevelopmentTheGreenhou
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?Itcanbeinferredfromparagraph3thatchipmunksdonotaidinthedispersalofoaktr
NarratorListentoapartofadiscussioninabiologyclass.Accordingtotheprofessor,whichisthemostfamouspollina
Whatistheconversationmainlyabout?Whycan’tthestudentstudyabroadinthefallsemester?
随机试题
再审民事判决书阐述理由必须有针对性,一方面要针对原判,一方面要针对()
嵌入性牙脱位多见于
下列各项,不属于子宫脱垂中医病名的是
关于计算工程量程序统筹图的说法,正确的是()。
后评价阶段对项目投入生产(运行)后各方面的影响进行的评价称为()。
刘瑞是一名高三的学生,他的父母都是机关干部,家庭生活条件优越。父母对他特别的宠爱,由于只有这么一个儿子,所以对他的期望也很高,这使刘瑞的心里压力非常大。高考时很想考好,却因为心理压力过大影响了正常的发挥,没有考入父母所期望的学校。非常失望的父母严厉指责了他
准备状态
近两三年,一幅中国山水画,在美国被新闻报纸炒得沸沸扬扬,引起社会广泛关注,这就是传为五代董源的《溪岸图》。《溪岸图》是一幅较早期的中国山水画应毫无疑问,而且它还是早期山水画中属保守的一派。其内容描写隐逸文人,充满着山居田园生活情趣。画中主人与妻子儿
试题要求如下:请编制程序,其功能是:从20个有符号字节数据中取出负数并计算其绝对值之和(字型),然后存放在指定的内存区中,多余的空间填0。例如:内存中有:80H,02H,00H,7CH,7BH,81H……结果为:80H
ItwillsaveyoumuchtimewhenyougothroughtheCustoms.
最新回复
(
0
)