首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
52
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word those in Paragraph 3 refers to
选项
A、Carter and his party
B、grave robbers
C、ancient Egyptians
D、the contents of the tomb
答案
C
解析
本题属于指代题,考查考生认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系的能力。题目问:文章中的those指代的是什么?根据第3段,those后有一个who引导的定语从句“who sealed the tomb originally”,即“最早封墓的人”,来修饰限定those。而最早封墓的人应该是古代埃及人,因此选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
ChooseTWOletters,A-F.Writethecorrectlettersinboxes25and26onyouranswersheet.WhichTWOofthefollowingstatement
Choosethecorrectletter,A,B,CorD.Writeyouranswersinboxes37-40onyouranswersheet.Whyweretheimperialrulerses
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14-26whicharebasedonReadingPassage2below.TheConquestofMalariainItal
WealthinAColdClimateLatitudeiscrucialtoanation’seconomicstrength.ADrWilliamMasterswasreadingabookaboutmosq
ClassifythefollowingcharacteristicsasrelatingtoASocialScienceBMedicalScienceCBothSocialScienceandMedicalScien
【1】Whatisthelostpropertynumbergiventotheman?
Whichmemberormembersofthespeaker’sfamilyhavehealthproblems?Whatdidthespeakerespeciallylikeabouttheholiday?
Theuniversityhasproduceda______toinformstudentsaboutthedifferentaccommodationoptionsavailable.SperrinHalls
Theprofessorsaysthatsuperhighways______.【27】
TheprofessoralreadyknowssomethingaboutClarefromher______.
随机试题
以下方法中,不是直接用于设备实体性贬值测算的方法是
直肠息肉的主要症状是
关于律师事务所,下列说法中正确的是哪一选项?()
在国际税法中,两个或两个以上的国家对同一笔所得在具有某种经济联系的不同纳税人手中各征一次税的现象称做什么?()
以下关于项目经济费用效益分析的说法中正确的是:
在建筑装饰饰面石材中,大理石的特性是( )。
募集机构应当妥善保存投资者适当性管理以及其他与私募基金募集业务相关的记录及其他相关资料,保存期限自基金清算终止之日起不得少于()年。
甲公司为上市公司,适用企业所得税税率为25%,所得税采用资产负债表债务法核算。甲公司2019年度实现利润总额8000万元,在申报2019年度企业所得税时涉及以下事项:(1)1月30日,甲公司购买一处公允价值为2400万元的新办公用房后即对外出租,款项已以
下列关于可转换公司债券的表述中,正确的有()。
我国公务员职位分为领导职务和非领导职务,领导职务的分类中不包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)