首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
48
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
The social reaction towards the immigration reform includes the following EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、right-wingers think it simply provides more chance for illegal immigrants
B、companies hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers
C、some people fear it will depress low-end wages
D、the majority of people think that the bill is a well-crafted compromise
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LoSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Formanypeople,mothsareswarming,dust-coloredpeststhateatourclothesanddisturbusflyingaroundlightsafterdark.
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Whatprinciplesgoverntheevolutionofaspecies?And
Thereissomethingintrinsicallyfascinatingabouttheideaofevolution.Whatprinciplesgoverntheevolutionofaspecies?And
Itwouldbewiseifyouhadnotbreathedasinglewordofthematter.
下面你将听到外商有关中国零售业发展情况的一段讲话。China’seconomy,oncereliantonstatespendinginheavyindustry,hasincreasinglylookedtothe
A、Theywerethroughwiththejobbefore6o’clock.B、Theywere3hourslate.C、Thecompletionofthejobtookmoretimethanthe
Eachsummer,nomatterhowpressingmyworkschedule,Itakeoffonedayexclusivelyformyson.Wecallitdad-sonday.Thisye
Acasualemployeeisonewhoisengagedandpaidbyagreementbetweentheemployerandtheemployee.There’sathree-hourminimu
悉尼(Sydney)是个非常现代化的城市,但也有许多历史名胜古迹。在市中心,你依然可以看到一些很久以前就建造在那里的老房子。
A、OnequarterofthewholeAmericanpopulation.B、ElevenpercentofthepresentAmericanpopulation.C、Around90,000.D、Some900
随机试题
马,白色,6岁。证见背腰拱起,腰脊僵硬,胯鞭腰拖,重则难起难卧。跛行随运动而减轻。该病可首选
某房地产开发公司以1200万元取得了1hm2综合用地50年的土地使用权。该地块地上容积率为6,建筑覆盖率为50%,可建一幢16层商住综合楼和一幢5层办公楼。商住综合楼第1~4层为建筑面积相同的商业用房,第5~16层为建筑面积相同的住宅。办公楼建筑面积500
既可用于排除地下水,又可排除地面水的排水设施是()。
关于可转换债券,下列说法正确的是()。
《劳动法》规定,用人单位在录用职工时,除国家规定的不适合妇女的工种或者岗位外,不得以()为由拒绝录用妇女或者提高对妇女的录用标准。
阅读下面材料,回答问题。与前一年相比,工业废水排放达标率增幅最大的年份是:
简述教育实验的基本类型。
中华人民共和国的国家机构实行——原则。
2019年5月11日,内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市青城公园内突发大火。经查,是有游人乱扔炯头引燃了地面上堆积的柳絮,从而引燃游船。同日,江苏省高邮市郭集镇某废品收购站因有人乱扔烟头引燃柳絮发生火灾。不少人认为,通过宣传、警示、罚款等手段约束乱扔烟头的人,才是治本
Whichofthefollowingisthemaintopicofthepassage?______.Accordingtothelastparagraph,whichofthefollowingwillb
最新回复
(
0
)