首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
32
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
The social reaction towards the immigration reform includes the following EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、right-wingers think it simply provides more chance for illegal immigrants
B、companies hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers
C、some people fear it will depress low-end wages
D、the majority of people think that the bill is a well-crafted compromise
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LoSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Opponentsofgeneticengineeringclaimthatscientistsaretamperingwithmattersthattheyknowlittleandessentiallycommitti
AdiscoveryinNewJerseyactuallycontributedtotheearlyeconomicdevelopmentoftheU.S.and,in1714aworkeruncoveredag
Thecompanysponsorsanessaycompetitionthatstudentssubmitpapers,apanelofhistorianswilljudgethemonthebasisofsty
Declininghouseprices,risingjoblayoffs,skyrocketingoilcostsandamajorcreditcrunchhavebroughtconsumerconfidenceto
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeavorissurelypubliclyfinancedscience.Morally,ta
People’snatural"flightorfight"responsewillbeautomatedwhen________withthephobiasource.
当前,亚欧两地区都处于蓬勃发展的阶段。亚洲是世界上最具经济活力的地区,资源丰富,市场广阔,区域合作方兴未艾。欧盟是世界上最大的发达经济体,资本充裕,科技先进,一体化程度高。两地区政治上共识很多,经济上优势互补,文化上各具特色,为开展更广泛和具有实质性的对话
Orangehasawavelengthlongerthanthatofgreen.
大多数人在考试中都很紧张。紧张会让他们在做题时没有平时效率高。结果,他们的分数会比自己预期的要低。关键词汇:anxious:焦虑;efficient:有效。这句话的首句听出anxious就基本没有问题,而首句听懂之后便能帮助理解后面两句话。
A、IamprettysurethatIwon’tbelate.B、Igiveyoumywordnottobelate.C、I’lltrymybest,sothere’snodoubtthatI’ll
随机试题
中国证监会并购重组委员会的主要职责有()。Ⅰ.审核财务顾问等专业机构为并购重组事项出具的有关材料及意见书Ⅱ.审核中国证监会有关职能部门出具的审核报告Ⅲ.依法审核上市并购重组申请是否符合相关条件Ⅳ.依法对并购重组事项提出审核意见
下列是期限错配出现的原因的是()。
2010年12月16日,甲公司与乙公司签订了一项租赁协议,将一栋经营管理用写字楼出租给乙公司,租赁期为3年,租赁期开始日为2011年1月1日,年租金为240万元,于每年年初收取。相关资料如下:(1)2010年12月31日,甲公司将该写字楼停止自用,
甲公司为一家制衣公司,2012年计划销售增长率为25%,该增长率超出公司正常的增长水平较多,为了预测融资需求,安排超常增长所需资金,财务经理请你协助安排有关的财务分析工作,该项分析需要依据管理用财务报表进行,相关资料如下:资料一:除银行借款外,其他资
《物业管理条例》规定一级物业管理企业中专业人员以及工程、管理、经济类等相关专业的专职管理和技术人员应该不少于()人,其中,中级以上职称的人员应该不少于()人。
女性导游人员如需单独进入异性旅游者房间,房门要()
设f(χ)在[0,1]上连续,在(0,1)内可导,且f(0)=0,f(1)=1,证明:对任意的a>0,b>0,存在ξ,η∈(0,1),使得=a+b.
WhatdoRussia’sBelgorodprovinceandsomeschoolsinFloridaandConnecticuthaveincommon?Theyareunlikelyrecruitstothe
What’sthegoodnewsfortheman?
A、 B、 C、 A
最新回复
(
0
)