2. 考研
  3. Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon, com received one for

Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon, com received one for

admin2021-01-06  24
问题     Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon, com received one for its "one-click" online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.
    Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said it would use a particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known, is "a very big deal," says Dennis D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of Law. It "has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents.
    Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face, because it was the Federal Circuit itself that introduced such patents with its 1998 decision in the so-called State Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging Internet companies trying to stake out exclusive rights to specific types of online transactions. Later, more established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch. In 2005 , IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents, despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some Wall Street investment firms armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.
    The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal Circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court’s judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should "reconsider" its State Street Bank ruling.
    The Federal Circuit’s action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example, the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for "inventions" that are obvious. The judges on the Federal Circuit are "reacting to the anti-patent trend at the Supreme Court," says Harold C. Wegner, a patent attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
选项 A、their limited value to businesses.
B、their connection with asset allocation.
C、the possible restriction on their granting.
D、the controversy over their authorization.
答案C
解析 本题是事实细节题。本题问“最近商业模式专利引起关注的原因”。定位点在原文第二段首句：Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents，即“现在本国的最高专利法院好像完全倾向于减少授予这种商业模式专利了”，就是说“可能对授予这种专利加以限制”。A项说“他们对商业的价值有限”属于原文没有提到的新信息；B项中的asset allocation只是说明这种专利时举出的具体例子中的内容，并不说明它们之间的联系是引发关注的原因；D项迷惑性最大，看似与第二段首句的后半个句子相似，但实际有巨大差别。原文说“这种专利在10年前被首次授予后就颇受争议”，说明受争议的是“这种专利”，而D项则说“对这种专利权的授予产生的争议”，偷换了原文概念。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MN1Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)