首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
admin
2019-09-23
80
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and ... find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals.
Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry — making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature —
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows — as if we needed reminding — that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
The last paragraph tells us that______.
选项
A、several factors cause human drug-resistant infections
B、people worry about the use of antibiotics in animals
C、human beings are liable to be attacked by bacteria
D、drug-resistant infections bring illnesses to humans
答案
A
解析
细节题。第5段第1句直接告诉大家“家畜抗生素的使用方式并不是人类耐药感染的唯一原因”,故选A。注意D容易误选,耐药感染会使人们在使用抗生素时无效,增加治愈疾病的难度,而不是直接让人生病。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MVMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Washington:TheBushadministrationhas【L1】______forthefirsttimethatitmaybewillingto【L2】______amultinationalforcein
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrueaccordingtowhatyouhaveheard?
Whenisanordinarytropicalstormcalledahurricane?
Earthquakesoftenhappennearvolcanoes,butthisisnotalwaystrue.Thecentersofsomeare【L1】______.Thebottomoftheseas
A、正确B、错误B因果关系的找寻和判断。根据原文ItallowedsettlersintheGreatLakesregiontosendtheircropseastwardtoNewYorkCityatthemou
Whichofthefollowingcanbestdescribeherpersonality?
A、Match-MakingintheUSB、SecretsofSuccessfulMarriagesC、FriendshipandMarriageD、WaystoAvoidHarminMarriageB主旨题。全文首先介
Coastalenvironmentalprotectionisan【C1】______partoftheTexasGeneralLandOfficemission.Theagency【C2】_______coastal
Theterm"leader"hasbeenusedalmosttothepointof【C1】______,nowbrandinganyonewho【C2】______inaleadershiprole.Butthe
Theterm"leader"hasbeenusedalmosttothepointof【C1】______,nowbrandinganyonewho【C2】______inaleadershiprole.Butthe
随机试题
引起慢性肾功能不全的最常见继发性肾脏病是
A.肠肝循环B.生物利用度C.生物半衰期D.表观分布容积E.单室模型药物在体内各组织器官中迅速分布并迅速达到动态分布平衡
()指由于利率的不确定,人们愿意持有现金寻找更好的获利机会。
某勘察设计院成立20多年来,创造了许多辉煌业绩。近几年来,市场竞争激烈,勘察设计院在管理和服务等方面出现了相对落后的情况,业绩逐年下降。2008年新上任的陆院长利用勘察设计院改制的机会,对勘察设计院进行了变革:首先,对组织结构进行了调整,将业务进行了重新组
案例:在“燃烧与灭火”这一节课的教学中,我结合生活中的燃烧现象,并出示了几张图片,开门见山地引入了课题,此时学生们也表现出了很强的求知欲望。接着我进行演示实验,想通过此实验让学生得出燃烧所需要的条件。而此时意想不到的事情发生了:实验时,铜片上的白磷剧烈地燃
樽海鞘是一种身体呈桶状、半透明,身长在1厘米到10厘米之间的一种海洋无脊椎生物。2014年1月21日,新西兰一名渔民在海里捕捞到一条几乎完全透明的海洋生物,像果冻一样柔软,与虾体型、大小类似。从以上的陈述中不能得出以下哪项结论?()
“五一六”通知
简述环境污染责任的构成要件和归责原则。
关系模式R(U,F),其中U={W,X,Y,Z),F={WX→Y,W→X,X→Z,Y→W}。关系模式R的候选键是(45),(46)是无损连接并保持函数依赖的分解。
下列叙述中,不属于设计准则的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)