首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
admin
2012-12-30
57
问题
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.
Ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s boss, demanding changes in Google Buzz, the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find "followers" for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.
Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply and limit the freedom of global Internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly, privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders, often thanks to companies like Google and Fa-cebook, which manage vast databases.
A recent scandal dubbed "Wi-Figate" exemplifies the problem. Google (accidentally, it insists) gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European regulators ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed.
Despite such differences within Europe, the gap is much greater between Europe and America, home to many of the world’s largest online social networks and search engines. European regulations are inspired by the conviction that data privacy is a fundamental human right and that individuals should be in control of how their data are used. America, on the other hand, takes a more relaxed view, allowing people to use consumer-protection laws to seek redress if they feel their privacy has been violated. Companies that handle users’ data are largely expected to police themselves.
Some experts say this dichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targets of European Union data watchdogs. Jules Polonetsky of the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, says that many American firms have yet to learn that showing up in Europe and extolling the virtues of self-regulation is likely to be as ineffective as rightwing politicians denouncing antidiscrimination laws back home.
Transatlantic friction between companies and regulators has grown as Europe’s data guardians have become more assertive. Francesca Bignami, a professor at George Washington University’s law school, says that the explosion of digital technologies has made it impossible for watchdogs to keep a close eye on every web company operating in their backyard. So instead they are relying more on scapegoating prominent wrongdoers in the hope that this will deter others.
But regulators such as Peter Schaar, who heads Germany’s federal data-protection agency, say the gulf is exaggerated. Some European countries, he points out, now have rules that make companies who suffer big losses of customer data to report these to the authorities. The inspiration for these measures comes from America.
Yet even Mr. Schaar admits that the Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic. He hints that Europe might adopt a more flexible regulatory stance if America were to create what amounts to an independent data-protection body along European lines. In Europe, where the flagship Data Protection Directive came into effect in 1995, before firms such as Google and Facebook were even founded, the European Commission is conducting a review of its privacy policies. In America, Congress has begun debating a new privacy bill and the Federal Trade Commission is considering an overhaul of its rules. David Vladeck.the head of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, has acknowledged that "existing privacy frameworks have limitations".
Even if America and Europe do narrow their differences, Internet firms will still have to grapple with other data watchdogs. In Asia, countries that belong to APEC are trying to develop a set of regional guidelines for privacy rules under an initiative known as the Data Privacy Pathfinder. Some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have longstanding privacy laws, but many emerging nations have yet to roll out fully fledged versions of their own. Mr. Polonetsky sees Asia as "a new privacy battleground", with America and Europe both keen to tempt countries towards their own regulatory model. Shoehorning such firms into antiquated privacy frameworks will not benefit either them or their users.
Mr. Schaar’s attitude towards watchdogs in America and Europe is
选项
A、biased.
B、objective.
C、ambivalent.
D、ambiguous.
答案
B
解析
态度题。由题干中的Mr.Schaar定位至第八段。首句指出“Yet even Mr.Schaar admits thatthe Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic.”。第二句随之做出解释:他暗示如果美国按照欧洲方式建立一个相当于数据保护的独立主体,欧洲可能会采取更灵活的监管立场。由此可以判断,虽然Mr.Schaar是德国监管机构人员,但对于欧美在监管上存在的分歧持有的态度还是比较客观的,故[B]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MVaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
______isoftendescribedas"fatherofmodemlinguistics".
Whoiscalled"fatherofEnglishandEuropeannovels"?
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
AlloftheGreatLakesaresharedbetweentheUnitedStatesandCanadaEXCEPT
Beguninthelate1960sbyPentagonweaponsresearchersasasystemforeasingcommunicationbetweencomputersindisparateelec
Beguninthelate1960sbyPentagonweaponsresearchersasasystemforeasingcommunicationbetweencomputersindisparateelec
SevenTypesofEvidenceItisimportanttolearntouseevidenceinargumentativewriting,becausewithoutevidence,youcan’t
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
Theinterviewismainlyadiscussionconcerning
随机试题
治疗氨基甲酸酯类农药中毒首选
下列关于氧化磷酸化偶联机理的化学渗透学说,哪一项是错误的
避雷针与易燃油贮罐呼吸阀和氢气、天然气等罐体呼吸阀之间的空中距离:避雷针与呼吸阀的水平距离不应小于();避雷针尖高出呼吸阀不应小于()?
某项目厂区占地面积为80000平方米,其中:建(构)筑物占地面积为23500平方米,道路和广场占地面积25000平方米,露天堆场占地面积3500平方米,绿化面积为3000平方米,管线及管廊占地面积为5000平方米。经计算,该项目的场地利用系数为(
地基验槽时,需在基底进行轻型动力触探的部位有()。[2011年真题]
从1,2,3,4,5中任取2个不同的数,事件A=“取到的2个数之和为偶数”,事件B=“取到的2个数均为偶数”,则P(B|A)=()
治安管理处罚的种类,可划分为()。
飞轮效应指的是为了使静止的飞轮转动起来,一开始你必须使很大的力气,一圈一圈反复地推,每转一圈都很费力,但是每一圈的努力都不会白费,飞轮会转动得越来越快,达到某一临界点后,飞轮的重力和冲力会成为推动力的一部分。这时,你无须再费更大的力气,飞轮依旧会快速转动,
有甲、乙、丙三个口袋,其中甲袋装有1个红球,2个白球,2个黑球;乙袋装有2个红球,1个白球,2个黑球;丙袋装有2个红球,3个白球.现任取一袋,从中任取2个球,用X表示取到的红球数,Y表示取到的白球数,Z表示取到的黑球数,试求:(Ⅰ)(X,Y)的
A、Twoandahalfhours.B、Fourhours.C、Threeandahalfhours.D、Threehours.DW:Wecantaketheexpresstrainandsavehalfa
最新回复
(
0
)