首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
31
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断,全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
1776
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,itisonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Atatimewheneveryone’smindistheexplosionsofthemoment,itmightseemobtuseofmetodiscussthefourteenthcentury.Bu
【61】ScientistsatJohnsHopkinshavediscovered"striking"differencesbetweenmenandwomeninapartofthebrainlinkedwith
Someyearsago,PioneerHi-bredInternational,whereIwasemployed,purchasedNorandCorporation.Pioneer’ssalesrepresenta
Whatisleanproduction?Perhapsthebestwaytodescribethisinnovativeproductionsystemistocontrastitwithcraftproduct
Manyayoungpersontellsmehewantstobeawriter.Ialwaysencouragesuchpeople,butIalsoexplainthatthere’sabigdiff
Sailorsandfishermeninparticular,havealwaysbeenextremelysuperstitious.Thisishardlysurprisingwhenoneconsidersthe
Thebigidentity-theftbustlastweekwasjustatasteofwhat’stocome.Here’showtoprotectyourgoodname.HERE’STHES
Whenwillshowersreachsouth-westEnglandandthesoutherncoastofWales?
随机试题
下列选项中,对现代学校教育制度改革的趋势表述不正确的一项是()
呼吸链中的递氢体不包括
A、五脏六腑病证B、表里经脉病证C、五脏病证D、六腑病证E、急性病证络穴主要治疗
A.静脉注射碳酸氢钠B.口服碳酸钙C.血液滤过治疗D.给予促红细胞生成素E.给予MTX慢性肾功能不全、高磷血症
关于工艺方案的评审,说法不正确的是()。
李女士通过跨境电商平台购买名牌香水1瓶(15毫升),电商平台对该香水海外代购报价300元,该价格是海外代购商品的关税完税价格(不含税零售价和运保费),假定进口高档化妆品的关税率30%,则电商平台应代收代缴李女士消费税()元。
以下资料,回答86-90题根据材料,下面的说法中正确的一项是:
“反对责任擅断和反对有害追溯”,体现的法律归责原则是()。
Nottoomanydecadesagoitseemed"obvious"bothtothegeneralpublicandtosociologiststhatmodernsocietyhaschangedpeop
Myhouseisfullofdustbecausetheoldhousejustopposite______(pull)down.
最新回复
(
0
)