首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2015-04-24
50
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does " the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless.
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism.
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry.
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity.
答案
A
解析
细节判断题。根据题干信息定位到原文第四段尾句。此句中的She指代Heidi Julavits,原句中的hostile,self-serving与选项A中的unfriendly,selfless对应。故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MgLO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thereisanewtypeofsmalladvertisementbecomingincreasinglycommoninnewspaperclassifiedcolumns.Itissometimesplaced
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,t
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,t
Researchiscommonlydividedinto"applied"and"pure".Thisclassificationisarbitraryandloose,butwhatisusuallymeantis
Researchiscommonlydividedinto"applied"and"pure".Thisclassificationisarbitraryandloose,butwhatisusuallymeantis
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
GeniusThegreatestresultsinlifeareattainedbysimplemeans,andtheexerciseofordinaryqualities.Thecommonlifeof
TheAmericaneconomy,whetheringovernmentorprivateindustry,hasfoundretirementaconvenientpracticeformanagingthelab
Theageatwhichyoungchildrenbegintomakemoraldiscriminationsaboutharmfulactionscommittedagainstthemselvesorothers
Peopleofallcountriesareexpectedto______theprinciplesoftheUnitedNationsanddefendthepeaceintheworld.
随机试题
核桃不能在春季发芽前嫁接,造成伤口感染的原因是()。
下列哪些病因的胸腔积液是渗出液?
下列哪项不是胎漏的常见证型:
反射声和直达声传至人耳的时间差大于多少毫秒(ms),人们就有可能听到回声(或者说声音听起来是断续的)?
下列选项不属于自动控制系统的组成部分的是()。
浆砌片石护墙用于路堑边坡的防护时,其基础埋置深度不应小于()m。
风险管理评级是对银行风险管理系统,即()的政策、程序、技术等的完整性、有效性进行评价并定级的过程。
国家建立中央银行,专门行使中央银行的职能,这种模式称为()制度。
质量改进旨在消除()问题。
Inthepast,degreeswereveryunusualinmyfamily.Irememberthedaymyunclegraduated.Wehadahugeparty,andformanyye
最新回复
(
0
)