首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2015-04-24
58
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does " the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless.
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism.
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry.
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity.
答案
A
解析
细节判断题。根据题干信息定位到原文第四段尾句。此句中的She指代Heidi Julavits,原句中的hostile,self-serving与选项A中的unfriendly,selfless对应。故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MgLO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thereisanewtypeofsmalladvertisementbecomingincreasinglycommoninnewspaperclassifiedcolumns.Itissometimesplaced
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,t
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,t
ThemilitaryaspectoftheUnitedStatesCivilWarhasalwaysattractedthemostattentionfromscholars.Theroarofgunfire,t
CalledbymanycriticsthegreatestachievementofEnglishlyricalpoetry,thiselegywaswrittenuponthedeathofafellowalu
CalledbymanycriticsthegreatestachievementofEnglishlyricalpoetry,thiselegywaswrittenuponthedeathofafellowalu
TheAmericaneconomy,whetheringovernmentorprivateindustry,hasfoundretirementaconvenientpracticeformanagingthelab
TheAmericaneconomy,whetheringovernmentorprivateindustry,hasfoundretirementaconvenientpracticeformanagingthelab
随机试题
如果孕妇在孕期暴露于某因素与婴儿畸形的相对危险度是5,意味着
一患者因颏部粉碎性骨折导致舌后坠,引起窒息。最合理的急救方法是
()迫使操纵者应用两只手来操纵控制器,它仅能对操作者提供保护。
某月30d,绞吸挖泥船完成工程量20万m3,该船时间利用率60%,已知该船排泥管径为0.6m,泥浆浓度10%。问题:试述绞吸挖泥船基本原理。
在境外旅游的过程中,全陪应与接待社导游人员密切合作,积极妥善处理各项问题和事故,维护游客的合法权益。()
请为幼儿园大班设计一份“保护环境”的教育主题活动。
将十六进制7E8F转换为十进制数是()。
2012年2月29日,国务院常务会议同意发布新修订的《环境空气质量标准》,新标准增加了细颗粒物(PM2.5)和臭氧(O3)8小时浓度限值监测指标。下列关于PM2.5的说法,错误的是()。
下列叙述中正确的是
计算机之所以能按人们的意图自动进行工作,最直接的原因是因为采用了()。
最新回复
(
0
)