首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
admin
2015-01-09
24
问题
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical hypothesis is that hypnosis may be the product of "vivid imagination", a now discredited charge stemming from the observation that many people who are hypnotizable can be led to experience compellingly realistic auditory and visual hallucinations. Nothing that an auditory hallucination and the act of imagining a sound are both self-generated and that,like real hearing,a hallucination is experienced as the product of an external source, Henry Szechtman used PET(positron emission tomography)to image the brain activity of hypnotized subjects invited to imagine a scenario and then experiencing a hallucination. By monitoring regional blood flow in areas activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged"as authentic and originating in the outside world.
Szechtman imaged the brain activity of eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to hallucinate under hypnosis. During the session,the subjects were under hypnosis and lay in the PET scanner with their brain activity being monitored under four conditions:at rest;while hearing an audiotape of a voice,while imagining hearing the voice again;and during the auditory hallucination they experienced after being informed that the tape was playing once more,although it was not. The tests suggested that a region of the brain called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the volunteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the stimulus. In contrast, that brain area remained dormant while the subjects were imagining that they heard the stimulus.
The second major objection raised by critics argues that hypnosis’ ability to blunt pain results from either simple relaxation or a placebo response. McGlashan established that while hypnosis was only as effective in reducing pain as a sugar pill for poorly hypnotizable people,highly hypnotizable subjects benefited three times more from hypnosis than from the placebo. In response to these successes,Rainville devised experiments to determine which brain structures are involved in pain relief during hypnosis,attempting to locate the brain structures associated with the suffering component of pain,as distinct from its sensory aspects. Using PET, he and other scientists found that hypnosis reduced the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex—an area known to be involved in pain—but did not affect the activity of the somatosensory cortex, where the sensations of pain are processed.
Despite the value of these findings,the mechanisms underlying hypnotic pain relief are still poorly understood. The model favored by most researchers is that the analgesic effect of hypnosis occurs in higher brain centers than those involved in registering the painful sensation, accounting for the fact that most autonomic responses that routinely accompany pain—such as increased heart rate—are relatively unaffected by hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.
The research described in the passage is primarily concerned with answering which of the following questions?
选项
A、What research guarantees the reality of the effects that hypnosis has on brain activity, and what is their causal mechanism?
B、How are experiments devoted to disproving the "vivid imagination"objection to hypnosis different from those devoted to disproving the"placebo effect"thesis?
C、How can researchers reproduce the useful effects of hypnosis in a medical setting?
D、What technical advances have permitted researchers to reject skeptical explanations of the phenomenon of hypnosis?
答案
C
解析
内容理解题。问的是文章主要回答了那些问题。根据原文,第二段讲了催眠对大脑活动作用;第三段讲了催眠止痛的大脑机制问题。所以正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MqQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Tourismdevelopsculture.Itbroadensthethinkingofthetravelerandleadstoculture【C1】______betweenthehostsandguestsfr
Onceuponatime,innovationatProcter&Gambleflowedoneway:fromtheUnitedStatesoutward.WhilethelargeCincinnati-base
Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationisaperiodofincre
Bothversionsofthemyth—theWestasaplaceofescapefromsocietyandtheWestasastageonwhichthemoralconflictsconfro
TheUnitedNationsPopulationFundhaspickedOctober31asthedaytheworldwillbehometo7billionpeople.Forbettera
Wehaveto______theroutineexpenditure,otherwiseitwillbeimpossibleforustoaffordacar.
Allthequestions______aroundwhatshehadbeendoingonthenightoftherobbery.
Wearemovingtowardsamore______andcooperativesociety,whichisgettingbetterandbetter.
She______muchmoreaccurateresponsesnow,hadshetakenmorepainsindevisingthequestions.
Agoodmodernnewspaperisanextraordinarypieceofreading.Itisremarkablefirstforwhatitcontains:therangeofnewsfro
随机试题
苏子降气汤的功用是
某企业有固定资产560万元,流动资产120万元,存货50万元,负债200万元,其中流动负债100万元,则其速动比率是()。
根据现行合同价款的调整要求,承包人采购材料和工程设备的,应在合同中约定主要材料或工程设备价格变化的范围和幅度,如没有约定,则单价变化超过()时,超过部分应做相应的调整。
某项技术为一项新产品设计及工艺技术,已使用3年,证明技术可靠,产品比同类产品性能优越。经了解,同类产品平均价格为150元/件,该产品价格为180元/件。目前该产品年销量为2万件。经分析,产品寿命还可以维持8年,但竞争者将会介入。由于该企业已较稳固地占领了市
阅读下面材料,回答问题。路灯下的守望没有晚风吹笛,没有月光煮酒,一盏盏灯火点亮孤独的城市。我匆匆吃过母亲中午走时预留的晚餐,躺坐沙发,开始用遥控器点播欢愉。荧屏里刀光剑影,红颜如玉,上演着绚烂的青春与江湖
其他存款性公司是指除中央银行以外的所有存款性公司。下列选项中,不属于其他存款性公司的是()
下列不属于夫妻共同财产的是:
近期,某公司推出了一款空调,其耗电量比市面上所有其他同类产品都要低。因此,该公司管理层认为,这款空调的销量将会超过市面上所有其他同类产品。以下哪项为真,最能质疑该公司管理层的判断?
求极限
The1982oilandGasActgivespowertopermitthedisposalofassetsheldbytheCorporation,and______theCorporation’sstat
最新回复
(
0
)